Go back
Is marriage still relevant?

Is marriage still relevant?

Debates


Marriage had use as a way of uniting tribes, sometimes kingdoms, where for most of history daughters (and sometimes sons) had no choice in the matter. Modern-day marriage involving courtship and proposal is relatively recent in human history.

But is it still something people should engage in? Given the high rate of divorce some sources siting 50% of couples get divorced (a stat that increases after first marriage) is marriage just a relic of the past? Legal battles in divorce are messy, complicated and expensive. Jeff Bezos lost $60 billion to his ex-wife.

Vote Up
Vote Down

It's cheap to get married (meaning no ceremony, just the bare-minimum justice-of-the-peace) but expensive to get divorced. I've always thought it should be the opposite: expensive to get married (proving you're very serious about it) but cheap to get out of if you're not happy.


Lets discuss this thesis:

Marriage is a way to give children security.

It is worthwhile for a child to grow up in stable social constrcts (aka marriage) so yes as long as children start from scrtahc marriage is worthwhile.

And on the cost: It feels as if marrying is cheap, but actually you give the other half of what you own and promise to give half of what you get (and of course you receive the same).
When you divorce it becomes evident what this "half" means and if you engage ina war of roses you also make the lawyers rich.
Hint: It is probably better to give a marriage counsellour a living and work on the problems (they will resurface in the next relationship).

Vote Up
Vote Down

@vivify said
Marriage had use as a way of uniting tribes, sometimes kingdoms, where for most of history daughters (and sometimes sons) had no choice in the matter. Modern-day marriage involving courtship and proposal is relatively recent in human history.

But is it still something people should engage in? Given the high rate of divorce some sources siting 50% of couples get divorced ...[text shortened]... attles in divorce are messy, complicated and expensive. Jeff Bezos lost $60 billion to his ex-wife.
I think it's largely unnecessary except from a tax and legal benefits perspective. Also, some people want to do it for religious reasons but that in that case the legal binding paperwork isn't necessary. The happiest couple I know are long term unmarried and ascribe to "conscious commitment" approaches to relationships. They've been together for over a decade.

One weird statistic on divorce: Women in unhappy marriages are much more likely to initiate divorce than men are (for college-educated couples its something like 9:1 ratio), but in non-married couples the ratio of who initiates the breakup is 1:1.


@vivify said
Marriage had use as a way of uniting tribes, sometimes kingdoms, where for most of history daughters (and sometimes sons) had no choice in the matter. Modern-day marriage involving courtship and proposal is relatively recent in human history.

But is it still something people should engage in? Given the high rate of divorce some sources siting 50% of couples get divorced ...[text shortened]... attles in divorce are messy, complicated and expensive. Jeff Bezos lost $60 billion to his ex-wife.
Research has shown that divorce among church-going [aka active, believing] Christians, in the US and other western nations, is almost zero, and in some cases and between 5 and 10%. In other cultures it is almost the smae among religious people. In India, Hindus - 2%, and Muslims about 20%. This one is only higher because of the ease of divorce in Islam, and the fact that the women gets very little.

In the west because the women get the lions share of the matrimonial assets in many cases, and because of feminism which has made many women into sluts and legal prostitutes, the divorce rate is very high, and initiated by the woman.

Trump has promised to reintroduce Christianity into schools and in government, and I think this process has already started. China has modified its stance on women getting big payouts in the event of a divorce, and this is likely to happen all over the western world. Women should not leave a marriage, especially after having affairs which destroyed the marriage, and end up with 90% of the assets.

The reason for many failed sections of society is the broken home, affairs and outside relationships which western society has condoned, fatherless children, the fall of religion. But it can be fixed.


@wildgrass said
One weird statistic on divorce: Women in unhappy marriages are much more likely to initiate divorce than men are
Well, men are overwhelming more likely to be the abusers than women, who are most often the victims of domestic violence. Victims are more likely to want to leave than the perpetrators.

I'm sure that stat of women initiating divorce would be higher if many of them weren't afraid to leave.

