Go back
Is This

Is This "Professor" Insane?

Debates


Or just incredibly stupid?


@jj-adams said
Or just incredibly stupid?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntRuONq3E7M
Intelligent, sane and articulate.

1 edit

@jj-adams said
Or just incredibly stupid?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntRuONq3E7M
Gender and Gods… good grief… the things people believe in nowadays…

Anyhoo… if you can get pregnant, you are a biological woman, no matter what gender you think you are.

Does this mean that if you can’t get pregnant you are not a woman? No. There are many biological women who can’t get pregnant.

What you have to ask yourself is: why the hell do you care? It’s got nothing to do with you.
And while we’re at it: stop listening to professors, they’re way above your paygrade. Stick to grunting with farm animals.


@athousandyoung said
Intelligent, sane and articulate.
Josh Hawley, baiting.....He never laid a glove on her
She made him look foolish..........
His wife slso has a 'deficit in her understanding' and gets schooled.
https://www.salon.com/2022/07/14/ayanna-pressley-publicly-schools-josh-hawleys-wife-on-abortion-a-deficit-in-your-understanding/

1 edit

@shavixmir

Why do you care about american politics?
It's got nothing to do with you.

See how stupid you sound?

You keep doing this..."why do you care? It's got nothing to do with you"...lame ass response all the time. 🙄


@beowulf said
@shavixmir

Why do you care about american politics?
It's got nothing to do with you.

See how stupid you sound?

You keep doing this..."why do you care? It's got nothing to do with you"...lame ass response all the time. 🙄
What has it to do with you?


@JJ-Adams

She looks stupid as F.

See how her eyes got big when she realized she was going down the rabbit hole that she created 🤣

The music build up was funny too 😂


@jimm619

Missing the point once again Jimmy 🤔

1 edit

@jj-adams said
Or just incredibly stupid?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntRuONq3E7M
I suppose when you try to answer a question by a straight and narrow conservative, any answer will sound stupid.

I suppose I will scratch my head on this as well. But more so that a religious conservative is trying to enter the debate.

You guys are still trying to figure out why conservatives want to ban contraception, something that will reduce the abortion issue.


@mghrn55 said
I suppose when you try to answer a question by a straight and narrow conservative, any answer will sound stupid.

I suppose I will scratch my head on this as well. But more so that a religious conservative is trying to enter the debate.

You guys are still trying to figure out why conservatives want to ban contraception, something that will reduce the abortion issue.
Yeah, or the day after pill.


@mghrn55 said
I suppose when you try to answer a question by a straight and narrow conservative, any answer will sound stupid.

I suppose I will scratch my head on this as well. But more so that a religious conservative is trying to enter the debate.

You guys are still trying to figure out why conservatives want to ban contraception, something that will reduce the abortion issue.
They want to increase the birth rate among white Americans and instead of encouraging healthy incomes so people will feel comfortable raising kids properly they want to maximize pregnancies by State fiat.

2 edits

@athousandyoung said
They want to increase the birth rate among white Americans and instead of encouraging healthy incomes so people will feel comfortable raising kids properly they want to maximize pregnancies by State fiat.
Wrong.

Women of color have way more abortions.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/black-and-hispanic-people-have-the-most-to-lose-if-roe-is-overturned

https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-wont-the-left-talk-about-racial-disparities-in-abortion-low-income-marriage-pro-choice-11652218772


@beowulf said
Wrong.

Women of color have way more abortions.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/black-and-hispanic-people-have-the-most-to-lose-if-roe-is-overturned

https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-wont-the-left-talk-about-racial-disparities-in-abortion-low-income-marriage-pro-choice-11652218772
White nationalists are not known for dispassionately checking their conspiracies against facts.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/cpac-head-matt-schlapp-says-replacement-theory-is-solved-by-abortion-ban

Matt Schlapp, the head of the influential Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), has suggested the racist “great replacement theory” could be solved by banning abortion. The confidant of former President Donald Trump said that a “first step” in handling immigration issues was to overturn Roe v. Wade. “If you say there is a population problem in a country, but you’re killing millions of your own people every year through legalized abortion every year, if that were to be reduced, some of that problem is solved,” Schlapp said at the conference in Hungary, according to Vice News. “You have millions of people who can take many of these jobs. How come no one brings that up? If you’re worried about this quote-unquote replacement, why don’t we start there. Start with allowing our own people to live.”


@beowulf said
Wrong.

Women of color have way more abortions.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/black-and-hispanic-people-have-the-most-to-lose-if-roe-is-overturned

https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-wont-the-left-talk-about-racial-disparities-in-abortion-low-income-marriage-pro-choice-11652218772
Well, there goes Tucker's 'replacement theory.'