2 edits
@shallow-blue saidAre you suggesting the Spanish weren’t bloodthirsty? Wow you Nordics really do reject history (because they have so little of it they say)
Judging from your posting history, I can only assume the cannibalistic Azteca.
@shallow-blue saidOk so you’re a pretentious douche who fails to appreciate the enormous variety in culture. Yes, the chav is just as much an element of English culture as is Shakespeare. The study of human culture is very important and useful and is not limited to watching opera and quoting ancient philosophers.
Judging from your posting history, I can only assume the cannibalistic Azteca.
There's clearly nothing of the culture of Cicero, Boethius or Virgilius in you, let alone Augustine or Lucian. All of those were appreciative of the input of other cultures (even if only Greek) into Rome; whereas you clearly believe that the only real culture, and the only heir of [i]lingu ...[text shortened]... d child of the Spanish bastard child of Rome.
Your people? I'm not sure you have a people at all.
@shallow-blue said
Judging from your posting history, I can only assume the cannibalistic Azteca.
There's clearly nothing of the culture of Cicero, Boethius or Virgilius in you, let alone Augustine or Lucian. All of those were appreciative of the input of other cultures (even if only Greek) into Rome; whereas you clearly believe that the only real culture, and the only heir of [i]lingu ...[text shortened]... d child of the Spanish bastard child of Rome.
Your people? I'm not sure you have a people at all.
lingua latina
Oh look you’re implying latinas have some relation to Ancient Rome I guess we agree after all