Go back
Is there an argument for drawing lines on basis of race?

Is there an argument for drawing lines on basis of race?

Debates


The news is all about VA having 2 courts ruled that racial gerrymandering is NOT constitutional. It is institutionalized racism. Dems say the system is broken because 'we do not like the outcome"?

Secondly, if you fellers get the House, your president (you will agree that the USA needs someone to make decisions on running the USA , so that we can play chess and watch our country lead the world)...that your president will instead spend 2 years defending himself against hundreds of charges. dam

Bonus thought. After the hell of the 2 years, lets say they get 'get him' on something. Being in ruin, trying to get back on track with President AOC, does whatever happen to Trump mean a Hill Of Beans???? I mean really. The Dems are like taunting children in a playground. Get him Sonhouse!!!!! Then, what willl be your satisfaction????????


@AverageJoe1 said
The news is all about VA having 2 courts ruled that racial gerrymandering is NOT constitutional. It is institutionalized racism. Dems say the system is broken because 'we do not like the outcome"?

Secondly, if you fellers get the House, your president (you will agree that the USA needs someone to make decisions on running the USA , so that we can play chess and wat ...[text shortened]... ng children in a playground. Get him Sonhouse!!!!! Then, what willl be your satisfaction????????
Quel petit enfant tu es


@AverageJoe1 said
(you will agree that the USA needs someone to make decisions on running the USA , so that we can play chess and watch our country lead the world)...
Well the current guy is doing his best to lose that lead. Being contrary and 'ornery towards your nation's greatest allies, while cosying up to Xi and calling him a great man. Oh the ingratiation.

Part of me feels its simply because Xi is a little bigger in stature. Very WWE.


@kmax87 said
Well the current guy is doing his best to lose that lead. Being contrary and 'ornery towards your nation's greatest allies, while cosying up to Xi and calling him a great man. Oh the ingratiation.

Part of me feels its simply because Xi is a little bigger in stature. Very WWE.
Hey paradox, i think your post above was meant for this one??


@paradox4 said
Quel petit enfant tu es
Vous avez raison.👍


@paradox4 said
Quel petit enfant tu es
Je suis une baguette.


@AverageJoe1 said
The news is all about VA having 2 courts ruled that racial gerrymandering is NOT constitutional. It is institutionalized racism. Dems say the system is broken because 'we do not like the outcome"?

Secondly, if you fellers get the House, your president (you will agree that the USA needs someone to make decisions on running the USA , so that we can play chess and wat ...[text shortened]... ng children in a playground. Get him Sonhouse!!!!! Then, what willl be your satisfaction????????
Stop posting drunk.


@kmax87 said
Well the current guy is doing his best to lose that lead. Being contrary and 'ornery towards your nation's greatest allies, while cosying up to Xi and calling him a great man. Oh the ingratiation.

Part of me feels its simply because Xi is a little bigger in stature. Very WWE.
Great post. While you have our undivided attention, maybe YOU can be the one to tell us who you would rather have as president of the United States of America, with its 342M residents including eh illegal aliens that we are responsible for.
So, who?


@shavixmir said
Stop posting drunk.
Nothing drunk about this question. Could you, as a respected member of the community, encourage this little feller to answer it?


@AverageJoe1 said
Nothing drunk about this question. Could you, as a respected member of the community, encourage this little feller to answer it?
Nope. It's rubbish.


@AverageJoe1 said
The news is all about VA having 2 courts ruled that racial gerrymandering is NOT constitutional. It is institutionalized racism. Dems say the system is broken because 'we do not like the outcome"?

Secondly, if you fellers get the House, your president (you will agree that the USA needs someone to make decisions on running the USA , so that we can play chess and wat ...[text shortened]... ng children in a playground. Get him Sonhouse!!!!! Then, what willl be your satisfaction????????
Democrat redistricting is not "racial gerrymandering". It is a fix to Republican redistricting, which IS racial gerrymandering, in violation of the Voting Rights Act.

How you fools continue to get this wrong is beyond me. Oh yeah, propaganda. Except you're not fooling anyone except racist voters, who are desperately looking for a way to justify racist voter suppression.



And, to answer your question just for the hell of it, not that you'll listen, the satisfaction will be a recognition that the system works, is not broken, and that grifting, corrupt politicians CAN be weeded out, even if they reside at the White House.

2 edits

@AverageJoe1 said
Great post. While you have our undivided attention, maybe YOU can be the one to tell us who you would rather have as president of the United States of America, with its 342M residents including eh illegal aliens that we are responsible for.
So, who?
Hakeem Jeffries, although we know he wouldn't leave his post at the House (who else would/could be Speaker?).


Plus, another black president would be a worthy "neener, neener" in your faces.

Of course, you lost your minds in 2024 because we put up a black woman.

1 edit

@Suzianne said
Hakeem Jeffries, although we know he wouldn't leave his post at the House (who else would/could be Speaker?).


Plus, another black president would be a worthy "neener, neener" in your faces.

Of course, you lost your minds in 2024 because we put up a black woman.
ummm...you havent had the first black president yet...and...the people did not put up a black woman (harris isnt black either)...the democrat party did that without the voters input.

2 edits

@AverageJoe1 said
The news is all about VA having 2 courts ruled that racial gerrymandering is NOT constitutional. It is institutionalized racism. Dems say the system is broken because 'we do not like the outcome"?

Secondly, if you fellers get the House, your president (you will agree that the USA needs someone to make decisions on running the USA , so that we can play chess and wat ...[text shortened]... ng children in a playground. Get him Sonhouse!!!!! Then, what willl be your satisfaction????????
I don't think there's a legitimate argument for using race in ANY legal or political context, except for identification purposes on birth certificates and driver's licenses. Ideally race would be a non-factor in everything.


@Suzianne said
Hakeem Jeffries, although we know he wouldn't leave his post at the House (who else would/could be Speaker?).


Plus, another black president would be a worthy "neener, neener" in your faces.

Of course, you lost your minds in 2024 because we put up a black woman.
How about Winsome Earle-Sears? I'd vote for her.