@mott-the-hoople saidIt's not a video, ffs.
and if I keep reading it is the “federal judge” part gonna change? 😂
@mott-the-hoople saidMy mistake, i misunderstood.
LOL…
My point is Sluzane is accusing lying, claiming a “state” banned this.
The fact is a “federal judge” did this, nothing to do with a state or lying.
Im sure sluzy will be along any time to correct “their lie”
But just to make it clear: I was mistaken and you don't in fact think a judge should have the power to decide for the whole country?
@averagejoe1 said"So, do you consider terminating a pregnancy’ to be a natural thing to do?"
Do you and the Suzianne person consider yourselves natural? Good,so do I. So, do you consider terminating a pregnancy’ to be a natural thing to do?
I say that it is not natural. A yes or no is about the only answer here, or you can waste our time with segue.
The most natural thing. The woman has full sovereignty over her own boddy. She has the right to freedom. You hypocrites are trying to give rights over her body to another entity. Even if that entity would be a person (which it fukin isn't) it's still depriving one person of their freedom.
@zahlanzi saidWhat if she wants to torture and mutilate the fetus? Should that be as legal as your own body modification or getting whipped for pleasure or religious expression?
"So, do you consider terminating a pregnancy’ to be a natural thing to do?"
The most natural thing. The woman has full sovereignty over her own boddy. She has the right to freedom. You hypocrites are trying to give rights over her body to another entity. Even if that entity would be a person (which it fukin isn't) it's still depriving one person of their freedom.
@athousandyoung saidAnd why do people refer to the unborn fetus as a baby? When are you having the baby? Oh, I feel the baby kicking! You freedom seeking 😆 liberals .....When you are chatting with a pregnant woman do you ask about her fetus, or her baby? Riiiiiiggght.
What if she wants to torture and mutilate the fetus? Should that be as legal as your own body modification or getting whipped for pleasure or religious expression?
You are foolish searching children...
@zahlanzi saidLike getting drunk, partying, screwing anyone whenever. Meeting hookups online or out and about and who knows what else? Should these same men and women not take responsibility for the unborn child?
"So, do you consider terminating a pregnancy’ to be a natural thing to do?"
The most natural thing. The woman has full sovereignty over her own boddy. She has the right to freedom. You hypocrites are trying to give rights over her body to another entity. Even if that entity would be a person (which it fukin isn't) it's still depriving one person of their freedom.
@averagejoe1 saidThat's right: never let your bottomless ignorance about a subject stop you from flapping your lips anyway.
I will admit to not finding this an interesting subject after the fact, didnt read it, but I gotta say, what difference does it make since it was properly decided by SCOTUS. It's over, Suzianne, regardless the discussions.
Y'all will beat a dead horse.
Attention whore.
@averagejoe1 saidThe wealthy use their amassed money to influence politicians and public policy, which affects everyone.
If it is not, then how is it your business what the wealthy do with their money?
You see how confused you are. Send us a link that abortion is an absolute right, and I will confuse you on that one too.0
You really are bad at this critical thinking thing.
@zahlanzi saidYes, very weird.
It's so funny to me that a random judge in a random state can overrule the FDA and just ban something. Nation wide .
Amerika is weird
We really need a new constitution. A modern one. Very badly. I always recommend a parliamentary form of government when this issue comes up.
@mike69 saidThe liberals here, all of them, (as they have to adhere to mob-think), say kill the fetus, the baby. They view everything like this. Everything. And, Not to be off-issue, but how casual they are to to want some productive person to support them for god sakes. They have no substance about them, they are feeders.
Like getting drunk, partying, screwing anyone whenever. Meeting hookups online or out and about and who knows what else? Should these same men and women not take responsibility for the unborn child?
@soothfast saidIt was properly decided by SCOTUS. I say that, and you get angry with me. Libs get angry. It is a normal trait. Where am I ignorant. I just quote what happened. A court realized the problem is for the states. You are being ugly to me, and I am really upset about it. Yes, I could scream. And everyone read what your wrote.
That's right: never let your bottomless ignorance about a subject stop you from flapping your lips anyway.
Attention whore.
@soothfast saidSo, are you saying they shouldn't 'be able' to have such money to do their dastardly deeds? Then, dammit, close your post by saying how to stop such things. Wherefore goes the amassed money? Where does it come from, and where does it go?
The wealthy use their amassed money to influence politicians and public policy, which affects everyone.
You really are bad at this critical thinking thing.
1 edit
@soothfast saidTell us what you would change? Gun law? Free Speech not be free anymore ? Mob rule? Add more judges after about 150 years of 9! Why are you guys so antsy, you know that you will win in the end esp when you become brothers with illegal aliens. That must really feel good.
Yes, very weird.
We really need a new constitution. A modern one. Very badly. I always recommend a parliamentary form of government when this issue comes up.
It is OK with me, they will be working for my children. And no, my children will not give them a piece of the business. Oh unless the constitution makes them. Y'all are a mean lot.
@mike69 saidJesus never punished people for sinning.
Like getting drunk, partying, screwing anyone whenever. Meeting hookups online or out and about and who knows what else? Should these same men and women not take responsibility for the unborn child?
He thought they could be saved. Was he wrong, then?
Must you punish everyone for violating your own wack-a-doodle "sin list"?