@kevcvs57 saidIt's what I always say when I'm talking about the rich English culture of London being replaced with the new multi cultural crap that London has become.
“ London has Fallen 😔”
Then why this statement 💩 for brains
Do the new immigrants appreciate the old history of London? Nope.
Do the new immigrants abandon their old way and live like an Englishman? Nope.
They just move there and turn neighborhoods into their neighborhoods.
I would absolutely love to dress up like an Englishman from the 1800's and walk around talking in my well trained English accent while visiting the old places and getting drunk and chased by the peelers.
Any immigrants you know would do something like that because they love the history of London?
No, you don't.
@beowulf saidLondon was originally Roman not English. That’s right Latinos founded another of your peoples’ great cities.
It's what I always say when I'm talking about the rich English culture of London being replaced with the new multi cultural crap that London has become.
Do the new immigrants appreciate the old history of London? Nope.
Do the new immigrants abandon their old way and live like an Englishman? Nope.
They just move there and turn neighborhoods into their neighborhoods.
I ...[text shortened]... nts you know would do something like that because they love the history of London?
No, you don't.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@athousandyoung saidRomans were not Latinos.
London was originally Roman not English. That’s right Latinos founded another of your peoples’ great cities.
Mexicans, etc, are Latinos.
Romans were EUROPEANS.
Got it?
You actually taught high school classes at Animo Inglewood?
Is that place still in business?
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@athousandyoung saidThat doesn't make them Latin.
Hispanic Mexicans kneel in homage to ROME every Sunday for a reason - direct cultural link through the Latin Spanish side.
Or white.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@athousandyoung saidThree times a liar, I see...
London was originally Roman not English. That’s right Latinos founded another of your peoples’ great cities.
London was founded by Celts before being raped and stolen by the Romans.
Rome wasn't even remotely "Latino" in the meaning that that word has in your Mehican rape-country.
And the "Roman" army which conquered Brittannia Maior and took over London was hardly all-Italian. There were many Gauls, Iberians, Moors, Dacians, and whatever not in it.
Your own people had nothing whatsoever to do with it. They didn't even exist back then.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@athousandyoung saidThe only sliver of truth in that - and a very thin sliver it is - is the Latin language. None of your actual heritage, neither cultural nor genetic, has the slightest to do with the people who ran the Roman Empire.
Latins - or Latinos in their languages - came from Italy and conquered Iberia and then much of the Americas. That’s why it’s called Latin America!
@shallow-blue saidThere was no evidence of any permanent Celtic settlements at the location the Romans placed their first castrum there in what is now known as “The Square Mile”.
Three times a liar, I see...
London was founded by Celts before being raped and stolen by the Romans.
Rome wasn't even remotely "Latino" in the meaning that that word has in your Mehican rape-country.
And the "Roman" army which conquered Brittannia Maior and took over London was hardly all-Italian. There were many Gauls, Iberians, Moors, Dacians, and whatever not in it.
Your own people had nothing whatsoever to do with it. They didn't even exist back then.
And don’t try and give me “the Romans destroyed the old site” there are all kinds of extensively fortified hillfort towns all over Britain e.g. Dorchester. Indigenous Britons did not found cities on low altitude seaports intended for large scale trade and transport to the continent they built their cities around defensive hillforts.
@shallow-blue saidWho are my people?
Three times a liar, I see...
London was founded by Celts before being raped and stolen by the Romans.
Rome wasn't even remotely "Latino" in the meaning that that word has in your Mehican rape-country.
And the "Roman" army which conquered Brittannia Maior and took over London was hardly all-Italian. There were many Gauls, Iberians, Moors, Dacians, and whatever not in it.
Your own people had nothing whatsoever to do with it. They didn't even exist back then.
At which point did the people who called themselves Latin stop being “real” Latins? Was it before 500, or before 1000, or was Hernan Cortes a true son of Rome? When did this ancestry change?
Who ARE my ancestors since you know so much? Please, enlighten me.
I have good reason to believe I’m not ethnic Tongva so….what then?
Some elements of Latin culture include the old Roman gods and then Roman Catholicism, imperialism, cultural diversity and the founding of cities, wheat bread and wine, Latin based Romance languages, cities built in rectangular blocks, aqueducts, paved roads, plumbing, the word “castle” (or Castile, -chester) based on the legion’s Castrum, large scale, disciplined armies, written records…
So who was it that maintained these cultural characteristics? The English didn’t bring this stuff to California. They did vastly improve the Port of Los Angeles but that’s because they are Viking pirates who are masters of all things naval.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
1 edit
@athousandyoung saidJudging from your posting history, I can only assume the cannibalistic Azteca.
Who are my people?
There's clearly nothing of the culture of Cicero, Boethius or Virgilius in you, let alone Augustine or Lucian. All of those were appreciative of the input of other cultures (even if only Greek) into Rome; whereas you clearly believe that the only real culture, and the only heir of lingua latina, is the Mexican bastard child of the Spanish bastard child of Rome.
Your people? I'm not sure you have a people at all.
@shallow-blue saidNah wrong phenotype I look like Emilio Estevez
Judging from your posting history, I can only assume the cannibalistic Azteca.