05 Apr '12 01:57>
It’s time the U.S. started using instant runoff voting, as Democrats know from the Gore-Bush-Nader election results, and as Republicans (should) know by now from the Republican primaries.
Look at the following example, from a hypothetical Republican primary in a conservative state.
Under a standard, plurality voting system...
40% Romney
35% Santorum
20% Gingrich
5% Paul
...Romney wins. The end.
But, under an instant-runoff voting system...
(First round--no majority achieved)
40% Romney
35% Santorum
20% Gingrich
5% Paul
(Second round--no majority achieved)
44% Romney (second choice for 80% of Paul supporters)
35% Santorum (second choice for 0% of Paul supporters)
21% Gingrich (second choice for 20% of Paul supporters)
(Third round--majority achieved)
45% Romney (second choice for 80% of Paul supporters, third choice for other 20% of Paul supporters)
55% Santorum (second choice for 100% of Gingrich supporters)
This eliminates complaints everyone’s heard of to the effect that “a majority of voters prefer an alternative to Mitt Romney.”
Benefits in general:
1) Eliminates “strategic voting.” In other words, you can vote for who you want to without fear of your vote “going to waste.”
2) Reduces negative campaigning. For example, Romney would have had an incentive not to criticize Gingrich as much, in hopes that Gingrich’s supporters would choose him as their second choice.
Any objections?
Look at the following example, from a hypothetical Republican primary in a conservative state.
Under a standard, plurality voting system...
40% Romney
35% Santorum
20% Gingrich
5% Paul
...Romney wins. The end.
But, under an instant-runoff voting system...
(First round--no majority achieved)
40% Romney
35% Santorum
20% Gingrich
5% Paul
(Second round--no majority achieved)
44% Romney (second choice for 80% of Paul supporters)
35% Santorum (second choice for 0% of Paul supporters)
21% Gingrich (second choice for 20% of Paul supporters)
(Third round--majority achieved)
45% Romney (second choice for 80% of Paul supporters, third choice for other 20% of Paul supporters)
55% Santorum (second choice for 100% of Gingrich supporters)
This eliminates complaints everyone’s heard of to the effect that “a majority of voters prefer an alternative to Mitt Romney.”
Benefits in general:
1) Eliminates “strategic voting.” In other words, you can vote for who you want to without fear of your vote “going to waste.”
2) Reduces negative campaigning. For example, Romney would have had an incentive not to criticize Gingrich as much, in hopes that Gingrich’s supporters would choose him as their second choice.
Any objections?