Go back
Is it just me …

Is it just me …

Debates

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
142d

… or do Republicans suddenly seem to be really really really really upset, that the most terrible, awful, useless, incompetent, inexperienced, cackling, crazy, daughter of immigrants, black woman … has just got the nomination to run for President?

Or are they upset because she’s a successful prosecutor, attorney general of the biggest US state, previous Senator, Vise President, super-smart, articulate, erudite, engaging, charming and full of hope?

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89770
Clock
142d

@divegeester said
… or do Republicans suddenly seem to be really really really really upset, that the most terrible, awful, useless, incompetent, inexperienced, cackling, crazy, daughter of immigrants, black woman … has just got the nomination to run for President?

Or are they upset because she’s a successful prosecutor, attorney general of the biggest US state, previous Senator, Vise President, super-smart, articulate, erudite, engaging, charming and full of hope?
They’ve probably already bought their “sleepy Joe” merch and are pissed off they wasted their money.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
142d

@divegeester said
… or do Republicans suddenly seem to be really really really really upset, that the most terrible, awful, useless, incompetent, inexperienced, cackling, crazy, daughter of immigrants, black woman … has just got the nomination to run for President?

Or are they upset because she’s a successful prosecutor, attorney general of the biggest US state, previous Senator, Vise President, super-smart, articulate, erudite, engaging, charming and full of hope?
I don't think republicans are upset. They just don't like Kamala because she has a horrible record as a prosecuting attorney. Heck, even democrats thought so after Tulsi ripped into her during the primary debate.

Kamala could not dispute any of it. All she did was talk about how hard she worked and that sort of BS evasion tactic. That is because it was all true.
I think you are secretly upset you are stuck with Kamala.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54574
Clock
142d
1 edit

@divegeester said
… or do Republicans suddenly seem to be really really really really upset, that the most terrible, awful, useless, incompetent, inexperienced, cackling, crazy, daughter of immigrants, black woman … has just got the nomination to run for President?

Or are they upset because she’s a successful prosecutor, attorney general of the biggest US state, previous Senator, Vise President, super-smart, articulate, erudite, engaging, charming and full of hope?
None of the above (yall sure mention race a lot)
It is that she has voted more liberally than any person in the congress. Of all members, she is the most liberal.
If Horace McGillicutty were the most conservative person in DC and was in line to be president as is Kamala, you yourself would be 'really really upset'.
This is an example of how empty the posts of you liberals are. It is a total yawner. Do you think your post is enlightening? Your post is worse than Spuzianne's posts.

So, yeah, Divegeester, we are real real upset that someone so liberal could be president, and wrap up Obama's fundamental transformation of our 240 year old country.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
142d

@AverageJoe1 said
None of the above (yall sure mention race a lot)
It is that she has voted more liberally than any person in the congress. Of all members, she is the most liberal.
If Horace McGillicutty were the most conservative person in DC and was in line to be president as is Kamala, you yourself would be 'really really upset'.
This is an example of how empty the post ...[text shortened]... eral could be president, and wrap up Obama's fundamental transformation of our 240 year old country.
"Harris would be as bad as Obama" probably isn't a strategy the Republicans want to use.

Bringing the country into the 21st Century is a good idea.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37387
Clock
142d

@divegeester said
… or do Republicans suddenly seem to be really really really really upset, that the most terrible, awful, useless, incompetent, inexperienced, cackling, crazy, daughter of immigrants, black woman … has just got the nomination to run for President?

Or are they upset because she’s a successful prosecutor, attorney general of the biggest US state, previous Senator, Vise President, super-smart, articulate, erudite, engaging, charming and full of hope?
Yeah... they're upset.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54574
Clock
142d

@no1marauder said
"Harris would be as bad as Obama" probably isn't a strategy the Republicans want to use.

Bringing the country into the 21st Century is a good idea.
Your comments are a bit difficult to assimilate, to fully understand and apply to the debate board, when they come from someone who does not even believe that a man (think ayn rand) should not be allowed to be 100% successful and own his own business. Your philosophy has a person who strikes out for success drag along people who are dependents, impeding his progress.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
142d

@AverageJoe1 said
Your comments are a bit difficult to assimilate, to fully understand and apply to the debate board, when they come from someone who does not even believe that a man (think ayn rand) should not be allowed to be 100% successful and own his own business. Your philosophy has a person who strikes out for success drag along people who are dependents, impeding his progress.
Joe, you're too stupid to understand my political philosophy so stop making a fool of yourself by dragging it into threads that have no relation to it.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54574
Clock
142d
1 edit

@no1marauder said
Joe, you're too stupid to understand my political philosophy so stop making a fool of yourself by dragging it into threads that have no relation to it.
You are correct that I do not understand your political philosophy. You do not understand mine. So what is your point? Let us see you tell everyone here that you adhere to the philosophy of being dependent, rather than to the philosophy of self-reliance.
Books are written about self-reliance, Marauder. Please refer us to choices of books on being dependent...how to be dependent. There may be some out there, just tell us about them. You might like to do a book review!!!!

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89770
Clock
142d

@AverageJoe1 said
You are correct that I do not understand your political philosophy. You do not understand mine. So what is your point? Let us see you tell everyone here that you adhere to the philosophy of being dependent, rather than to the philosophy of self-reliance.
Books are written about self-reliance, Marauder. Please refer us to choices of books on being dependent...how ...[text shortened]... dent. There may be some out there, just tell us about them. You might like to do a book review!!!!
Atlas shrugged.
Be dependent on stupidity.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
142d

@AverageJoe1 said
You are correct that I do not understand your political philosophy. You do not understand mine. So what is your point? Let us see you tell everyone here that you adhere to the philosophy of being dependent, rather than to the philosophy of self-reliance.
Books are written about self-reliance, Marauder. Please refer us to choices of books on being dependent...how ...[text shortened]... dent. There may be some out there, just tell us about them. You might like to do a book review!!!!
Quite the opposite; you want the vast majority to be dependent on the whims and wishes of the owners of the means of production backed by force from the State.

But it's still off-topic.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
142d

@Metal-Brain said
I don't think republicans are upset. They just don't like Kamala because she has a horrible record as a prosecuting attorney.
Convictions went up under tenure.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
142d

@AverageJoe1 said
None of the above (yall sure mention race a lot)
I’ve mentioned it only once.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54574
Clock
142d

@no1marauder said
Quite the opposite; you want the vast majority to be dependent on the whims and wishes of the owners of the means of production backed by force from the State.

But it's still off-topic.
Is everyone getting these phrases?

"Owners of the Means of Production"
So, let me get this straight....If there were no such owners as our nation grew. (Henry Ford, et al) , would I be looking for a guy with a wrench to build me a car under his shade tree.? I need a car...and I need it NOW! To get to golf course.

"Backed by Force from the State".

I Don't get that one. Anybody got any ideas?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54574
Clock
142d

@divegeester said
I’ve mentioned it only once.
I said y'all. (you guys to Suzianne). She says girls can be guys.

I bet hou did not mention race in a detrimental way. I never have. Do you know one poster who has? I dont. I do know libs are hung up on it.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.