Go back
Just too good...

Just too good...

Debates


Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
LOL...idiot doesn't understand the significance of taking an oath. Trying to downplay because Clinton wasn't put under oath
Not being under oath when questioned did not prevent Flynn from being prosecuted when he lied to the FBI.

You calling anyone an "idiot" is comical.


Originally posted by @no1marauder
Not being under oath when questioned did not prevent Flynn from being prosecuted when he lied to the FBI.

You calling anyone an "idiot" is comical.
You do not understand our laws. There is a difference in>making false statements< vs >lying under oath<.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/recycled/2007/03/how_many_ways_can_you_say_lie.html

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
You do not understand our laws. There is a difference in>making false statements< vs >lying under oath<.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/recycled/2007/03/how_many_ways_can_you_say_lie.html
It makes no real difference; false statements under 18 USC sec. 1001 or lying under oath (perjury) under 18 USC sec. 1621 have the same penalty; a fine or up to 5 years in prison or both.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
Trump is making a mockery of Meuller...LMFAO

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-apos-open-speaking-232401415.html
Trump is making a mockery out of the office of President...


But I'm not laughing.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
Trump is making a mockery of Meuller...LMFAO

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-apos-open-speaking-232401415.html
Trump and the GOP, the loud and proud party of law and order who showed up at every law enforcement event for the last 30 years, suddenly does a 180 when these same law enforcement folks start investigating "The Donald"

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @suzianne
It should be under oath or nothing.

We've been lied to enough already.
What makes you think he cares about oaths? Ask his former business associates how much he cares about honesty.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @shallow-blue
What makes you think he cares about oaths? Ask his former business associates how much he cares about honesty.
Well, you can just watch any random video of him speaking and you know what he thinks about truth and facts.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @suzianne
It should be under oath or nothing.

We've been lied to enough already.
They did not put Hillary under oath so why should they with Trump?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @no1marauder
It makes no real difference; false statements under 18 USC sec. 1001 or lying under oath (perjury) under 18 USC sec. 1621 have the same penalty; a fine or up to 5 years in prison or both.
Yes but only if these codes apply, AND the burden of proof differs, thus the difference in charges applied.