Ivanhoe, I looked back a few pages, he's telling the truth, there are 18 threads in particular about Shiavo and a few more about euthanisia in general that add up to well over 20 by yourself. Sure, you can argue they are "in different flavour", but the same could be said about Stang. Sure, Stang makes 20 or so threads dissing US foreign policy, but each time, it's different section of foreign policy, in fact, Stang has a little more variety then yourself, I would say, because US foreign policy is more broad, then say, discussing a single commoner individual like Terri Shaivo. Just my two cents, if Stang goes for these reasons, then to be politicly correct, Ivanhoe must go too...
Originally posted by ivanhoeI'll use your posting habits if I think they're relevant to the discussion, Ivanhoe; I mentioned blindfaith101 and my own posts as well. You don't see BF101 or me insulting me, do ya? Or falsely claiming that I lied about the number of threads you started on a single and/or closely related subject? I enjoyed most of the Schiavo threads you started esp. the ones where you relied on "facts" from the Empire Journal, affidavits from loonies and frauds and gossip from various blogs. It was a real hoot to see where you get your information from, Ivanhoe.
Marauder: " It's not all about you, Ivanhoe"
Then please leave me out of your petty little disagreements and do not use my name again ..... snakeface.
Originally posted by jammerJammer, do you EVER having anything constructive to say? So far you preach how no-body says anything worthwhile. But i'm listening real hard and i can't hear anything other than insults coming out of your mouth.
This one makes sense to me.
Being new here I didn't realise that STANG was just another attentionwhore-spammer .. I get it now and agree .. nothing to gain from a response as all he has is repetition of the same innane platitudes, condecending BS.
I thought you had to be at least 13 to come on here.
Somebody needs to check STANGs ID.
No I didn't!
Ye ...[text shortened]... n't
Did ... ad nausum
...... you get the idea .. a childs argument without content.
AKA spam
By the way, im still laughing at your post saying RHP was banning you, and that the reason was to protect us from your wrath.
Originally posted by Shonkytonkrec
Jammer, do you EVER having anything constructive to say? So far you preach how no-body says anything worthwhile. But i'm listening real hard and i can't hear anything other than insults coming out of your mouth.
By the way, im still laughing at your post saying RHP was banning you, and that the reason was to protect us from your wrath.