"On my first day I will take on price gouging and bring down costs"
"We will ban surprise late charges and fees that banks and lender use"
"We will take on landlords and cap unfair rent increases'
"We will take on big pharma and cap drug costs'
To do all this, you would have to have a socialist society, which congress will never pass. WH can't do that. You can't tell a landlord what they can charge. You simply cannot. She is putting that out there because she knows that her supporters do not know these are empty promises. She wants a socialist government. Where she can dictate how the economy is run , what you eat, what car you drive, how much money you can have (she got that from Bernie and Warren)......that is Socialism. She wants to tell us that we cannot have our own private health insurance. We have to be all in one government program. Maybe that was yesterday, she could have changed that position over night.
70 to 80% tax rates, ? That is communism. Soros, her supporter, is a socialist, and she wants that power that Sonhouse likes top talk about.
No need for a link, those are her words 2 nights ago. She is a socialist, and that is why Marauder wants her to be in charge. My wife wants Marauder to tell us what happens to the millions of houses in this country after Kamal tells us we can not own houses.
@AverageJoe1 saidAs if you have a wife!
"On my first day I will take on price gouging and bring down costs"
"We will ban surprise late charges and fees that banks and lender use"
"We will take on landlords and cap unfair rent increases'
"We will take on big pharma and cap drug costs'
To do all this, you would have to have a socialist society, which congress will never pass. WH can't do that. You can' ...[text shortened]... s what happens to the millions of houses in this country after Kamal tells us we can not own houses.
Hahaha
@shavixmir saidIt's my houses I worry about!!!!!
As if you have a wife!
Hahaha
You should have a talk with one of your continent mates, Zahlanzi. Really upset, at least you exhibit a bit of humor.
@AverageJoe1 saidWell, you tell us.
@AverageJoe1
What happens to the millions of houses if individuals cannot own them?
I mean within US capitalist society, when someone loses their job, or one of the family gets chronically ill… whole families get booted out of their houses as the bank takes back what it’s owned.
What does happen to these hundreds of thousands of houses?
@AverageJoe1 saidWho said that?
@AverageJoe1
What happens to the millions of houses if individuals cannot own them?
Let's see the quote.
Stop making sh-- up.
@shavixmir saidI have the answer for you, to that, but it is amazing how you libs will ignore a simple one-line question and submit another question. If we become socialist tomorrow, what would happen to all the homes owned by individuals?
Well, you tell us.
I mean within US capitalist society, when someone loses their job, or one of the family gets chronically ill… whole families get booted out of their houses as the bank takes back what it’s owned.
What does happen to these hundreds of thousands of houses?
Please man, don't be a Sonhouse.
@Suzianne saidMarauder said that. That, there would be no private ownership of housing. I was amazed too. And check out Shav, who, after being asked the question, responded, to me, "You tell us". I don't know, or I would have told you.
Who said that?
Let's see the quote.
Stop making sh-- up.
I dont know what thread the quote is in. I will cancel my golf and search for it.
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, I didn't.
Marauder said that. That, there would be no private ownership of housing. I was amazed too. And check out Shav, who, after being asked the question, responded, to me, "You tell us". I don't know, or I would have told you.
I dont know what thread the quote is in. I will cancel my golf and search for it.
The difference between "private property" and "personal property" has been explained to you dunderheads many times on this Forum. A home owned by someone for use as a residence is "personal property" and would be allowed under any form of socialism. A home owned by someone to rent to others would be "private property" and would not be allowed under most forms of socialism. Your stupid conflating of the two is typical of the uneducated.
Of course, none of this has anything to do with Kamala Harris who isn't a socialist.
@no1marauder saidI'm not going to look up where you said it, you said it.
No, I didn't.
The difference between "private property" and "personal property" has been explained to you dunderheads many times on this Forum. A home owned by someone for use as a residence is "personal property" and would be allowed under any form of socialism. A home owned by someone to rent to others would be "private property" and would not be allowed under most f ...[text shortened]... uneducated.
Of course, none of this has anything to do with Kamala Harris who isn't a socialist.
But take what you say here. A bit authoritarian, wouldn't you say. I am waked up one morning and told by Kamala Harris Pres that I can NOT OWN MY RENTAL PROPERTIES. Please confirm that that would indeed happen under socialism, and then we can have a grand ole discussion. No need to drag up Property Law 101.
Suzianne, you can lurk, this will pretty good. And, even YOU should find the word 'allowed' written by Marauder to be a bit creepy, to put it mildly.
@AverageJoe1 saidWho said that individuals cannot own a home?
I have the answer for you, to that, but it is amazing how you libs will ignore a simple one-line question and submit another question. If we become socialist tomorrow, what would happen to all the homes owned by individuals?
Please man, don't be a Sonhouse.
Who said it?
Answer: no one. You're making sh-- up again.
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, saying a human being can only live somewhere IF he pays money to another human being is "authoritarian".
I'm not going to look up where you said it, you said it.
But take what you say here. A bit authoritarian, wouldn't you say. I am waked up one morning and told by Kamala Harris Pres that I can NOT OWN MY RENTAL PROPERTIES. Please confirm that that would indeed happen under socialism, and then we can have a grand ole discussion. No need to drag up Property Law 1 ...[text shortened]... d, even YOU should find the word 'allowed' written by Marauder to be a bit creepy, to put it mildly.
But again, it has nothing to do with Kamala Harris.
@AverageJoe1 saidBullsh--!
I'm not going to look up where you said it, you said it.
But take what you say here. A bit authoritarian, wouldn't you say. I am waked up one morning and told by Kamala Harris Pres that I can NOT OWN MY RENTAL PROPERTIES. Please confirm that that would indeed happen under socialism, and then we can have a grand ole discussion. No need to drag up Property Law 1 ...[text shortened]... d, even YOU should find the word 'allowed' written by Marauder to be a bit creepy, to put it mildly.
You are just lying.
No one said that!