@zahlanzi saidLOL…
oh so you would be ok with a federal judge in california listening to 2 witnesses the instituting a nation-wide ban on ar-15?
My point is Sluzane is accusing lying, claiming a “state” banned this.
The fact is a “federal judge” did this, nothing to do with a state or lying.
Im sure sluzy will be along any time to correct “their lie”
@AverageJoe1
Love the use of 'Properly'.
So now the zombie courts are giving medical opinions with zero to do with actual medicine, like banning even over the counter abortion pills.
This has EVERYTHING to do with partisan politics, ultrarightwingnut style.
@mott-the-hoople saidRead the article, Homer.
that is all that is needed to refute your lying claim…a state didnt do this.
But you will charge on ahead as if you have a point
@averagejoe1 saidFace to face, she'd slap you for trying.
Face to face, I feel that I could talk her out of it.
It's none of your damned business.
@averagejoe1 saidDid the Dred Scott decision prevent the Civil War?
I will admit to not finding this an interesting subject after the fact, didnt read it, but I gotta say, what difference does it make since it was properly decided by SCOTUS. It's over, Suzianne, regardless the discussions.
Y'all will beat a dead horse.
Another proper SCOTUS decision, according to you, I'm sure.
@averagejoe1 saidThe "whataboutism" argument falls flat on its face here.
If it is not, then how is it your business what the wealthy do with their money?
You see how confused you are. Send us a link that abortion is an absolute right, and I will confuse you on that one too.0
@averagejoe1 saidthey know they dont stand a chance when you compare sides
How so? You make a sub-issue about people minding their own business, and I just tell a similar one. I don't see your point. However, I think everyone sees mine.
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidI know it must be disconcerting to lose a point, but hey, she can make another!
they know they dont stand a chance when you compare sides
(do you think that she will tell me to mind my own post, that hers is none of my business?)
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidRead the article, Homer.
they know they dont stand a chance when you compare sides
@kevcvs57 saidDo you and the Suzianne person consider yourselves natural? Good,so do I. So, do you consider terminating a pregnancy’ to be a natural thing to do?
Hey idiot child, family planning has, and should have nothing to do with the state, it’s what people do when they decide how many kids they want or can support. Stop the dodging, a republican trump appointed judge in Texas is trying to control the lives and choices of every woman in the US based on his evangelical god delusion, it’s no different to the Taliban or any other fundamentalist religious sect. The bad news is they are republican law makers
I say that it is not natural. A yes or no is about the only answer here, or you can waste our time with segue.