Go back
Is ok to kill for your ideals?

Is ok to kill for your ideals?

Debates

L

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
7902
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Bush kills for his ideals.
Hitler killed for his ideals.
Is this ok?

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboard
Bush kills for his ideals.
Hitler killed for his ideals.
Is this ok?
Minor point--I don't think either Bush or the little corporal ever killed anyone personally.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Minor point--I don't think either Bush or the little corporal ever killed anyone personally.
I'm not sure about Hitler; he did earn an Iron Cross for heroism in World War I though I've never been able to find the exact details of what he did to earn it. GWB, of course, bravely served in the Texas Air National Guard, preventing the VC from flying their fighter planes over Waco and Amarillo.

L

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
7902
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Minor point--I don't think either Bush or the little corporal ever killed anyone personally.
If a man shoots another dead. Is the gun the murderer or the man?
I would say the man.

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
12 Sep 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
I'm not sure about Hitler; he did earn an Iron Cross for heroism in World War I though I've never been able to find the exact details of what he did to earn it. GWB, of course, bravely served in the Texas Air National Guard, preventing the VC from flying their fighter planes over Waco and Amarillo.
I'm wrong about Hitler--seems he saw heavy fighting.

"Hitler earned an Iron Cross 2nd Class in an engagement near Croonaert Wood, Wytschaete. During the fighting and under heavy fire, Hitler, now appointed Meldeganger (a dispatch runner), stumbled across a seriously wounded officer left out in the open."

"On 4 August 1918, with the Germans in the last throes of their grand offensive, Hitler received an Iron Cross 1st Class for, 'personal bravery and general merit.' He had single handily captured a group of Frenchmen huddled in a shell hole. Cunningly, Hitler had crawled to the lip of their impromptu shelter and then shouted out to the men that they were surrounded and had better surrender. Duped by his ruse, the Frenchmen came along without a fight. Once in power, the Nazi propagandists explicitly increased the number of prisoners he had captured - a mistake that the Fuhrer was happy to leave uncorrected.

The Iron Cross First Class gave Hitler the reward, recognition and the status that he had been craving for. The prize was rare for officers - but rarer still for non-commissioned ranks. It was official recognition of his bravery, honour and, at a subconscious level, racial superiority. Whilst other Nazi leaders, most notably Goering, adorned themselves with medals, tassels and shining epaulettes, Hitler simply wore his Iron Cross - it was his badge of honour."

(http://www.firstworldwar.com/features/aslowfuse.htm)

Which goes to show that Hitler's personal bravery was indeed far higher than Dubya's.

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboard
If a man shoots another dead. Is the gun the murderer or the man?
I would say the man.
Oh, Hitler & Bush are personally responsible for many deaths, whoever did the actual execution. Although I'm hard-pressed to find any ideals that I can associate with Bush, while Hitler's are well documented.

L

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
7902
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Oh, Hitler & Bush are personally responsible for many deaths, whoever did the actual execution. Although I'm hard-pressed to find any ideals that I can associate with Bush, while Hitler's are well documented.
He claims he wants to bring democracy to the world. I doubt this but it could be true.

s
Don't Like It Leave

Walking the earth.

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
50664
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sasquatch672
Second, you can't equate Hitler and Bush.
You can't equate them but you can compare them.

Hitler was by far the more talented painter.

S

Joined
07 May 04
Moves
10805
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

It's not OK to kill for your ideals, nor to do lesser things for your ideals.

People have a right to freedom.

And violence leads to violence.

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
.

People have a right to freedom.

And violence leads to violence.
People have a right to defend their life, liberty and private property by force if neccessary.

The freedom you still enjoy (It's being whittled by the collectivists, but that's another thread) is a result of brave men and women defending it. There is a moral duty to act against objective threats to our freedom.

d

Joined
24 Jan 05
Moves
408
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboard
Bush kills for his ideals.
Hitler killed for his ideals.
Is this ok?
yes it is. You only have one life to live, don't let other mess it up. Anytime your happy, there will be a balance to it. Getting true happiness means you will have to piss someone off all the time 😉

d

Joined
24 Jan 05
Moves
408
Clock
12 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
It's not OK to kill for your ideals, nor to do lesser things for your ideals.

People have a right to freedom.

And violence leads to violence.
IF everyone was good, no one would know what bad is. Then life would be dull. It makes me suicidal just thinking about it. Everything needs balance. Sometimes people need a fire lit under their butt to get up and do something.

S

Joined
07 May 04
Moves
10805
Clock
13 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by danielsmith
IF everyone was good, no one would know what bad is. Then life would be dull. It makes me suicidal just thinking about it. Everything needs balance. Sometimes people need a fire lit under their butt to get up and do something.
What's dull and boring is the news we're going to hear at least every few weeks for the next few decades about the price of oil going up ... as if we didn't see supplies of oil coming to an end and as if we didn't have a choice to develop alternatives sooner.

The real pity is that the environment will be trashed by then.

America will no longer be a super power with all its glitzy razzle dazzle hot air by then.

Just hot air, increased sea temperatures and the hurricanes that accompany them.

L

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
7902
Clock
13 Sep 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by danielsmith
Getting true happiness means you will have to piss someone off all the time 😉
How can that be? I am a very happy person but I dont think im pissing people off all the time.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.