Go back
How come George Bush failed to catch Osama?

How come George Bush failed to catch Osama?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
Interesting, but unlikely. Most Americans would like to see his head on a plate.
The gov. is not "most Americans".

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
The gov. is not "most Americans".
I'd like to see his head on a plate, and with an apple sticking out his mouth.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by torch71
I'd like to see his head on a plate, and with an apple sticking out his mouth.
Yes, most Americans would like to see him fall, but the gov. is not... never
mind. I would like to see Bush simultaneously burn and sing. That would
bring me exquisite pleasure like you cannot believe.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SMSBear716
Why didn't Bill Clinton. We know he had multiple chances. Ask Maddy Albright. Or that idiot who was National Security advisor.. Sandy Berger or is that spelt Burgher? Will we are at it.. lets ask why he isn't in jail for stealing documents at the National Archives?
I think it's spelled Burglar. Sandy Burglar.

Vote Up
Vote Down

How come George Bush failed to catch Osama?

o Osama removed his explosive vest
o Bush had no spikes on shoes
o Osama used starting blocks
o When Saad Al-Fagih fired the starters pistol, Bush ducked
o Osama has longer legs
o Bush still suffers from smokers lung syndrone
o Osama takes illegal steroids

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by MacSwain
o Osama takes illegal steroids
It's a performance enhancing turban.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SMSBear716
My question still stands..... he had his chances when he was the TriPOTUS....:-)
He had 3 chances and each were cancelled at the last minue because of concerns of killing innocent people and the backlash that would have resulted.

Democrats don't want to kill 1 bad guy if it means killing 10 innocent people.

Republicans don't mind killing 10 innocent people if it means killing 1 bad guy

Vote Up
Vote Down
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Discuss.
He's a middle aged guy. How is he supposed to catch Bin Laden? I'm sure if he went over there someone would recognize him and alert Bin Laden. They haven't been able to catch half of the criminals in this country. If someone helps hide him or anyone else, they could easily do so and there's nothing that can be done about it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
He had 3 chances and each were cancelled at the last minue because of concerns of killing innocent people and the backlash that would have resulted.

Democrats don't want to kill 1 bad guy if it means killing 10 innocent people.

Republicans don't mind killing 10 innocent people if it means killing 1 bad guy
I'd kill the 10 innocents to get the bad guy ... since sometime in the future the plans/actions of the bad guy might kill thousands of innocents.....

Democrats would kill the bad guy, but first they'd have to have a 'focus group' , take serveral polls and hold their finger up to the wind.

By then the bad guy has disappeared

Vote Up
Vote Down

I bet if someone would accuse Bin Laden of causing Global Warming the Libs would find him in no time. That is of course assuming that he didn't buy carbon credits off of Al Gore.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Discuss.
You ever heard of Americas Most Wanted. There are people everywhere we can't catch RIGHT NOW. But who knows, we might catch that little B@$TERD SOONER OR LATER, AND WHEN WE DO MAYBE HE WILL MEET SADAM IN THAT GREAT PLACE.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Discuss.
Because he's hiding.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Discuss.
Because he does not exist.

You know .... like WMDs in Iraq. If you cant find it, it does not exist. In fact he was never there. Bush made it up.

Is'nt that what the RHP fools say ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
He had 3 chances and each were cancelled at the last minue because of concerns of killing innocent people and the backlash that would have resulted.

Democrats don't want to kill 1 bad guy if it means killing 10 innocent people.

Republicans don't mind killing 10 innocent people if it means killing 1 bad guy
the last one to pull back at the last minute was rumsfeld.