Originally posted by whodeyYou realize why this is a dumb post, right? She leads in the polls against Donald F*KNG Trump. It's like rubella being more popular than testicular cancer.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/16/poll-majority-think-hillary-did-something-wrong-with-private-email-account/
Most think Hillary did something wrong, but she still leads in the polls.
Why should she even bother to campaign?
11 Jul 16
Originally posted by whodeyIt's still highly likely to hurt her in November. About 6 in 10 independents say that she should have been indicted even though, oddly, only 33% say the whole issue makes it less likely for them to support her.http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/majority-disapproves-decision-charge-clinton-emails-poll/story?id=40445344
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/16/poll-majority-think-hillary-did-something-wrong-with-private-email-account/
Most think Hillary did something wrong, but she still leads in the polls.
Why should she even bother to campaign?
Originally posted by no1marauderIn other words, they would rather have an incompetent liar who broke the law rather than Trump.
It's still highly likely to hurt her in November. About 6 in 10 independents say that she should have been indicted even though, oddly, only 33% say the whole issue makes it less likely for them to support her.http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/majority-disapproves-decision-charge-clinton-emails-poll/story?id=40445344
It's really not hard to understand at all.
11 Jul 16
Originally posted by whodeyDepending on who the incompetent liar who broke the law was, I'd also rather have an incompetent liar who broke the law rather than Trump... just not Hillary.
In other words, they would rather have an incompetent liar who broke the law rather than Trump.
It's really not hard to understand at all.
That's why I will probably vote for Gary Johnson, and Jill Stein is my second choice. My third choice is writing in Mickey Mouse.
Originally posted by whodeyLooking at the numbers, there seems to be a very small subset who think Hillary should have been indicted, but will vote for her anyway.
In other words, they would rather have an incompetent liar who broke the law rather than Trump.
It's really not hard to understand at all.
I kinda agree that that is rather irrational.
Originally posted by no1marauder“State is the name of the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly it lies; and this lie slips from its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.”
Looking at the numbers, there seems to be a very small subset who think Hillary should have been indicted, but will vote for her anyway.
I kinda agree that that is rather irrational.
― Friedrich Nietzsche
11 Jul 16
Originally posted by whodeyThe difficulty understanding has to do with your ability to think, not the difficulty of the problem. (or more likely your dishonesty in claiming not to understand something so obvious).
In other words, they would rather have an incompetent liar who broke the law rather than Trump.
It's really not hard to understand at all.
11 Jul 16
Originally posted by sh76I shal vote for No1 but Kazet is a close second.
Depending on who the incompetent liar who broke the law was, I'd also rather have an incompetent liar who broke the law rather than Trump... just not Hillary.
That's why I will probably vote for Gary Johnson, and Jill Stein is my second choice. My third choice is writing in Mickey Mouse.