@earl-of-trumps saidWell, well, glad to see that
This is not hard to explain, Jimm.
I don't like Joe Biden but I do appreciate his new policy with Cuba. No mystery. 😏
you've finally come around on Cuba.
In spite of everything, our ties to Cuba
are many and, at the end of the day, the real
victims in our feud with Cuba are the citizens, on both sides.
2 edits
@earl-of-trumps saidNO THEY DID NOT....SHOW ME EVIDENCE......LIKE THIS
@jimm619 says -
While OBAMA was being sworn in, Mitch McConnell called a GOP meeting where, he announced, that the NUMBER ONE PRIORITY of The GOP would be to make OBAMA a one term president, and instructed his colleagues to oppose every plan that OBAMA put forward. Not to support OUR PRESIDENT and honestly debate the issues. This is a documented fact.
[b]Does ...[text shortened]... ? The goddamm dems impeached Trump *AFTER* Trump was out of office. What the TRUCK do you call that?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/when-did-mcconnell-say-he-wanted-to-make-obama-a-one-term-president/2012/09/24/79fd5cd8-0696-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_blog.html
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2010/11/04/131069048/sen-mcconnell-insists-one-term-for-obama
.............I call that ACCOUNTABILITY....hello?
...True Libertarians are ALWAYS IN FAVOR OF ACCOUNTABILITY
1 edit
@jimm619 saidAs a video-fed lib, you only watched Geraldo video. Try reading under that, or better, don't read anything. A waste of your time, it is just words. My 6 year-old can read about any words. Good for you too.
Your link only shows GERALDO, on FOX,
saying some of the same things, likely,
your pastor might say in a Sunday sermon.
NO WHERE DOES ANYONE SAY
THEY WILL TAKE AWAY YOUR HOME....'
Housing a homeless person would certainly be
an altruistic, Christian act, BUT NEVER A LEGAL MANDATE.
There ya' go again, fearmongering BS....There are many legitimate arguments
that Conservatives can make WITHOUT LYING.
Of course it could indeed become law, that houses are nationalized. Pelosi suggests nationalizing bedrooms, would that not be the obvious next step of a movement that is always moving?
A normal process for you people, it was done in Cuba, why not here? Think, Jimmm. Think. Before you speak. Just trying to be helpful.
Edit: It is so telling that devious libs, like in this case, do not use the word Nationalize, when they are thinking nationalizing.
2 edits
@averagejoe1 saidPelosi advocates no such thing...
As a video-fed lib, you only watched Geraldo video. Try reading under that, or better, don't read anything. A waste of your time, it is just words. My 6 year-old can read about any words. Good for you too.
Of course it could indeed become law, that houses are nationalized. Pelosi suggests nationalizing bedrooms, would that not be the obvious next step of a mo ...[text shortened]... ious libs, like in this case, do not use the word Nationalize, when they are thinking nationalizing.
as 'NATIONALIZATION' of housing.
Why must you CONSTANTLY LIE, LIE, LIE?
https://pelosi.house.gov/issues/housing
..........What a maroon you are.
@jimm619 said"Give homeless your spare rooms. " Look it up, California is asking of this. I am through (libs say 'done'😉 with looking things up for you!!! By golly. You see, Pelosi is from California and agrees with this idea. Look it up. But ,She would not let them in her 'spare rooms', she has about 50 of them. Would you? Why not? Why not? Or, tell us that you would. I definitely would not.
Pelosi advocates no such thing...
as 'NATIONALIZATION' of housing.
Why must you CONSTANTLY LIE?
So you want a charitable handling of these people? Stop all welfare programs, and take the money to help the 40M people with problems. everybody else go to work. I should be president.. But Sonhouse would write bad stuff about me, and with all his followers, I dont think I could weather it!!!
3 edits
@averagejoe1 said.............Now they're 'ASKING'.....?
"Give homeless your spare rooms. " Look it up, California is asking of this. I am through (libs say 'done'😉 with looking things up for you!!! By golly. You see, Pelosi is from California and agrees with this idea. Look it up. But ,She would not let them in her 'spare rooms', she has about 50 of them. Would you? Why not? Why not? Or, tell us that you would. I ...[text shortened]... house would write bad stuff about me, and with all his followers, I dont think I could weather it!!!
A coupla' posts back they were, 'GONNA' TAKE YOUR HOME.''
LYING AGAIN?
