11 Jan '10 19:37>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8451109.stm
A package of reforms put forward by the Brazilian government to improve human rights is causing growing controversy.
"A proposed truth commission to investigate torture during military rule is said to have so angered forces chiefs that they threatened to resign.
Parts of the Catholic Church have opposed moves thought sympathetic to abortion and gay civil unions."
"The National Human Rights Plan first provoked a row when it was revealed that it proposed setting up a truth commission to investigate torture and killings carried out during the 21 years the military was in control, from 1964 to 1985.
In the period before democracy was restored an amnesty law was passed, in effect granting immunity to state officials involved in torture as well as those in the opposition who had resorted to violence.
Military chiefs believe the truth commission is an attempt to get round the amnesty law, while supporters argue it is simply designed to secure justice for the families of those who died and disappeared."
"Brazil's former President, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, told the BBC the government had not presented the proposal well.
"The way the situation has been presented was in the sense that all the crimes that had been exercised by those in power in the past would be judged, not the crimes that also the other side eventually could have responsibility for," he said.
"So this gave a sense of one-sidedness, and this produced unrest in the armed forces."
With sections of the Catholic Church, the media and his own agriculture minister antagonised by other aspects of the human rights plan, the president will have a challenge to find a solution that is acceptable to all sides.
........
any thoughts?
A package of reforms put forward by the Brazilian government to improve human rights is causing growing controversy.
"A proposed truth commission to investigate torture during military rule is said to have so angered forces chiefs that they threatened to resign.
Parts of the Catholic Church have opposed moves thought sympathetic to abortion and gay civil unions."
"The National Human Rights Plan first provoked a row when it was revealed that it proposed setting up a truth commission to investigate torture and killings carried out during the 21 years the military was in control, from 1964 to 1985.
In the period before democracy was restored an amnesty law was passed, in effect granting immunity to state officials involved in torture as well as those in the opposition who had resorted to violence.
Military chiefs believe the truth commission is an attempt to get round the amnesty law, while supporters argue it is simply designed to secure justice for the families of those who died and disappeared."
"Brazil's former President, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, told the BBC the government had not presented the proposal well.
"The way the situation has been presented was in the sense that all the crimes that had been exercised by those in power in the past would be judged, not the crimes that also the other side eventually could have responsibility for," he said.
"So this gave a sense of one-sidedness, and this produced unrest in the armed forces."
With sections of the Catholic Church, the media and his own agriculture minister antagonised by other aspects of the human rights plan, the president will have a challenge to find a solution that is acceptable to all sides.
........
any thoughts?