Go back
Imagine if you will...

Imagine if you will...

Debates

Clock

marerider#1, suzy, kev ect...Trying AVEJOE...

only they could say anything...Earl, AVEJOE wajoma ect and myself could not comment...

that is the J6 committee in a nutshell

Clock

@Mott-The-Hoople
You really need to up your Alzheimer's meds, you are starting to babble, AGAIN.

Clock
1 edit

I understand what he is saying, @sonhouse. You just don't get it.

It's like a grand jury indictment. The jurors only hear the prosecutor's side of things, never the Defendant's.
And that is what is going on within the J6 hearings

Clock
2 edits

@earl-of-trumps said
I understand what he is saying, @sonhouse. You just don't get it.

It's like a grand jury indictment. The jurors only hear the prosecutor's side of things, never the Defendant's.
And that is what is going on within the J6 hearings
No your right earl, mott is far too subtle and introspective for us.
If he’s on trial for being a right wing dung beetle then we have him ‘bang to rights’, we would just show the jury some of the crap Joe posts and he’s going down for a very long time.
What’s motts point.

Clock

@sonhouse said
@Mott-The-Hoople
You really need to up your Alzheimer's meds, you are starting to babble, AGAIN.
Sonhouse you have had a nice rest. Could you digress for a moment from the jester world, and 'talk' like we were sitting at Starbucks?
I do not follow it at all, but I saw snippets about there only being 'one side', sort of like an inquisition. If that is the case, of course I as a fair-minded conservative, find it unbalanced and unfair, thus vapid. Nothing. No rebuttals?? No nothing? Tell us why you have your heart and soul in such a hearing. If we jumped all over Hunter, which I guess we will, what if we shut your side out of the ........inquisition? Can you be honest with an answer?

Clock

@kevcvs57 said
No your right earl, mott is far too subtle and introspective for us.
If he’s on trial for being a right wing dung beetle then we have him ‘bang to rights’, we would just show the jury some of the crap Joe posts and he’s going down for a very long time.
What’s motts point.
What is yours, for God sakes. You fellers get so angry. Maybe Sonhouse will prevail here? Not you.; Next you will overloading the Forum with links.

Clock

@averagejoe1 said
What is yours, for God sakes. You fellers get so angry. Maybe Sonhouse will prevail here? Not you.; Next you will overloading the Forum with links.
๐Ÿ˜ข๐Ÿ˜ข

Clock

@mott-the-hoople said
marerider#1, suzy, kev ect...Trying AVEJOE...

only they could say anything...Earl, AVEJOE wajoma ect and myself could not comment...

that is the J6 committee in a nutshell
What are you on about?
They’re interviewing tons of republicans. Even family members of trump… and they’re all saying the same thing.

Ergo: trump is guilty as hell.

Clock

@mott-the-hoople said
marerider#1, suzy, kev ect...Trying AVEJOE...

only they could say anything...Earl, AVEJOE wajoma ect and myself could not comment...

that is the J6 committee in a nutshell
All the witnesses under sworn testimony are Republican.

Clock

@earl-of-trumps said
I understand what he is saying, @sonhouse. You just don't get it.

It's like a grand jury indictment. The jurors only hear the prosecutor's side of things, never the Defendant's.
And that is what is going on within the J6 hearings
Any DA will tell you,
''I can get an indictment against a ham sandwich.''
Personal injury lawyers, in Federal cases, like to get their cases
in front of a Midwestern jury, where the monetary awards are traditionally higher.
...................Lotsa' factoids floatin' around on a hypothetical,
what is the point here?....Guess I don't get it either.

Clock

@Mott-The-Hoople
Last time I checked, this is not a court trial. It's a hearing.
If the GOP wanted to after a Dem in future, it wouldn't look too different.
What the Dems are doing is trying to prevent another "Lewandowski fiasco" that happened a while back.

Clock

@mghrn55 said
@Mott-The-Hoople
Last time I checked, this is not a court trial. It's a hearing.
If the GOP wanted to after a Dem in future, it wouldn't look too different.
What the Dems are doing is trying to prevent another "Lewandowski fiasco" that happened a while back.
Dunno', all they do is interview REPUBLICANS and
there are two REPUBLICANS sitting on the committee.
Rep McCarthy could have seated more sympathetic GOP members
but he chose not to....I'm sure he realizes now that he blundered.
Fact is, the 2 REPUBLICANS, all the DEMOCRATS and even
ALL THE REPUBLICAN WITNESSES seem to be in agreement/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kevin-mccarthy-jan-6-committee-picks-removed-pelosi-rejects-jim-jordan-jim-banks/
https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/14/politics/fact-check-mccarthy-january-6-committee-pelosi/index.html

Clock
1 edit

Everyone here is saying that this hearing is evenly balanced, implying that it is similar to a trial. I’m just typing this sentence for myself, to slide into my journal, carry on.

Clock

It's a retard show. ๐Ÿคจ

Clock

@averagejoe1 said
Everyone here is saying that this hearing is evenly balanced, implying that it is similar to a trial. I’m just typing this sentence for myself, to slide into my journal, carry on.
I'm just curious.....
What would the people you claim have been silenced say ??
Just curious.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.