Originally posted by SuzianneKool-Aid?
Keep drinking that Kool-Aid.
Are you seriously that disconnected from reality?
Seriously?
Just take the issue of gay marriage--- regardless of yours or anyone else's take on it.
This person stated she was against gay marriage.
At a later space and time, this person stated she was for gay marriage.
This person was asked if she simply changed her mind for political expediency.
This person claims she never changed her mind, but instead insisted she always saw things the exact same as her most recent position on the topic.
Logically speaking, only a few scenarios are possible.
Either this person was never against gay marriage, or
This person was always for gay marriage, or
This person... sorry, my brain just pulled a hammy.
There is no logical way for this person to be both for and against gay marriage, and equally confounding, there is no logical way for this person to both have changed her position as well as always never changed her position.
The topic is not important in the scheme of things.
It could have been literally any topic on the face of the planet.
For her to have clearly said the things she said and then to claim she always said something in total opposition to that position is a logical impossibility.
Period.
Full stop.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHOMG, someone's opinions evolved.
Kool-Aid?
Are you seriously that disconnected from reality?
Seriously?
Just take the issue of gay marriage--- regardless of yours or anyone else's take on it.
This person stated she was against gay marriage.
At a later space and time, this person stated she was for gay marriage.
This person was asked if she simply changed her mind for political exped ...[text shortened]... omething in total opposition to that position is a logical impossibility.
Period.
Full stop.
Alert the media!
