1. Pepperland
    Joined
    30 May '07
    Moves
    12892
    25 May '09 17:18
    Originally posted by FMF
    Do you propose "non-laissez faire" regulation of who "laissez faire" is in the hands of?
    I propose some regulation, yes.

    Isn't it obvious that laizez faire capitalism doesn't work?
  2. Joined
    10 May '09
    Moves
    13341
    25 May '09 17:26
    Originally posted by utherpendragon
    A little premature dont you think? What makes you think he could be even more than mediocre at best? What has he done in your opinion thus far that would get him even in the running? And when you say one of the greatest whose company would he be in?
    It is too early to tell. That's why I left it open to opinion based predictions between one of the greatest and the greatest of all time.
  3. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    25 May '09 21:00
    Originally posted by Sam The Sham
    Let's see how much our dollar is worth in four years before gushing on about how great Obama is.
    You mean the dollar is going to be worth something in 4 years? 😛


    I say he may time things so that he will get reelected in 4 years. Ever thought about that?
  4. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    25 May '09 21:04
    Originally posted by generalissimo
    I propose some regulation, yes.

    Isn't it obvious that laizez faire capitalism doesn't work?
    That is why people who abide by the gospel of capitalism or of socialism or of any other kind of "ism" are so dangerous. That is part of why "W" failed. He was against regulation in principle because he viewed it as a conservative principle. However, he then ignored the principles of conservatism by spending us into the ground. As we can see, here is a man sold on the wrong set of conservative principles while ignoring others. Regulation is nothing more than a set of checks and balances that was set in place by the Founding Fathers. I think even they would recognize the wisdom in setting up regulatory checks in balances in the business world.
  5. Pepperland
    Joined
    30 May '07
    Moves
    12892
    26 May '09 16:23
    Originally posted by whodey
    That is why people who abide by the gospel of capitalism or of socialism or of any other kind of "ism" are so dangerous. That is part of why "W" failed. He was against regulation in principle because he viewed it as a conservative principle. However, he then ignored the principles of conservatism by spending us into the ground. As we can see, here is a ma ...[text shortened]... ould recognize the wisdom in setting up regulatory checks in balances in the business world.
    Agreed.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree