So it is close to crunch time for the hush money trial but I have a question,
there are indications, not particularly strong for sure, but signs maybe a trumpite ringer got on the jury.
Now suppose that is true and the ringer defies all logic and reason from the foreman and the rest of the jury who might say, he is frigging guilty because of X,Y, and Z and said ringer goes screw you all, my mind is made up, innocent.
So what follows of course is a hung jury.
The question is, suppose later, the same day, or later still, that person is found to have revealed him or herself as a trumpie and knew he was guilty but voted innocent anyway.
Is there any legal recourse to that result?
Could the jurist be charged with anything considering in that hypothetical case he or she knew the right vote to make but changed to innocent strictly based on political leanings?
@eYe
I hate the ACTIONS of Trump, like him and Rudy attacking the Freeman family in public on TV resulting in a hundred million+ settlement against Rudy where Trump's henchmen stalked and bullhorned into their home for MONTHS.
To me actions like this are not the signs of a real leader.
A real leader who has the power of POTUS, supposedly the most powerful man on Earth, should NEVER use the power of his post to attack individuals like voter fraud as if that was a crime, even if true, a crime they touted as worse than someone stealing nuclear secrets. This is clearly an abuse of power that should NEVER be tolerated in a democracy and that is only ONE of many such incidents that historians have now pronounced him the worse POTUS in American history, worse than Harding and that is saying something.
@eYe saidI know enough not to listen to them. Thy aren't paid to be right.
Yes I'm sure you know better than them.
How these lawyers will cover the verdict:
1) found guilty - 1 day story, lawyers go home, bring in the doctors to talk about Bidens memory loss.
2) hung jury or acquittal - months more coverage and air time for the lawyers, Trump's been exonerated, other trials should not even happen.
It's unreal how many media people get rich propping up Donald.
The post that was quoted here has been removedtrump’s defence begged for “no physical description of trump’s cock and balls” during the court case. Whilst at the same time claiming that trump never slept with Stormy Daniels…
Cohen paid 130.000 hush money… it’s in the books.. and trump’s defence says it was his own doing. Has anyone ever met such a lawyer?
The whole defence was a scam. A scam based on the premise that trump never had sex with Daniels. And that Cohen is a liar.
However, everyone knows trump shagged the porn star. And there’s proof of the hush money payment.
So the defence is rubbish at best.
How te jury sees it? God only knows.
Oh, and because of earlier comments (years ago) by, I believe, Stormy, we all know that trump has a small, mushroom shaped cock.
Small, like his damaged ego.
He’s a pathetic excuse for a man. Can’t even own up to his own mistakes.
Ugh.