Go back
Jimmy Dore to replace Tucker Carlson

Jimmy Dore to replace Tucker Carlson

Debates


@zahlanzi said
Have you considered seeing a psychologist to help with this pathological need to believe in conspiracy theories? Or maybe it's gotten to the point where you need a psychiatrist and hard meds. Maybe a nice room at a nice facility somewhere.
Have you considered seeing a psychologist to help with this pathological need to believe explanations that do not make sense?

You are not fooling anyone. If you were even remotely capable of proving me wrong you would not have to resort to pathetic ad hominem attacks. Your ad hominem attacks are a symptom of desperation and weakness.

If you want to impress anyone you will prove me wrong. Ad hominem attacks are to avoid admitting you cannot. Your failure is noted.


@wajoma said
Maybe that's one of the oldest most tedious put downs on the internet, maybe you need some new material.
Still a perfectly valid observation if all the evidence points to it being true though. Do you think pretending otherwise is doing MB a service?


@metal-brain said
Have you considered seeing a psychologist to help with this pathological need to believe explanations that do not make sense?

You are not fooling anyone. If you were even remotely capable of proving me wrong you would not have to resort to pathetic ad hominem attacks. Your ad hominem attacks are a symptom of desperation and weakness.

If you want to impress anyone you will prove me wrong. Ad hominem attacks are to avoid admitting you cannot. Your failure is noted.
"If you were even remotely capable of proving me wrong you would not have to resort to pathetic ad hominem attacks. Your ad hominem attacks are a symptom of desperation and weakness. "
You don't understand the difference between ad hominems and simply noticing things.
At this point very few people are debating with you. Maybe those that believe you are a troll. I am starting to think that you really do have a problem.


@metal-brain said
Prove it. What did Tucker lie about?
Ask his lawyers. They will tell you all about it.

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye


@metal-brain said
Prove it. What did Tucker lie about?
Haha. Remember how I browbeat these pillow-chewers to tell us one lie and they could not.


@kevcvs57 said
Still a perfectly valid observation if all the evidence points to it being true though. Do you think pretending otherwise is doing MB a service?
“IF”…πŸ˜‚


@zahlanzi said
"If you were even remotely capable of proving me wrong you would not have to resort to pathetic ad hominem attacks. Your ad hominem attacks are a symptom of desperation and weakness. "
You don't understand the difference between ad hominems and simply noticing things.
At this point very few people are debating with you. Maybe those that believe you are a troll. I am starting to think that you really do have a problem.
What did you notice? Is it a secret?


@kevcvs57 said
Still a perfectly valid observation if all the evidence points to it being true though. Do you think pretending otherwise is doing MB a service?
What is true?


@zahlanzi said
"If you were even remotely capable of proving me wrong you would not have to resort to pathetic ad hominem attacks. Your ad hominem attacks are a symptom of desperation and weakness. "
You don't understand the difference between ad hominems and simply noticing things.
At this point very few people are debating with you. Maybe those that believe you are a troll. I am starting to think that you really do have a problem.
you crazy man zahlooney bamboozle, you off your meds?

Just noticing things.

1 edit

@metal-brain said
What is true?
That you are a certifiable nutter, of course.

I believe you do have a problem. I've pointed it out before.


@soothfast said
That you are a certifiable nutter, of course.

I believe you do have a problem. I've pointed it out before.
I am always a nutter to those that lost the debate badly.
Better luck next time. πŸ™‚


@metal-brain said
I am always a nutter to those that lost the debate badly.
Better luck next time. πŸ™‚
That's not really how sane people judge whether they've prevailed in a debate.

I mean, if so many believe you to be pathologically delusional, this response of yours hardly helps refute the charge.

1 edit

@soothfast said
That's not really how sane people judge whether they've prevailed in a debate.

I mean, if so many believe you to be pathologically delusional, this response of yours hardly helps refute the charge.
I thought, you don't need to add the smiley emoji MB, everyone is going to see your post was a joke, maybe they wouldn't laugh but they'd see the joke.

But noooooo, not the terminal bore known as soothfast. Even with the smiley emoji saying 'joke here, joke here' captain slow thinks he's making some kind of point, he doesn't realise the point is he's a dimwit.


@soothfast said
That's not really how sane people judge whether they've prevailed in a debate.

I mean, if so many believe you to be pathologically delusional, this response of yours hardly helps refute the charge.
You are not sane. You think it doesn't matter if you can give one single lie as an example. You operate based on rumors. You never confirm anything you accept without scrutiny. You are anti debate. Why are you even on this forum. You hate debates. You just want to hear a confirmation bias. You are not interested in differing opinions. That would ruin your group think.


@zahlanzi said
Have you considered seeing a psychologist to help with this pathological need to believe in conspiracy theories? Or maybe it's gotten to the point where you need a psychiatrist and hard meds. Maybe a nice room at a nice facility somewhere.
He doesn’t believe what he posts. He’s a troll whose purpose here is to sow disinformation and discord.