1 edit

@Rajk999 said
Research has shown that divorce among church-going [aka active, believing] Christians, in the US and other western nations, is almost zero, and in some cases and between 5 and 10%. In other cultures it is almost the smae among religious people. In India, Hindus - 2%, and Muslims about 20%. This one is only higher because of the ease of divorce in Islam, and the fact that th ...[text shortened]... which western society has condoned, fatherless children, the fall of religion. But it can be fixed.
Reliable estimates are that as few as 5% of Americans attend religious services on a regular basis.https://religionunplugged.com/news/2024/7/9/data-analysis-shows-as-few-as-5-of-americans-attend-church-weekly

Trying to ram your silly superstition down people's throats is unlikely to make them change their behavior.

2 edits

@Rajk999 said
Research has shown that divorce among church-going [aka active, believing] Christians, in the US and other western nations, is almost zero, and in some cases and between 5 and 10%. In other cultures it is almost the smae among religious people. In India, Hindus - 2%, and Muslims about 20%. This one is only higher because of the ease of divorce in Islam, and the fact that th ...[text shortened]... which western society has condoned, fatherless children, the fall of religion. But it can be fixed.
This doesn't really mean anything other than their religious beliefs forbid divorce. Being religious doesn't mean their marriage is happier, it only means they feel more guilty about leaving an unhappy marriage then secular people do.

Honestly, religious women tend to be even more unhappy in their marriage.


@vivify said
Well, men are overwhelming more likely to be the abusers than women, who are most often the victims of domestic violence. Victims are more likely to want to leave than the perpetrators.

I'm sure that stat of women initiating divorce would be higher if many of them weren't afraid to leave.
Is domestic violence higher in marriage? I thought it was the other way around.

1 edit

@wildgrass said
Is domestic violence higher in marriage? I thought it was the other way around.
Marriage is much harder to get out of than boyfriend/girlfriend relationships, especially if religious. A woman who is just dating can more easily leave once warning signs appear.

1 edit

@vivify said
Marriage is much harder to get out of than boyfriend/girlfriend relationships, especially if religious. A woman who is just dating can more easily leave once warning signs appear.
Yeah but the gender breakup ratio is 1:1 in non-married couples, and (at least I thought) the rates of domestic violence are also higher in non-married cohabitating or dating couples (vs. married couples).

I don't think the answer to why there is a disparity can be explained by abuse issues.


@Rajk999 said
Research has shown that divorce among church-going [aka active, believing] Christians, in the US and other western nations, is almost zero, and in some cases and between 5 and 10%. In other cultures it is almost the smae among religious people. In India, Hindus - 2%, and Muslims about 20%. This one is only higher because of the ease of divorce in Islam, and the fact that th ...[text shortened]... which western society has condoned, fatherless children, the fall of religion. But it can be fixed.
There are lots of cause-effect problems with your "research has shown" statements.


@Rajk999 said

In the west because the women get the lions share of the matrimonial assets in many cases, and because of feminism which has made many women into sluts and legal prostitutes, the divorce rate is very high, and initiated by the woman.
Feminism hasn't made many women into sluts, just many chauvinists into bitter and irrational dolts.


@vivify said

Honestly, religious women tend to be even more unhappy in their marriage.
The polls, the studies and the peer reviews of this, says the opposite.

Religious married women whose partners are religious, both have happier marriages.

1 edit

@vivify said
Marriage had use as a way of uniting tribes, sometimes kingdoms, where for most of history daughters (and sometimes sons) had no choice in the matter. Modern-day marriage involving courtship and proposal is relatively recent in human history.

But is it still something people should engage in? Given the high rate of divorce some sources siting 50% of couples get divorced ...[text shortened]... attles in divorce are messy, complicated and expensive. Jeff Bezos lost $60 billion to his ex-wife.
Marriage seems to be primarily for the purpose of spending a lot of money making the bride the center of attention. It's no longer a symbol of permanence - now it's an exercise in conspicuous consumption and ego gratification.

One of many reasons I am single. Marriage is financially destructive when it used to be financially strengthening.