Go back
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. bankrupt

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. bankrupt

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

The 4th largest US securities firm doesn't get a bail-out from Bush & Co.

Is the US Government running out of cash?

(btw it's not a recession)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Perhaps they ran-out of cash after Merrill Lynch was being bought by Bank of America for about $50 billion?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
The 4th largest US securities firm doesn't get a bail-out from Bush & Co.

Is the US Government running out of cash?

(btw it's not a recession)
Bailing out Lehmans?

Every bloody company in trouble would run to the Governement for a handout.

Let nature take its course.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
The 4th largest US securities firm doesn't get a bail-out from Bush & Co.

Is the US Government running out of cash?

(btw it's not a recession)
If US companies keep asking for taxpayer money like this you guys should just take every industry over.




"Meanwhile, American International Group Inc., the largest insurance company in the world, is asking the U.S. Federal Reserve for emergency funding as it works on a restructuring"

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by knightwest
Bailing out Lehmans?

Every bloody company in trouble would run to the Governement for a handout.

Let nature take its course.
But not in the case of Merrill Lynch bailed-out to the tune of $50 billion?

Also, what are your views then with regard to the trillions in financial guarantees given to Fannie May & Freddie Mac by expanding their access to credit and permitting the Treasury to buy shares in the companies if needed?

How the Free-Marketeers must change their tune once the wheels start to fall-off!

By rights, yes these companies should be allowed to fail in the laissez-faire of competition.

Only trouble is, in this case it would mean financial meltdown on a scale that would dwarf even the Great Depression if the Government did not intervene.

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
But not in the case of Merrill Lynch bailed-out to the tune of $50 billion?

Also, what are your views then with regard to the trillions in financial guarantees given to Fannie May & Freddie Mac by expanding their access to credit and permitting the Treasury to buy shares in the companies if needed?

How the Free-Marketeers must change their tune on ...[text shortened]... tdown on a scale that would dwarf even the Great Depression if the Government did not intervene.
Um, Merrill Lynch is being bought out by Bank of America, to be paid for with BOA stock. It's not a government bailout, nor is it a corporate bailout. I'm sure BOA has every intention of this purchase working out profitably.

Fannie and Freddie are quasi-governmental agencies. While I think these two agencies were horribly mismanaged and the government and agency corporate heads should have never allowed themselves to get in such a horrible position, keep in mind that Warren Buffett has stated that the Fannie/Freddie situation was handled in the best way possible, given the present conditions.

Oh, and BTW, Lehman stock is down to 21 cents per share at the moment. What a deal, what a deal! 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
But not in the case of Merrill Lynch bailed-out to the tune of $50 billion?

.
Merrrill was bought buy a private company called Bank of America (not the US Central Bank)

There was no bailout here...at least no details about gov't financing have been provided, yet.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
Merrrill was bought buy a private company called Bank of America (not the US Central Bank)

There was no bailout here...at least no details about gov't financing have been provided, yet.
Hooray!! Now what about AIG? You know, there is no end to this stuff.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
The 4th largest US securities firm doesn't get a bail-out from Bush & Co.

Is the US Government running out of cash?

(btw it's not a recession)
Why is it the responsibility of the government to bail out a private company?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
Hooray!! Now what about AIG? You know, there is no end to this stuff.
Eventually, there will be an end to the credit unwinding (sub-prime mortgages, derivatives, etc.), but, yeah, it's painful while it's happening. I have a fund that owns a little AIG (a very small position), unless it's been sold recently and not yet reported in the quarterly reports. I wouldn't want AIG to be bailed out either. If they go under and I lose a little money, hey, that's the breaks.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Why is it the responsibility of the government to bail out a private company?
It's not.

The point here is that Lehmans tried to get bailed out. Just like Bear Stearns...and now AIG.

I love how your big corporations say "Get the government out of our lives, give us less regualtion!" and then the moment things go bad because of their own stupidity, they come running back to the taxpayer hat in hand.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
It's not.

The point here is that Lehmans tried to get bailed out. Just like Bear Stearns...and now AIG.

I love how your big corporations say "Get the government out of our lives, give us less regualtion!" and then the moment things go bad because of their own stupidity, they come running back to the taxpayer hat in hand.
Maybe there is a need for less government intervention.

At least, that's how some will try to spin it, I'm sure.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by knightwest
Bailing out Lehmans?

Every bloody company in trouble would run to the Governement for a handout.

Let nature take its course.
I agreed (for once), bailing out all companies would not be good and devalue the dollar more so ......nature is the best course.....but how many more bumps on the road

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mad Rook
Eventually, there will be an end to the credit unwinding (sub-prime mortgages, derivatives, etc.), but, yeah, it's painful while it's happening. I have a fund that owns a little AIG (a very small position), unless it's been sold recently and not yet reported in the quarterly reports. I wouldn't want AIG to be bailed out either. If they go under and I lose a little money, hey, that's the breaks.
What fund do you have ? Type ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Why is it the responsibility of the government to bail out a private company?
$85 billion for AIG says it is the Federal Reserve's job...