13 Dec 21
Assange exposed Debbie Wasserman Schultz's efforts to meddle in the democrat primary election to steal the primary election from Bernie Sanders and give it to Hitlery Clinton.
Thank you Jullian Assange. You are a hero. You exposed corruption in the DNC and forced DWS to resign in disgrace. You have done all Americans a great service, especially democrats. It was their DNC that was improved because of it.
13 Dec 21
Trump wanted Assange executed. Think about that.
Trump wanted to kill Assange for exposing election meddling in the DNC.
I thought democrats opposed everything Trump stood for. You agree with him on this???????
Apparently Trump wanted to kill Assange for helping the DNC root out a corrupt election meddler. Rooting out a corrupt election meddler is a good thing, a service to democrats who care about democracy.
https://rumble.com/vqmjt8-msnbcs-non-stop-lying-about-julian-assange.html
@metal-brain saidWrong:
Apparently Trump wanted to kill Assange for helping the DNC root out a corrupt election meddler.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/sep/18/trump-offered-julian-assange-pardon-in-return-for-democrat-hacking-source-court-told
WikiLeaks published a series of DNC emails damaging to the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton, that US intelligence believes were hacked by Russia as part of its effort to influence the election
Trump doesn't care about "corruption". He's trying to stop (even more) evidence being released that he colluded with Russia to win the election.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147483
13 Dec 21
@vivify saidLOL you didnt learn anything from mueller did you?
Wrong:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/sep/18/trump-offered-julian-assange-pardon-in-return-for-democrat-hacking-source-court-told
WikiLeaks published a series of DNC emails damaging to the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton, that US intelligence believes were hacked by Russia as part of its effort to influence the election
Trump doesn't ...[text shortened]... trying to stop (even more) evidence being released that he colluded with Russia to win the election.
@mott-the-hoople saidhttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49100778
LOL you didnt learn anything from mueller did you?
"Trump was not exonerated by my report, Robert Mueller tells Congress".
@vivify said"WikiLeaks published a series of DNC emails damaging to the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton"
Wrong:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/sep/18/trump-offered-julian-assange-pardon-in-return-for-democrat-hacking-source-court-told
WikiLeaks published a series of DNC emails damaging to the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton, that US intelligence believes were hacked by Russia as part of its effort to influence the election
Trump doesn't ...[text shortened]... trying to stop (even more) evidence being released that he colluded with Russia to win the election.
WRONG!
That didn't damage HRC unless exposing election meddling intended to help her win the nomination in a corrupt way is damaging. What damaged HRC was HRC hiring DWS to work on her campaign after DWS resigned in disgrace from the DNC. Before that it was all on DWS, but hiring her made it clear HRC approved of DWS' election meddling.
Hitlery Clinton exposed herself for approving of election meddling in the DNC. She damaged herself. Nobody else.
edit: Assange said Russia was not the source of the emails he released and Crowdstrike admitted under oath they didn't really have evidence. In other words, they lied.
13 Dec 21
@vivify saidIn other words, he had no evidence of collusion. Still doesn't.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49100778
"Trump was not exonerated by my report, Robert Mueller tells Congress".
It is Mueller's way of defending that huge waste of money he benefited from.
When people don't have evidence they often say "but there is no evidence he didn't".
Nothing. It is another way of saying he found nothing.
@metal-brain saidWrong again:
In other words, he had no evidence of collusion
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/18/mueller-report-says-trump-campaign-eager-benefit-russias-interference-collusion-investigation/3379332002/
WASHINGTON — The Russian government undertook a "sweeping and systematic" campaign to help Donald Trump win the White House in 2016, believing it would benefit from his presidency, and found campaign aides eager to benefit from their help, special counsel Robert Mueller concluded in a report released Thursday.
"The investigation established multiple links between Trump campaign officials and individuals tied to the Russian government," the more than 400-page report says.
In perhaps the best-known example, Trump aides including his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., met with a Russian lawyer who had promised damaging information about Trump's Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton. Trump Jr. enthusiastically accepted the meeting, after he was told the session was the idea of the "crown prosecutor of Russia," the report says.
13 Dec 21
@vivify saidHypocrisy alert!
Wrong again:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/18/mueller-report-says-trump-campaign-eager-benefit-russias-interference-collusion-investigation/3379332002/
WASHINGTON — The Russian government undertook a "sweeping and systematic" campaign to help Donald Trump win the White House in 2016, believing it would benefit from his presidency, and found ...[text shortened]... r he was told the session was the idea of the "crown prosecutor of Russia," the report says.
https://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/
The Russian lawyer with alleged ties to the Russian government worked for the DNC. Every single thing you think is proof of Russian collusion with Trump applies to Hitlery Clinton.
There is no law against talking with Russians. If there was the FBI would be guilty of that since they colluded with Dmitri Alperovitch, co founder of Crowdstrike. He was born in Russia.
Do you see how silly your criteria is now?
You were fed a false narrative and you swallowed it. HRC is guilty of just as much of it if not more.
13 Dec 21
@metal-brain saidYou really draw the wrong conclusion on every single topic, don’t you?
In other words, he had no evidence of collusion. Still doesn't.
It is Mueller's way of defending that huge waste of money he benefited from.
When people don't have evidence they often say "but there is no evidence he didn't".
Nothing. It is another way of saying he found nothing.
Bloody amazing.
Let’s test it:
A man crosses the road and gets run down by a drunk driver (who’s driving the car, just to be clear).
What’s the logical conclusion?
@shavixmir saidThe man didn't die from covid.
You really draw the wrong conclusion on every single topic, don’t you?
Bloody amazing.
Let’s test it:
A man crosses the road and gets run down by a drunk driver (who’s driving the car, just to be clear).
What’s the logical conclusion?
That would not stop people from testing him for covid and calling it a covid death if the test was positive though. That is what you condone, right?
13 Dec 21
@metal-brain saidSee. You draw conclusions based on nothing.
The man didn't die from covid.
That would not stop people from testing him for covid and calling it a covid death if the test was positive though. That is what you condone, right?
@shavixmir saidSo you do not accept the official covid death numbers then?
See. You draw conclusions based on nothing.
That is how they count covid deaths.
13 Dec 21
@metal-brain saidYou've probably started a hundred threads on this topic and still have learned nothing.
Assange exposed Debbie Wasserman Schultz's efforts to meddle in the democrat primary election to steal the primary election from Bernie Sanders and give it to Hitlery Clinton.
Thank you Jullian Assange. You are a hero. You exposed corruption in the DNC and forced DWS to resign in disgrace. You have done all Americans a great service, especially democrats. It was their DNC that was improved because of it.
Everybody on Planet Earth who paid any attention to the 2016 Democratic primaries knew that the DNC Establishment favored HRC; in fact, it was a major message of the Sanders campaign. Assange, by publishing emails stolen by the Russian military, revealed absolutely nothing that anyone with half a brain didn't realize. And the idea that members of a partisan organization can "meddle" in an election is hilariously ridiculous.
@metal-brain saidYour article doesn't mention the lawyer or the DNC. Do you even read the articles you post? Or do you post links praying no one will read them and just take your word for what you claim it proves?
Hypocrisy alert!
https://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/
The Russian lawyer with alleged ties to the Russian government worked for the DNC.
Have integrity when you post.