Go back
I.O.U.S.A.

I.O.U.S.A.

Debates

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
26 Aug 08
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

"I.O.U.S.A. boldly examines the rapidly growing national debt and its consequences for the United States and its citizens. As the Baby Boomer generation prepares to retire, will there even be any Social Security benefits left to collect? Burdened with an ever-expanding government and military, increased international competition, overextended entitlement programs, and debts to foreign countries that are becoming impossible to honor, America must mend its spendthrift ways or face an economic disaster of epic proportions. Throughout history, the American government has found it nearly impossible to spend only what has been raised through taxes. Wielding candid interviews with both average American taxpayers and government officials, Sundance veteran Patrick Creadon (Wordplay) helps demystify the nation's financial practices and policies. The film follows U.S. Comptroller General David Walker as he crisscrosses the country explaining America's unsustainable fiscal policies to its citizens. With surgical precision, Creadon interweaves archival footage and economic data to paint a vivid and alarming profile of America's current economic situation. The ultimate power of I.O.U.S.A. is that the film moves beyond doomsday rhetoric to proffer potential financial scenarios and propose solutions about how we can recreate a fiscally sound nation for future generations. Written by Anonymous"

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0963807/plotsummary


I.O.U.S.A. Movie Trailer

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=HBo2xQIWHiM


I.O.U.S.A

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I.O.U.S.A.

********************************************************

Does anybody know why the subject of the gigantic US national debt is not a major issue in the Presidential elections ? Should it be in your view ?

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
27 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_Texas_school_district_controversy

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
28 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_Texas_school_district_controversy
.... and ?

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
29 Aug 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Not only McCain wants to cut taxes but also Obama wants to do this .... for 95 % of the Americans.

They want better education, better health care, wage war, etc etc ... the question remains: How are they going to finance these plans if nobody wants to raise taxes ?

Anybody ?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Not only McCain wants to cut taxes but also Obama wants to do this .... for 95 % of the Americans.

They want better education, better health care, wage war, etc etc ... the question remains: How are they going to finance these plans if nobody wants to raise taxes ?

Anybody ?
Ending the war in Iraq will save a couple hundred billion a year.

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
29 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Ending the war in Iraq will save a couple hundred billion a year.
Obama stated that the troops in Iraq are needed in Afghanistan. So .... the problem remains.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Obama stated that the troops in Iraq are needed in Afghanistan. So .... the problem remains.
He's stated no such thing. There's no way he's going to shift the full force from Iraq to Afghanistan. They'll be a substantial reduction in forces overseas under Obama. That will create a significant savings.

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
29 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
He's stated no such thing. There's no way he's going to shift the full force from Iraq to Afghanistan. They'll be a substantial reduction in forces overseas under Obama. That will create a significant savings.
"He's stated no such thing."

We'll see about that.

Anyway, do you think the savings coming from the plans you think will be implemented by Obama will be enough to reduce the national debt substantially ?

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
30 Aug 08
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

The huge national debt seems to be an issue of little or no importance to both Republicans and Democrates. But face it, sooner or later it will become a stone around the US's neck ... and then you'd better stay away from the water.

National Debt Clock:

$ 9,654,133,086,763.63 ( ... almost 10 trillion dollars)

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

....and it's ticking.

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107159
Clock
31 Aug 08
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
The huge national debt seems to be an issue of little or no importance to both Republicans and Democrates. But face it, sooner or later it will become a stone around the US's neck ... and then you'd better stay away from the water.
Why is it the elephant in the room? Because maybe at this stage of the game nothing and no one can do anything about it.

Whatever austerity measures are implemented will simply be a case of too much too little too late.....

So instead its steady as she goes, pick a fight with some small fry here and there to generate some cashflow**, and do everything in your power to stall the inevitable.

** I mean if you are going to go belly up anyway you may as well help some of your own fill their coffers for as long as you can. When the creditors finally arrive at least some of your buddies would have got some action.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
31 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
"He's stated no such thing."

We'll see about that.

Anyway, do you think the savings coming from the plans you think will be implemented by Obama will be enough to reduce the national debt substantially ?
No. Hopefully it could stop its immense growth and perhaps in time start retiring some of it. In the last three years of Clinton's presidency, the debt was reduced by $355 billion. http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/05/01/clinton.debt/

Granted the economy was much better than than it is now.

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
03 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
No. Hopefully it could stop its immense growth and perhaps in time start retiring some of it. In the last three years of Clinton's presidency, the debt was reduced by $355 billion. http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/05/01/clinton.debt/

Granted the economy was much better than than it is now.
No plans to implement, not from Barack not from McCain, just hope ...... oh well .....

k

Joined
24 Jun 04
Moves
9995
Clock
06 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
The huge national debt seems to be an issue of little or no importance to both Republicans and Democrates. But face it, sooner or later it will become a stone around the US's neck ... and then you'd better stay away from the water.

National Debt Clock:

$ 9,654,133,086,763.63 ( ... almost 10 trillion dollars)

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

....and it's ticking.
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Clinton improved the national debt as a function of GDP, and even began to pay off the debt by the end of his presidency. He did this by cutting wasteful military spending, and by taxing the top 1.2% of income earners whilst giving most people a tax break. Obama plans to do something similar, even though McCain (and now Palin) are telling lies saying he wants to raise taxes across the board.

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
06 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by karnachz
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Clinton improved the national debt as a function of GDP, and even began to pay off the debt by the end of his presidency. He did this by cutting wasteful military spending, and by taxing the top 1.2% of income earners whilst giving most people a tax break. Obama plans to do something similar, even though McCain (and now Palin) are telling lies saying he wants to raise taxes across the board.
.... what surprises me most is that neither candidate is seriously adressing this issue.

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
08 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

WHERE DO YOUR TAX DOLLARS GO?

The median income family in the United States paid
$2,628 in federal income taxes in 2007.

Here is how that money was spent:


Military $1,109

Health $581

Interest on Non-military Debt $269

Anti-Poverty Programs $228

Education, Training & Social Services $115

Government & Law Enforcement $102

Housing & Community Development $88

Environment, Energy & Science $69

Transportation, Commerce & Agriculture $40

International Affairs $27


Proposed Federal Spending and Tax Cuts in FY2009:

Take a look at the tax cuts for the richest 10% ....

Shame on you America !


http://www.nationalpriorities.org/auxiliary/taxday2008/999.pdf

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.