1. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    29 Jun '16 14:201 edit
    Originally posted by DeepThought
    Yes. Your constitution is outdated as far as gun ownership is concerned. You no longer require a militia for defence and so that amendment is largely irrelevant and dangerous to you.
    I understand now that when you guys talk about the Constitution being outdated, it is simply code for attacking gun ownership.

    But just remember, what sparked the Revolutionary war was the fact that the British came for their ammo.
  2. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    816
    29 Jun '16 14:33
    Originally posted by whodey
    I understand now that when you guys talk about the Constitution being outdated, it is simply code for attacking gun ownership.

    But just remember, what sparked the Revolutionary war was the fact that the British came for their ammo.
    Deepthroat doesn't have two braincells to rub together whodey. He goes along with whatever programing the state gives him and critical thinking for him is nonexistant. People like that would rather side with Mao, Stalin, and Hitler rather than the founding fathers of this nation. Don't concern yourself too much with these mouthpieces of tyranny. Just forgive them for they are ignorant of anything outside the communist manifesto.
  3. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    29 Jun '16 17:28
    Originally posted by whodey
    Who should decide then, SCOTUS?
    IMO. But there have been heated debates about the provision; it is far from clear (probably intentionally so).
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree