Go back
Illegal to lie about election results

Illegal to lie about election results

Debates

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
29 Jan 22
2 edits

OLYMPIA – Washington can protect democracy and free speech with a new law that would make it a crime for candidates and elected officials to lie about election results, Gov. Jay Inslee said Friday.

Inslee testified in support of his proposal that would make it a gross misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in jail or a $5,000 fine, for candidates or elected officials to “knowingly, recklessly or maliciously” make false statements about election results.

To be punished under this bill, the claims must:

Be intended to incite or produce imminent lawless action or do produce such action; are made for the purpose of undermining the election process or results; and falsely claim that an elected official or candidate did not win after any lawful challenge is completed and the election results are certified. Inslee announced on the one-year anniversary of the Jan. 6 riots at the U.S. Capitol and State Capitol Campus that he would be pursuing this bill. On Friday, he called the events on Jan. 6 “a horrific insurrection” that is a “harbinger of what is to come.” “This isn’t our recent past,” Inslee said. “This is our future if we don’t act.”

Inslee said he has worked with constitutional law experts to craft the bill. He said it was very carefully written to protect the First Amendment.

George Washington University professor Catherine Ross, who helped write the language in the bill, testified in its favor Friday. Ross said after hearing about Inslee’s proposal, she wanted to help and make sure it was “done right.”

This legislation is in the works in several other blue states as well. Red states however have no problem with lawmakers lying about the outcome of elections.

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/jan/29/inslees-bill-to-make-lying-about-election-results-/

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
29 Jan 22

This doesn't go far enough. Any such lies, election or otherwise, should be just as illegal. But I'll take what we can get.

Sleepyguy
Reepy Rastardly Guy

Dustbin of history

Joined
13 Apr 07
Moves
12835
Clock
29 Jan 22

@vivify said
This doesn't go far enough. Any such lies, election or otherwise, should be just as illegal. But I'll take what we can get.
Listen to yourselves, you fascists!

Who gets to decide what is a lie and what is not? You? Some unelected bureaucrat?

If Trump wins the next election, do you want his administration to have the power to shut down your speech because he thinks you are lying? Regulate your government, idiots, not your neighbors.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
29 Jan 22

@sleepyguy said
Listen to yourselves, you fascists!

Who gets to decide what is a lie and what is not? You? Some unelected bureaucrat?

If Trump wins the next election, do you want his administration to have the power to shut down your speech because he thinks you are lying? Regulate your government, idiots, not your neighbors.
The OP refers to false claims that were "lawfully challenged" and did not win. So a legal hearing must first take place.

Read the OP next time before before embarrassing yourself like this.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Jan 22

@mchill said
OLYMPIA – Washington can protect democracy and free speech with a new law that would make it a crime for candidates and elected officials to lie about election results, Gov. Jay Inslee said Friday.

Inslee testified in support of his proposal that would make it a gross misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in jail or a $5,000 fine, for candidates or elected officials to ...[text shortened]...
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/jan/29/inslees-bill-to-make-lying-about-election-results-/
Present law is sufficient.

I expect such a law, if passed, would fail Constitutional muster.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147485
Clock
29 Jan 22

@vivify said
The OP refers to false claims that were "lawfully challenged" and did not win. So a legal hearing must first take place.

Read the OP next time before before embarrassing yourself like this.
“ The OP refers to false claims that were "lawfully challenged" and did not win. So a legal hearing must first take place. ”

this statement is a lie

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147485
Clock
29 Jan 22

@mchill said
OLYMPIA – Washington can protect democracy and free speech with a new law that would make it a crime for candidates and elected officials to lie about election results, Gov. Jay Inslee said Friday.

Inslee testified in support of his proposal that would make it a gross misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in jail or a $5,000 fine, for candidates or elected officials to ...[text shortened]...
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/jan/29/inslees-bill-to-make-lying-about-election-results-/
makes one question why are democrats our election system as is. The rules in place were not followed in the last election.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89788
Clock
29 Jan 22

@sleepyguy said
Listen to yourselves, you fascists!

Who gets to decide what is a lie and what is not? You? Some unelected bureaucrat?

If Trump wins the next election, do you want his administration to have the power to shut down your speech because he thinks you are lying? Regulate your government, idiots, not your neighbors.
What?
Well, somethings are verifiably true. And somethings are just complete and utter bollocks.

It’s not really rocket science.
You can claim that the planet is flat. It’s just not.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
30 Jan 22

@shavixmir said bollocks
That actually set off RHP's alert?

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20433
Clock
30 Jan 22

it's likely unconstitutional.

what if the charges of cheating were quite real? then the election cheat would get protection from the law.
Is that what people really want? I don't think so. As is, people can say as they wish and let it be proven.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37310
Clock
30 Jan 22

@vivify said
That actually set off RHP's alert?
He hardly swore at all they are probably checking to make sure no one has hacked his account.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22644
Clock
30 Jan 22

@mchill said
OLYMPIA – Washington can protect democracy and free speech with a new law that would make it a crime for candidates and elected officials to lie about election results, Gov. Jay Inslee said Friday.

Inslee testified in support of his proposal that would make it a gross misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in jail or a $5,000 fine, for candidates or elected officials to ...[text shortened]...
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/jan/29/inslees-bill-to-make-lying-about-election-results-/
Sounds like questioning any election result is considered a lie. What about when a real election fraud outcome happens? The truth will be considered a lie. Right?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22644
Clock
30 Jan 22

@earl-of-trumps said
it's likely unconstitutional.

what if the charges of cheating were quite real? then the election cheat would get protection from the law.
Is that what people really want? I don't think so. As is, people can say as they wish and let it be proven.
Exactly.
And who determines if it is a lie or not? This is a very real threat to democracy if we actually have one, but I doubt that. The majority are not being represented in government and it is obvious. The wealthy minority determine policy.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37310
Clock
30 Jan 22

@metal-brain said
Sounds like questioning any election result is considered a lie. What about when a real election fraud outcome happens? The truth will be considered a lie. Right?
No I suggest you and earl read the thread post again. It’s not and never will be illegal to tell the truth about any given election results.
It’s also never going to effect you, Earl or me because we are not candidates or elected officials.
The Tea Party and it’s opportunistic Republican politicos have made it necessary by calling into question the validity of democratic elections themselves.
It’s already been mentioned that no democrat voter is ever going to respect or believe the result of any election that they do not win and why should they?

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
30 Jan 22

@metal-brain said
Exactly.
And who determines if it is a lie or not?
Like the OP says: a "legal challenge" must be made. So this will be determined in the courts. For example, when Trump lost 60 different legal challenges, including from the Supreme Court.

Conservatives are quite amusingly pretending they didn't see the OP mention this. Probably because Trump's SIXTY losses still stings.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.