@Earl-of-Trumps saidI think it's too late, in regards to North Korea. (This is not to say I support the current action against Iran).
Perhaps someone can explain this to our "America First" President. As of two weeks ago:
Iran: No nuclear missiles or bombs, and no way to reach America
North Korea: 50 ICBM's capable of reaching America.
For example, say I had two foes and didn't want either of them to have a knife, in case they attacked me with it. The first, Jeremy, aspired to have one, while Keith had already acquired one and carried it in his pocket, ready to use. - Now, although Keith was clearly the biggest threat, it would be self defeating and unwise to take any direct action against Keith (as he would likely be provoked into using the weapon he already had) while action against Jeremy, to stop him getting a weapon, might have some sense to it.
Jeremy is also a marginally worst name.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidKeith does not know how to use the knife properly, and is not suicidal.
I think it's too late, in regards to North Korea. (This is not to say I support the current action against Iran).
For example, say I had two foes and didn't want either of them to have a knife, in case they attacked me with it. The first, Jeremy, aspired to have one, while Keith had already acquired one and carried it in his pocket, ready to use. - Now, although Ke ...[text shortened]... o stop him getting a weapon, might have some sense to it.
Jeremy is also a marginally worst name.
Jeremy is both stupid and insane. He is the dangerous one.
@Suzianne saidWhat has this post got to do w this?
Just like charter schools in the US, with the added 'feature' that there's no actual learning going on. Just an entire generation engineered to believe that the proper place for religion is in our schools. Talk about promoting dumbassery to keep us all down under the thumb of the Trumpublicans.
@Earl-of-Trumps saidMuslims are relevant littllle feller. They even preach having 11 children or some such. Purpose to overwhelm and kill us the infidels. Korea has no such mantra… that should answer your question and stop these silly posts.
I'm not sure that your question has any relevance, but thanks for playing "Jeopardy"
@Suzianne saidThen there’s this one, who mentions the word ‘respect’ in the same sentence as Iran. It took Churchill to train you losers about respecting Hitler, which is why you have remained losers to this day.
It used to be that diplomacy was the way forward.
Now all Trump does is insult every single world leader.
If we don't want to 'get nuked', then maybe we should treat others as equals?
You know, mutual respect?
Ghost also thinks diplomacy with Iran is possible. Another wasted post, you liberals have nothing. Absolutely nothing, we need to eradicate them like rats, which frankly is the only way.
@Martin saidOur threats are lunatics among us like Schumer, Hakeem,, Oman, and all of those people it will weaken the society for one purpose, which used to get rid of Trump. The we will pay if they do that will be tremendous. …Kamala knows absolutely nothing about anything. She is a clap trap. Yet they have no men in their party and we could end up with her, but isn’t it more important to get rid of Trump? !!!!!! since they are already gonna lose Trump after 2028, why do they stay on his ass? Probably because he will still run this country no matter who the president is. I certainly hope so.
I refer to the opening statement for this thread:
and I quote
"Iran or North Korea? Who Was More Dangerous To America"
May I suggest the lunatic in charge of the asylum; the one at home?
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidKeith's madness affects no one but his own people, and they seem quite happy, since there are very few defections.
You don't think Keith is a little bit mad and unpredictable?
Jeremey's madness affects the whole world.
@Martin saidSorry, it’s easily Iran for many reasons that should be easy to see, and nice humor at the end. One other thing also, NK has a superpower daddy right beside them in charge. Unless a WW3 situation I doubt China would allow that next door, and we wouldn’t attack first unless a ww3 situation.
I refer to the opening statement for this thread:
and I quote
"Iran or North Korea? Who Was More Dangerous To America"
May I suggest the lunatic in charge of the asylum; the one at home?
1 edit
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidKeith has a handler, do you think China wants the return nukes coming back towards them, or the fallout not to mention Russia. Iran has been attacking and killing around the world and us since I was a boy remembering the hostages, terrorist attacks, and proxies they support. Burning our flag screaming death to America. Are you old enough to remember attacks on your own country and attacks around the world, do you remember this happening with Nk?
And Keith's unpredictability?
Bad enough with a knife, but a nuclear weapon?
@Earl-of-Trumps saidPlain English would be…..at this time, Iran military, and all that goes with it, has been fairly decimated, but we are not yet convinced that the uranium enrichment has been totally stopped. So we consider them a nuclear threat. One thermos- full could wipe out a city you see.
Perhaps someone can explain this to our "America First" President. As of two weeks ago:
Iran: No nuclear missiles or bombs, and no way to reach America
North Korea: 50 ICBM's capable of reaching America.
So at this time, considering immediate threat, I would say Iran should be number one on our list… Which it is… Because Trump is real smart. He knows about Korean ICBM’s, but has reached a conclusion that Iran is an immediate threat. There have been no rumblings from Korea., And frankly, I am sure we have a shield set up if that happened.
Kindergarten stuff
@mike69 saidNK knows that if they pulled any shenanigans that Xi doesn't like, they could be reduced to dust inside a half-hour.
Sorry, it’s easily Iran for many reasons that should be easy to see, and nice humor at the end. One other thing also, NK has a superpower daddy right beside them in charge. Unless a WW3 situation I doubt China would allow that next door, and we wouldn’t attack first unless a ww3 situation.