1. Joined
    09 Jul '10
    Moves
    720
    17 Sep '10 10:17
    Originally posted by Palynka
    So the biggest drop in gold was the 1979 oil crisis and yet he says it's a good "hedge"? Haha!

    His arguments actually defend that gold rises in the run-up to a crisis (see his comments about trust in IOUs) because people don't know where to put their money. This means you get high volatility in gold during crisis (fast rises followed by fast drops). That' ...[text shortened]... ppens in any bubble. Like the musical chairs, the last one to stop dancing is going out.
    If you are long-term hedger, then temporary volatility is irrelevant.

    The price of all investments, not just gold, is partly the product of reflexive psychology. That reflexive psychology affects price does not mean fundamentals are not also or primarily determinants of the prices.

    Gold can't be printed on demand. That's a good reason to own it in an era of money supply expansion and looming currency crises due to excessive borrowing. You can't debase gold like you can other currencies.
  2. Joined
    09 Jul '10
    Moves
    720
    17 Sep '10 10:21
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    A bubble does not depend on how many people are investing in it, just that significantly more are investing compared to a previous situation.
    Well, gold can't be that big a bubble if it's only a sideline investment.

    I think it more likely that other currencies are deflating bubbles.

    I guess we'll see.
  3. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    17 Sep '10 10:342 edits
    Originally posted by IshDaGegg
    Well, gold can't be that big a bubble if it's only a sideline investment.

    I think it more likely that other currencies are deflating bubbles.

    I guess we'll see.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_Mania

    Do not underestimate the irrationality of people. And as Warren Buffett said: "be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful."
  4. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    17 Sep '10 10:54
    Originally posted by IshDaGegg
    If you are long-term hedger, then temporary volatility is irrelevant.

    The price of all investments, not just gold, is partly the product of reflexive psychology. That reflexive psychology affects price does not mean fundamentals are not also or primarily determinants of the prices.

    Gold can't be printed on demand. That's a good reason to own it in an ...[text shortened]... rency crises due to excessive borrowing. You can't debase gold like you can other currencies.
    Just to be clear, what are you hedging in that long-term?

    Because you seem to think a given asset or commodity can be a good hedge...in general. But I don't even know what that means.
  5. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    17 Sep '10 13:53
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_Mania

    Do not underestimate the irrationality of people. And as Warren Buffett said: "be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful."
    Nobody doubts the existence of irrational behavior and bubbles.

    The question is where is the best place to invest your money. One could argue there is no other decent place to invest than precious metals right now.
  6. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    17 Sep '10 13:59
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    Nobody doubts the existence of irrational behavior and bubbles.

    The question is where is the best place to invest your money. One could argue there is no other decent place to invest than precious metals right now.
    Following Warren's advice, you should put your money in an undervalued asset, an asset which is viewed much more pessimistically than is reasonable. That's not gold, of course. Perhaps PIIGS bonds, though that is risky and I'm not adequately aware of the risk to judge properly whether it would be a good investment.
  7. Joined
    08 Oct '08
    Moves
    5542
    17 Sep '10 15:12
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    Following Warren's advice, you should put your money in an undervalued asset, an asset which is viewed much more pessimistically than is reasonable. That's not gold, of course. Perhaps PIIGS bonds, though that is risky and I'm not adequately aware of the risk to judge properly whether it would be a good investment.
    might be a good time to invest in real estate.
  8. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    17 Sep '10 18:39
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100917/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/us_economy
  9. Standard memberMacSwain
    Who is John Galt?
    Taggart Comet
    Joined
    11 Jul '07
    Moves
    6816
    19 Sep '10 13:56
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    Why were they so wrong and how high can gold go from here?
    Gold will reach £1600 before gold will revert to £200 again.
  10. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    19 Sep '10 14:42
    Originally posted by MacSwain
    Gold will reach £1600 before gold will revert to £200 again.
    No no... it will reach £1567.32, and then revert to £212.89.
  11. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    19 Sep '10 14:44
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    No no... it will reach £1567.32, and then revert to £212.89.
    While you're at it, will Umar bowl a no ball on the 3rd ball of his 4th over... by any remote chance?
  12. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    19 Sep '10 14:49
    Originally posted by FMF
    While you're at it, will Umar bowl a no ball on the 3rd ball of his 4th over... by any remote chance?
    No, but he will score a hattrick of 147s in the second set of the game, as he touchdowns with a 9-darter.
  13. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    19 Sep '10 18:091 edit
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    A bubble does not depend on how many people are investing in it, just that significantly more are investing compared to a previous situation.
    I thought a bubble was when the price of a commodity was significantly higher because people were investing it thus increasing its value significantly above its 'true' value.
    Am I totally wrong about this? I am not an economist.

    If every one sold their stock of gold, then presumably some businesses would still be buying gold for actual non-investment uses. But the price would drop significantly.
    Similarly a house is seen as having some value other than pure investment value and you may choose to keep your house whatever the current price.

    But if you define a bubble the way you did, then there is no guarantee that it will burst, and no real indication of what will happen if it does. Why should it price go back to former levels? It could go much lower if investors loose all faith in gold, or it could stay high if investors consider it a better long term investment than other options (such as currency).
  14. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    19 Sep '10 18:25
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    I thought a bubble was when the price of a commodity was significantly higher because people were investing it thus increasing its value significantly above its 'true' value.
    Am I totally wrong about this? I am not an economist.

    If every one sold their stock of gold, then presumably some businesses would still be buying gold for actual non-investment ...[text shortened]... if investors consider it a better long term investment than other options (such as currency).
    There is never a "guarantee" that bubbles burst. Also, bubbles may burst quite slowly if the commodity is only moderately overvalued.
  15. Joined
    09 Jul '10
    Moves
    720
    19 Sep '10 19:17
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_Mania

    Do not underestimate the irrationality of people. And as Warren Buffett said: "be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful."
    Another sign of a bubble is irrational exuberance.

    Cue: tulips, property, dot-coms.

    But this does not currently exist in the case of gold. If there is anything irrational driving up the price, it is irrational caution. Has there ever been another bubble inflated by irrational caution?

    Even if there has been, I also cannot see why the caution is irrational this time around.

    It's a case of being fearful when others are being complacent.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree