....But, but, the WH is telling us he is a private citizen. What is it that they are trying to do to the American public? And has the FBI lost the public, that they cannot even prepare for a simple slam dunk administrative 30-minute coourt proceding? The judge threw them out of her courtroom.
By golly , more fun to go on about than solar panels.
@averagejoe1 saidDoes everyone realize that had this judge allowed the Hunter guilty plea, that it had connected to it (previously unknown to her) that he could not ever for 1000 years be prosecuted for any of the things he has done that we have been aware of? It would have all gone away. Let's say, Big-time evidence of really bad stuff could surface. It would mean nothing.
....But, but, the WH is telling us he is a private citizen. What is it that they are trying to do to the American public? And has the FBI lost the public, that they cannot even prepare for a simple slam dunk administrative 30-minute coourt proceding? The judge threw them out of her courtroom.
By golly , more fun to go on about than solar panels.
He would take the millions he has pocketed from wherever, ad maybe buy that yacht that y'all don't like.
And you would not be invited aboard.
@averagejoe1 saidTiffany Trump also received secret service protection. It's normal for children of presidents.
....But, but, the WH is telling us he is a private citizen. What is it that they are trying to do to the American public?
@AverageJoe1
Joe,
that original plea deal would also protect Hunter from future unforeseen misgivings.
Clearly, the prosecutor that approved the deal is working for the democrats here, thank god we have a daring judge. That was risky!!
@earl-of-trumps saidUnfortunately, they will go back to the drawing boards and come up with something to get an acceptable 'plea' (jesus).
@AverageJoe1
Joe,
that original plea deal would also protect Hunter from future unforeseen misgivings.
Clearly, the prosecutor that approved the deal is working for the democrats here, thank god we have a daring judge. That was risky!!
When he is able to go away into the sunset with this ill-gotten gains, nothing will have happened, except that the bastird is free. With millions, while we toil away without a father president to cover us. This all seems ok with our resident libs, have you noticed.? Not one negative comment over all these months. One of the worst TV libs said we are trying to convict him because of his father's love.
Well, gotta get back to my safe, I saw a tatooed earing guy hanging around there. Gotta watch my stuff. Dependency may be the worst of all scourges. I would rather be poor than dependent.
@earl-of-trumps saidNo, it wouldn't have:
@AverageJoe1
Joe,
that original plea deal would also protect Hunter from future unforeseen misgivings.
Clearly, the prosecutor that approved the deal is working for the democrats here, thank god we have a daring judge. That was risky!!
" When Noreika [the presiding Judge] asked whether the settlement provided Biden with general immunity from future criminal charges, including those related to those activities, the prosecution said it did not."
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/hunter-bidens-plea-deal-fail-nothing-politics-rcna96501
@no1marauder saidEXCLUSIVE: Hunter Biden's full plea deal TRANSCRIPT - and how his sneaky lawyers and prosecution team tried to hide clause giving him 'blanket immunity' in 'crazy, unprecedented' tactic until Judge Maryellen Noreika 'smelled a rat'
No, it wouldn't have:
" When Noreika [the presiding Judge] asked whether the settlement provided Biden with general immunity from future criminal charges, including those related to those activities, the prosecution said it did not."
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/hunter-bidens-plea-deal-fail-nothing-politics-rcna96501
--------------------------------
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/us-exclusive/article-12345263/[WORD TOO LONG].html
@no1marauder saidBlanket immunity
No, it wouldn't have:
" When Noreika [the presiding Judge] asked whether the settlement provided Biden with general immunity from future criminal charges, including those related to those activities, the prosecution said it did not."
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/hunter-bidens-plea-deal-fail-nothing-politics-rcna96501
@earl-of-trumps saidLegal analysis from the Daily Mail?
EXCLUSIVE: Hunter Biden's full plea deal TRANSCRIPT - and how his sneaky lawyers and prosecution team tried to hide clause giving him 'blanket immunity' in 'crazy, unprecedented' tactic until Judge Maryellen Noreika 'smelled a rat'
--------------------------------
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/us-exclusive/article-12345263/Hunter-Bidens-plea-deal-TRANSCRI ...[text shortened]... e-clause-giving-blanket-immunity-crazy-unprecedented-tactic-Judge-Maryellen-Noreika-smelled-rat.html
Ha ha.
The prosecutors made it abundantly clear at the hearing that they never agreed to any type of "blanket immunity".
I promise to stop giving you a hard time if you will be forthcoming with this argument. What is this all about, a para out of a WSJ article? You do respect WSJ, I presume?
The critical point came when the judge asked if the deal meant Hunter could still be prosecuted on other charges, such as violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Prosecutor Leo Wise said he could. Defense attorney Chris Clark said that wasn’t his understanding. If the plea didn’t give his client such immunity, then there’s no deal, said Mr. Clark.
@averagejoe1 saidThat's accurate.
I promise to stop giving you a hard time if you will be forthcoming with this argument. What is this all about, a para out of a WSJ article? You do respect WSJ, I presume?
The critical point came when the judge asked if the deal meant Hunter could still be prosecuted on other charges, such as violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Prosecutor Leo Wise said ...[text shortened]... derstanding. If the plea didn’t give his client such immunity, then there’s no deal, said Mr. Clark.
It hardly supports Earl's claim that the prosecution ever agreed to "blanket immunity", does it?
@no1marauder said“Hunter’s plea deal blanket”. I cannot link with my cellphone, but you will find many many links just by entering that in Google. Funny how they use the phrase , blanket immunity, but you think that does not exist. Someone is wrong here.
That's accurate.
It hardly supports Earl's claim that the prosecution ever agreed to "blanket immunity", does it?
@no1marauder saidOh. It supports Earl’s claim.
That's accurate.
It hardly supports Earl's claim that the prosecution ever agreed to "blanket immunity", does it?
@averagejoe1 saidBlanket immunity certainly exists.
“Hunter’s plea deal blanket”. I cannot link with my cellphone, but you will find many many links just by entering that in Google. Funny how they use the phrase , blanket immunity, but you think that does not exist. Someone is wrong here.
It just was never agreed to here by the prosecution.