As I pointed out, helping a homeless person is
the same thing a priest might ask of you.
I've helped plenty of people, homeless and otherwise,
but you don't need to, do you, Jo?
You got yours, charity is only for bleeding heart Liberals, right, Jo?
I am always amused by the 'so called, 'Godly people,' claiming to be concerned about family values and helping their neighbor....Except when they're, ''different.''
Hey Jo, when you gonna' respond to the LINKS I POSTED?
2 edits
@jimm619 saidDonald Trump, the 45th president of the United States, was impeached for the second time on January 13, 2021, one week before his term expired
NO THEY DID NOT....SHOW ME EVIDENCE......LIKE THIS
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/when-did-mcconnell-say-he-wanted-to-make-obama-a-one-term-president/2012/09/24/79fd5cd8-0696-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_blog.html
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2010/11/04/131069048/sen-mcconnell-insists-one-term-for-obama
.............I call that ACCOUNTABILITY....hello?
...True Libertarians are ALWAYS IN FAVOR OF ACCOUNTABILITY
--------------------------
Excuse me.. Trump impeached after he had been voted out of office in the 2020 election. Long after.
@earl-of-trumps saidBut he was still in office.....This was all hashed and re-hashed
Donald Trump, the 45th president of the United States, was impeached for the second time on January 13, 2021, one week before his term expired
--------------------------
Excuse me.. Trump impeached after he had been voted out of office in the 2020 election. Long after.
over a year ago....you just getting the news?
@earl-of-trumps saidThanks, Earl. I ran out of guess with this person, the jester. Totally misses all issues. And his last one got after me personally for some reason, says I ain't charitable. He needs his nap.
Donald Trump, the 45th president of the United States, was impeached for the second time on January 13, 2021, one week before his term expired
--------------------------
Excuse me.. Trump impeached after he had been voted out of office in the 2020 election. Long after.
@jimm619 saidHey, Jimm, I know I already addressed this but I was somewhat wrong. Let me try again.
NO THEY DID NOT....SHOW ME EVIDENCE......LIKE THIS
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/when-did-mcconnell-say-he-wanted-to-make-obama-a-one-term-president/2012/09/24/79fd5cd8-0696-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_blog.html
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2010/11/04/131069048/sen-mcconnell-insists-one-term-for-obama
.............I call that ACCOUNTABILITY....hello?
...True Libertarians are ALWAYS IN FAVOR OF ACCOUNTABILITY
------------------------
Trump's 2nd impeachment was supposed to start on January 13th, one week before his term ended on Jan. 20.
But according to Wiki, "The House impeachment managers formally triggered the start of the impeachment trial on January 25 by delivering to the Senate the charge against Trump."
"At the trial, 57 senators voted "guilty", which was less than the two-thirds majority needed (67) to convict Trump, and 43 senators voted "not guilty", resulting in Trump being acquitted of the charges on February 13, 2021."
-----------------------------
Jimm, I was right! The impeachment (trial) starts when the House turns the charge over to the Senate.
And by that time, January 25, Trump was GONE. He was out on January 20.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump
------------------------------
@I-was-right!!
The dems literally started impeachment proceedings on Donald Trump *AFTER* Trump was out of office.
@earl-of-trumps saidIt doesn't matter WHEN THEY STARTED IMPEACHMENT
Hey, Jimm, I know I already addressed this but I was somewhat wrong. Let me try again.
------------------------
Trump's 2nd impeachment was supposed to start on January 13th, one week before his term ended on Jan. 20.
But according to Wiki,[i] "The House impeachment managers formally triggered the start of the impeachment trial on January 25 by delivering t ...[text shortened]...
The dems literally started impeachment proceedings on Donald Trump *AFTER* Trump was out of office.
as long as it was within the statute of limitations.
They probably could have started it a year later.
''.......High Crimes and misdemeanors..........''
Charges don't disappear.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-and-obstruction-of-justice-what-is-the-statute-of-limitations-against-donald-trump-2019-07-25/
@averagejoe1 saidI never said you, Jo, were 'uncharitable,'
Thanks, Earl. I ran out of guess with this person, the jester. Totally misses all issues. And his last one got after me personally for some reason, says I ain't charitable. He needs his nap.
can you point that out, or is it another LIE?
Conscious bothering you, Jo?
Hey, Jo,
when you gonna' respond to the links I posted?