Originally posted by @whodey In this wonderful new world of Progressive secularism [...]
The United States was founded as a secular republic. You have described yourself as a secularist on these forums. The Progressive movement dates back to 100 years ago. What is this "new" you refer to?
Originally posted by @whodey She is an adult. Are we now to deny marriage on the speculation of such things?
What about their rights?
Shouldn't some secular Progressive psychologist assess if they are both of "sound" mind?
If they were smart enough, which neither appear to be, they should sue and take it to SCOTUS where it belongs.
We should celebrate the Progressive right ...[text shortened]... ssivism is all about, breaking down silly barriers and traditions and silly notions of morality.
Originally posted by @shavixmir Of course I do.
It can never be a relationship based on equality. There will always be a parental-child relationship in there somewhere.
Originally posted by @sh76 For years, whenever same sex marriage comes up, whodey's thing is to demand that bigamy be legalized first and then we can discuss same sex marriages.
He is seemingly now extending that modus operandi to incest.
So you are willing to give one group their rights but ignore another groups rights?
Originally posted by @suzianne You, sir, are a complete and total jackass.
Why? Because I want to know why we give a damn as to the opinions of law makers as to who should be getting married and who should not so long as they are consenting adults?
Do you think that polygamy and incest is "yucky" or a "sin"?
Originally posted by @whodey Why? Because I want to know why we give a damn as to the opinions of law makers as to who should be getting married and who should not so long as they are consenting adults?
Do you think that polygamy and incest is "yucky" or a "sin"?