Originally posted by ivanhoeI never denied that the Admins had such an authority; I just thought it was harsh of them to give you a forum ban because of your "head exploding" incident. Call me sentimental.
No1: "I recognize that this is a privately owned site and the Admins can censor as they please, ...."
That's news coming from your mouth ..... did you change your stance fitting the occasion or is there something else going on ?
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauder
I never denied that the Admins had such an authority; I just thought it was harsh of them to give you a forum ban because of your "head exploding" incident. Call me sentimental.
You damned liar ! You change your stance the way you see fit. How many faces do you have ?
2 edits
Originally posted by ivanhoeI'm sorry, I miscounted; there are 21 threads started by you regarding the Schiavo case and/or euthanasia on pages 20-22! First few words of each title are:
You give me the evidence .... liar ! ..... compulsive liar !!
Supreme Court Denies
Schiavo's Feeding Tube
The Tunnel Vision
Terri given morfine
Michael Schiavo on Larry King
The Empire Journal
Sworn Affidavit
Poisoned Political Climate
Cynicism, Arrogance, Resentment
Shocking Allegation
Gov. Bush seeks
Fired Nurse Claims
Michael Schiavo, the Guardian
Will Terri Schiavo
Baroness Warnock
What would happen
Tom Harkin
Should the Church
Spokespersons
Schiavo case
Not dead yet
Guess you forgot.
Originally posted by no1marauderAs much as I hate to say it, ivanhoe, marauder is absolutely right on this one. I counted 18 threads that had to do with the Schiavo case directly, and another few that had to do with euthanasia in general. Didn't even realize how many threads you had posted about this until I counted them just now...
I'm sorry, I miscounted; there are 21 threads started by you regarding the Schiavo case and/or euthanasia on pages 20-22! First few words of each title are:
Supreme Court Denies
Schiavo's Feeding Tube
The Tunnel Vision
Terri given morfine
Michael Schiavo on Larry King
The Empire Jou ...[text shortened]... Spokespersons
Schiavo case
Not dead yet
Guess you forgot.
Just out of curiosity, did you get banned for this?
Also, I've always had respect for your views, but I think you're taking this marauder thing a little too far. I think your accusations might be getting a little out of hand. Especially because of these last few posts. I didnt believe it myself, but he was telling the truth about your posts. How was he lying?
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderYou wipe everything on one big heap you manipulator, you poisonous snake.
I'm sorry, I miscounted; there are 21 threads started by you regarding the Schiavo case and/or euthanasia on pages 20-22! First few words of each title are:
Supreme Court Denies
Schiavo's Feeding Tube
...[text shortened]... chiavo case
Not dead yet
Guess you forgot.
.... have you checked out how many messages were posted in those threads by OTHER posters beside me ?
Have you counted how many posts in total there are in ALL those threads ? Have you checked out and counted YOUR posts in those threads, snakehead ? All those threads were up to date discussions about hot issues that were in the news at the time or they dealt with relevant background issues.
Maybe you could also count how many threads were started by me regarding foreign politics you pig. There are many many more about politics than about Terri Schiavo. What in the world are you trying to accomplish, you dishonest swine.
Originally posted by no1marauderSince ... everytime we post.
Since when have people's posts been judged I how their political opponents judge their substantive content?? There are plenty of posters here who post cliches, platitudes, etc. but I don't see them banned. Is STANG is the same league as SVW for nonsensical drivel? This is BS.
When you reply to a post, you are judgeing that post in one form or another. You are judgeing those who posted judgeing STANG with your post here.
Did STANG really get banned?
Was a reason given? If so, I would guess it was for spamming without content .. excessive meaningless posts .. trolling for attention IMO.
I can't answer your question about 'SVW'. I'm relatively new here and am not aware of who SVW is.
But STANG was flooding the "debate" forum with oneliners, and then refusing to debate them .. just repeating the same innane oneliner.
That's called spam IMO.
1 edit
Originally posted by jammerEven a cursory review of STANG's posts will show he wasn't simply posting the same one-liner in every post. Let's stay honest here.
Since ... everytime we post.
When you reply to a post, you are judgeing that post in one form or another. You are judgeing those who posted judgeing STANG with your post here.
Did STANG really get banned?
Was a reason given? If so, I wo ...[text shortened]... just repeating the same innane oneliner.
That's called spam IMO.
Originally posted by ivanhoeNow that's what I call a post. There's real feeling here. I reckon this has got to be an eight-pinter, at the very least. More, please.
You wipe everything on one big heap you manipulator, you poisonous snake.
.... have you checked out how many messages were posted in those threads by OTHER posters beside me ?
Have you counted how many posts in total there are in ALL those threads ? Have you checked out and counted YOUR posts in those threads, snakehead ? All those threads were up to d ...[text shortened]... than about Terri Schiavo. What in the world are you trying to accomplish, you dishonest swine.
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderYou are being dishonest and a liar by adding up a number of threads that are related but are definitely NOT about the same subject.
Good then you are done making a complete fool of yourself. BelgianFreak had stated that one reason why STANG was being banned was because he had started 6 similar threads on page one; I merely pointed out that you had started o ...[text shortened]... personal vendetta is causing you to make an utter a** of yourself.
As you can see for yourself some of these threads are very extensive containing many many posts. These threads deal with related but certainly NOT the same issues. If I decided then not to open a new thread but simply decided to post in the same threads about a related issue things would have become very confused and very messy indeed.
By presenting the matter the way you did and implicitely comparing this case with another completely different case you are being dishonest and a liar ...... snakeface.
2 edits
Originally posted by ivangrice
Now that's what I call a post. There's real feeling here. I reckon this has got to be an eight-pinter, at the very least. More, please.
Thanks Ivangrice .... good to know you appreciate it 😉
By the way .... you can show your appreciation by reccing the post in question. 😀
1 edit
Originally posted by ivanhoeGrow up. Neither were STANG's threads about the exact same thing; one was about Afghanistan, one was about oil in Iraq, etc. etc. If you read BelgianFreak's post earlier in the thread you will see that he uses STANG having 6 threads on page one as a rationale for banning him for "flooding" and "spamming". It's not all about you, Ivanhoe; you're acting like a bratty six year old. I'm merely saying that someone posting multiple threads on similar or related topics has not been considered "flooding" or "spamming" in the past IF the threads were not identical. Please try to stay on-topic in the thread; if you want to start a thread ranting and raving about your deep personal dislike for a person you've never met and know very little about start a thread or 21 called "Why I Hate no1Marauder".
You are being dishonest and a liar by adding up a number of threads that are related but are definitely NOT about the same subject.
As you can see for yourself some of these threads are very extensive containing many many posts. These th ...[text shortened]... rent case you are being dishonest and a liar ...... snakeface.