Go back
Meaningful democracy.

Meaningful democracy.

Debates

f
Quack Quack Quack !

Chesstralia

Joined
18 Aug 03
Moves
54533
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

i believe the money machine destrys democracy.

the politicians use money to advertise and pork-barrel and bribe us into voting for them.

what is the point?

why not just make the richest b@&$!@&d the king?

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89790
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by flexmore
i believe the money machine destrys democracy.

the politicians use money to advertise and pork-barrel and bribe us into voting for them.

what is the point?

why not just make the richest b@&$!@&d the king?
Democracy in its current state is nothing more than a circus to make people feel they have a choice in the matter.

s

Joined
23 Sep 05
Moves
11774
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by flexmore
i believe the money machine destrys democracy.

the politicians use money to advertise and pork-barrel and bribe us into voting for them.

what is the point?

why not just make the richest b@&$!@&d the king?
Indeed. What's your definition of democracy?

ab

Joined
28 Nov 05
Moves
24334
Clock
19 Dec 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by flexmore
i believe the money machine destrys democracy.
that and the Party system

CliffLandin
Human

Burnsville, NC, USA

Joined
21 Nov 04
Moves
216990
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by aging blitzer
that and the Party system
By the Party system what do you mean? Any party system or the two party system that is prevalent in the US?

ab

Joined
28 Nov 05
Moves
24334
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

wellll, probably only when they become so large as to be able to abuse their power.

CliffLandin
Human

Burnsville, NC, USA

Joined
21 Nov 04
Moves
216990
Clock
19 Dec 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by aging blitzer
wellll, probably only when they become so large as to be able to abuse their power.
I agree, that is why I am not registered as a Democan or Republocrat. Most people in the US feel that that is it. They don't realize that, at least on a non-Presidential level, the Greens have a very viable party. The Liberetarians are growing as well.

What also annoys me is how many people think that the US is a democracy.

A democracy is:
A democracy is direct government ruled by the majority

A republic is:
A Republic is representative government ruled by law (the Constitution)

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
20 May 05
Moves
2728
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Democracy in its current state is nothing more than a circus to make people feel they have a choice in the matter.
Thumps up thats true.

I believe that democracy like communism will only work as the general idea. Once the politicians are corrupted there is no way to get back the real idea about THE PEOPLE and their influence.

Besides what really kills democracy is the overruling by making too many laws.
The German Tax Law is a good example. IMHO the best thing to do is burn it.

Once the honour for serving your country as a politician and doing the will of the people is replaced with greed and money interest the chaos starts. Out of this chaos the people loose their feeling for what to do not because its against the law or against the ethics. Everybody gets greedy then.

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Democracy in its current state is nothing more than a circus to make people feel they have a choice in the matter.
""A man is none the less a slave
because he is allowed to choose
a new master once in a term of years."
-- Lysander Spooner
(1808-1887) Political theorist, activist, abolitionist

TM

Joined
17 Jun 05
Moves
9211
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Well the fairest way to get a demorcasy would be if anyone who wanted to enter into it could and they got the same amount of money to fund there party also the same amount of airtime on tv etc...

Also a better system on voteing would be if you can vote for as many candidates as you wish but only once for each candidte therefor you could vote for all the left partys or just one party. Or if there was a party you are strongly opposed to all but that party if you thought all the others were ok..

The main problem with the current system is that if you don't like the main party there is nothing at all you can do to change it.

CliffLandin
Human

Burnsville, NC, USA

Joined
21 Nov 04
Moves
216990
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Will Everitt
Well the fairest way to get a demorcasy would be if anyone who wanted to enter into it could and they got the same amount of money to fund there party also the same amount of airtime on tv etc...

Also a better system on voteing would be if you can vote for as many candidates as you wish but only once for each candidte therefor you could vote for all ...[text shortened]... ystem is that if you don't like the main party there is nothing at all you can do to change it.
By "change it" what do you mean? If by change it you mean vote it out there are a number of options, but it has to start on a local level. It is much easier to get a Libertarian or Green elected in a local election than it is to get one on the Presidential ballot.

I agree with you that there must be financial reform to the election process, levelling the playing ground for those without a rich daddy.

TM

Joined
17 Jun 05
Moves
9211
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by CliffLandin
By "change it" what do you mean? If by change it you mean vote it out there are a number of options, but it has to start on a local level. It is much easier to get a Libertarian or Green elected in a local election than it is to get one on the Presidential ballot.

I agree with you that there must be financial reform to the election process, levelling the playing ground for those without a rich daddy.
I mean on a national scale.

Amaurote
No Name Maddox

County Doledrum

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
16156
Clock
19 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

There can be no true democracy without legal and economic equality. When people talk about the money machine in the narrow sense of the party machine, it's worth remembering that our entire society is a money machine. Only a system as sick as the West could consider equality of opportunity an unnecessary prerequisite for its precious meritocracy.

caissad4
Child of the Novelty

San Antonio, Texas

Joined
08 Mar 04
Moves
618778
Clock
20 Dec 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Here in the US we have dispensed with that archaic system called a Democracy and have developed our own form of Plutarchy.
And we keep the people under-educated so they hardly notice anything.

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
20 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by flexmore
i believe the money machine destrys democracy.

the politicians use money to advertise and pork-barrel and bribe us into voting for them.

what is the point?

why not just make the richest b@&$!@&d the king?
It is a well known and documented fact that the CIA has influenced the politics of other nations by simply bank-rolling the party they wish to win. In almost all cases they have been successfull. This shows that elections can and do get won by money and the CIA and the US government know this.
The CIA has also helped a number of dictators to win through monetary support.

Although I dont believe that any government is truely democratic, I would still prefer to live in a country that has regular elections to living in a country with a dictatorship.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.