@shavixmir saidI wouldn't have sought NATO membership to avoid being invaded. Zelensky apparently wanted Ukraine to be invaded. He did nothing to prevent it and he could have. He is a puppet of the USA. Only a puppet would do everything they can to get Russia to invade.
How large is the Russian army compared to the Ukranian army?
Now, if you were fighting these odds… what would you be doing?
Here is the title to this newsweek article:
"Zelensky Reveals Why He Didn’t Warn His Citizens of Russian Invasion"
https://www.newsweek.com/zelensky-reveals-why-he-didnt-warn-his-citizens-russian-invasion-1734268
Zelensky can only warn of a Russian invasion if he knows Russia will invade. So by answering the question he is admitting he knew. Did he do anything to try to prevent it? Nope.
@sonhouse saidIt would depend on the scale used, and the actual thickness of the ink marking it on the slide rule. It's super hard to get accuracy out of an analog device.
You would have been blown away by that 50 foot slide rule🙂 Wonder what math you could use to get the best readings off such a slide rule and how theoretically it could be in terms of accuracy if you made a digital version of a slide rule one kilometer long, how many digits of accuracy could you get with that Slide rule?
@Metal-Brain said"Blame the Victim"
I wouldn't have sought NATO membership to avoid being invaded. Zelensky apparently wanted Ukraine to be invaded. He did nothing to prevent it and he could have. He is a puppet of the USA. Only a puppet would do everything they can to get Russia to invade.
Here is the title to this newsweek article:
"Zelensky Reveals Why He Didn’t Warn His Citizens of Russian Invasi ...[text shortened]... So by answering the question he is admitting he knew. Did he do anything to try to prevent it? Nope.
You've learned well from your Trumpublican friends.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidNo. I do not believe CO2 causes global warming in the atmosphere. I am simply pointing out that GW alarmists are not alarmed that war is increasing CO2 in the atmosphere so they are not really alarmed at all. They just repeat misinformation like parrots and contradict themselves later by condoning CO2 rise from war.
Your caveat, "I am not saying it is," renders your entire thread meaningless.
Global warming alarmists should not be supporting war. It is a contradiction.
@Metal-Brain saidWow, wrong end of the stick AGAIN.
Kuwait was slant drilling and stealing Iraq's oil. Putin prevented Ukraine from becoming a NATO member by invading so there was another reason. But your whataboutism is noted.
@Suzianne saidThe so called victim knew Russia was going to invade and did nothing to prevent it. He explained why he did not warn his people so he knew.
"Blame the Victim"
You've learned well from your Trumpublican friends.
https://www.newsweek.com/zelensky-reveals-why-he-didnt-warn-his-citizens-russian-invasion-1734268
And why is Ukraine targeting oil refineries? You don't believe all that man made GW BS. You are fine with more CO2 in the atmosphere.
@sonhouse saidNot refinery. Refineries. Do me a favor and count them. Ukraine is trying to choke off Russia's fuel supply by burning it in a waste of fuel. You know fully well that spews a lot of CO2 in the atmosphere. Either you don't believe you own alarmism rhetoric or you hate Russia more than you want to save the planet.
WHATABOUT? What planet do you come from again? You never saw the video's of the Kuwait oil wells ablaze for MONTHS spewing really BAD crap into the atmosphere, You really think that is somehow nothing compared to Ukraine hitting a refinery?
Can you tell me WHY Kuwait wells burned for MONTHS? I doubt you will answer that one even if you know.
Are you supporting destroying the earth to get Russia?
@Ponderable saidWhy? More CO2 in the atmosphere makes plants grow faster. That means more food for us. I am not concerned about rising CO2 levels, but the alarmists are and they are the same people who support funding a proxy war with Russia.
yes, all carbon burning should be avoided.
I strongly assume thatceasing the "special military operation" would save much more carbon dioxide emissions than pursuing them. How do you feel about that?
Why are the same people that say GW is destroying the planet supporting a war that is destroying the planet? Ukraine war supporters are supporting eco terrorism.
@Metal-Brain saidI'm fine with Russia NOT re-absorbing Ukraine.
The so called victim knew Russia was going to invade and did nothing to prevent it. He explained why he did not warn his people so he knew.
https://www.newsweek.com/zelensky-reveals-why-he-didnt-warn-his-citizens-russian-invasion-1734268
And why is Ukraine targeting oil refineries? You don't believe all that man made GW BS. You are fine with more CO2 in the atmosphere.
If Russia is hurting SO much, they can call off their aggression against another sovereign nation.
@Metal-Brain saidIn fact we do bring a lot of co2 more into the atmosphere than the plants can absorb. This is undisputed even among the most hard headed people. So adding co2 is not a measure to grow more food.
Why? More CO2 in the atmosphere makes plants grow faster. That means more food for us. I am not concerned about rising CO2 levels, but the alarmists are and they are the same people who support funding a proxy war with Russia.
Why are the same people that say GW is destroying the planet supporting a war that is destroying the planet? Ukraine war supporters are supporting eco terrorism.
And what you are making a falsi generalization...
@Metal-Brain saidYeah, payback is a BITCH.
Not refinery. Refineries. Do me a favor and count them. Ukraine is trying to choke off Russia's fuel supply by burning it in a waste of fuel. You know fully well that spews a lot of CO2 in the atmosphere. Either you don't believe you own alarmism rhetoric or you hate Russia more than you want to save the planet.
Are you supporting destroying the earth to get Russia?
@Nanomaster saidSo your propaganda says that attack was a HUNDRED TIMES worse than the Hussain attack on Kuwait oil fields, BURNING FOR MONTHS.
The scientists argue now that the Ukrainian war indeed has a grave impact on Earth's ecosystem.
Whether it remarkably contributes to global warming, I do not know.
Concerning Ukraine's behaviour towards nuclear power stations, I believe it is state-sponsored nuclear terrorism.
Concerning Ukraine's military and political intentions, I do not believe Ukraine is inte ...[text shortened]... with such a leadership.
However, Western countries should provide considerable humanitarian help.
So TELL ME HOW the Russian refinery attack is SO much worse than Kuwait.
Your attempt to rewrite history is pathetic.
@Suzianne saidFor accuracy it could be made with laser beam cuts into the material, and of course computer guided laser cuts so they are accurate to within one nanometer.
It would depend on the scale used, and the actual thickness of the ink marking it on the slide rule. It's super hard to get accuracy out of an analog device.
What I was pointing out is even a 50 foot slide rule would only have maybe 5 digits accuracy. And would be a BITCH to run🙂
@Ponderable saidExactly.
In fact we do bring a lot of co2 more into the atmosphere than the plants can absorb. This is undisputed even among the most hard headed people. So adding co2 is not a measure to grow more food.
And what you are making a falsi generalization...