Originally posted by zeeblebotRetard, the presence of this new law would not have made the Governor of Louisiana call out the troops any quicker and the President wouldn't have called out troops in that case before the Governor (politics). And your own wiki article says that the states have compacts between them regarding the use of each other's National Guard troops which should have been put into effect. Thus, the law is not necessary for natural disasters like Katrina and that sad chapter has nothing to do with the law.
next time you read it, start with your "Originally posted" post, included at the top.
- Joined
- 20 Oct 02
- Moves
- 610682
Originally posted by no1marauderDefeatist, whats the difference between a catfish and an attorney?...One is a scum sucking bottom feeder, the other is a fish.😵😵
Retard, the presence of this new law would not have made the Governor of Louisiana call out the troops any quicker and the President wouldn't have called out troops in that case before the Governor (politics). And your own wiki article says that the states have compacts between them regarding the use of each other's National Guard troops which should hav ...[text shortened]... essary for natural disasters like Katrina and that sad chapter has nothing to do with the law.
Originally posted by no1marauderwipe the drool off your monitor ... you said governors don't hesitate, the wiki article says au contraire ... my OP that you are trying (and failing) to quibble with said that maybe Katrina was the basis for the new law ...
Retard, the presence of this new law would not have made the Governor of Louisiana call out the troops any quicker and the President wouldn't have called out troops in that case before the Governor (politics). And your own wiki article says that the states have compacts between them regarding the use of each other's National Guard troops which should hav ...[text shortened]... essary for natural disasters like Katrina and that sad chapter has nothing to do with the law.
Blanco HESITATED. with the new law, Bush need not HESITATE. and whiners like you need not (but probably will anyway) WHINE that the troops weren't called out soon enough.
1 edit
Originally posted by zeeblebotOffer SOME evidence that the events of Katrina had ANYTHING to do with the new law. Please. The bill was part of a defense funding authorization law, a funny place to put legislation IF what you are concerned about is natural disasters.
wipe the drool off your monitor ... you said governors don't hesitate, the wiki article says au contraire ... my OP that you are trying (and failing) to quibble with said that maybe Katrina was the basis for the new law ...
Blanco HESITATED. with the new law, Bush need not HESITATE. and whiners like you need not (but probably will anyway) WHINE that the troops weren't called out soon enough.
Originally posted by no1marauderdo i need to offer any? ... does the bill a law appears in always relate to the law? ... if that was true, how did Robert Byrd build his little empire? ...
Offer SOME evidence that the events of Katrina had ANYTHING to do with the new law. Please. The bill was part of a defense funding authorization law, a funny place to put legislation IF what you are concerned about is natural disasters.
1 edit
Originally posted by zeeblebotSince you made the claim, yes you should offer some evidence to support it. That's how debate works, though you seem to think it consists entirely of cutting and posting wikipedia articles and press releases from the US government.
do i need to offer any? ... does the bill a law appears in always relate to the law? ... if that was true, how did Robert Byrd build his little empire? ...
Originally posted by no1marauderYeah, that .. and then a lot of personal insults
Since you made the claim, yes you should offer some evidence to support it. That's how debate works, though you seem to think it consists entirely of cutting and posting wikipedia articles and press releases from the US government.
Originally posted by no1marauderactually, that Katrina post was all the cut-and-paste i needed, if you can recall a more relevant, recent instance of "public disorder" in the USA, please call it out.
Since you made the claim, yes you should offer some evidence to support it. That's how debate works, though you seem to think it consists entirely of cutting and posting wikipedia articles and press releases from the US government.
Originally posted by zeeblebotWhich, of course, the new law wouldn't have made any difference in unless you seriously believe that the Bush administration which responded glacially to the entire incident would have federalized the Louisiana National Guard before the Louisiana Governor did.
actually, that Katrina post was all the cut-and-paste i needed, if you can recall a more relevant, recent instance of "public disorder" in the USA, please call it out.
Your "argument" is ludicrous.
Originally posted by no1maraudernot at all, wouldn't expect someone from your neighborhood to be much aware on the topic, but FEMA is not the first responder for hurricanes, state and local authorities are. it was Blanco's responsibility to call out the guard in this incident.
Which, of course, the new law wouldn't have made any difference in unless you seriously believe that the Bush administration which responded glacially to the entire incident would have federalized the Louisiana National Guard before the Louisiana Governor did.
Your "argument" is ludicrous.