Go back
Meanwhile, In Los Angeles

Meanwhile, In Los Angeles

Debates


@booger said
@mghrn55

Well first y'all called it global cooling and said an ice age was coming and then global warming was supposed to make it too hot to live and now it's called climate change because y'all don't know what the hell y'all talking about.

Those experts said life on earth would be unlivable by now. Y'all look stupid.
True, in the 60's there were lots of articles by the Big Brain Scientists about how a new ice age was coming.


@booger said
Billionaires have nothing to do with the middle class and lower.

Having a few rich people means nothing.
They're competing with the middle class for houses.


@athousandyoung said
They're competing with the middle class for houses.
Ya I'm against the super rich.
My idea was a limit on wealth. Anything over that limit is donated away.

Having billionaires in California doesn't equate it with success all around.
California is becoming a failure.

Ironically it got most of its success under a republican named Reagan. No?


@mghrn55 said
Coming from the dirtiest oil on the planet. Alberta oil sands.
Oh wait. You haven't shared with the forum where you stand on the threat on climate change.
Please tell us.
Is it real ?? Or is it a hoax ??
Start a thread....you are aware that very smart scientists or what-have-you are in different schools of thought. Pick one. I do think that our little bitty populace cannot do anything about global climate, esp since India and China keep pumping. I think the money would be better used to get richer so we can kick China ass.


@athousandyoung said
They're competing with the middle class for houses.
? They are mansion people, you and I live on Maple street. I don't get your meaning. Of course, they may buy farmland and Build houses, to meet a demand of the populace (and, I'm sorry, get rich doing it, tsk tsk), but the populace is ever-so grateful. And probably not mad at the rich investor/builders who provided all the houses.
I don't get your meaning.


@booger said
Ya I'm against the super rich.
My idea was a limit on wealth. Anything over that limit is donated away.

Having billionaires in California doesn't equate it with success all around.
California is becoming a failure.

Ironically it got most of its success under a republican named Reagan. No?
Your 2nd paragraph is over my head, but do tell us what the limit should be on a typical 'super rich', as you mention above.


@AThousandYoung said - "You are mistaken about how "overwhelming" the CA Dem vote is."
----------------------------


Really?!

California's two US Senators - both Democrat (Feinstein/Padila).
California's 52 US Representatives: 40 Democrat, 12 Republican.
California's Governor: Democrat

Not exactly sure where you are coming from, ATY, California is highly Democrat


@averagejoe1 said
Your 2nd paragraph is over my head, but do tell us what the limit should be on a typical 'super rich', as you mention above.
Nobody needs more than 30 million and you can't buy anything more after that.

Excessive greed hurts society.

Don't like the wealth limit then someone else will happily provide and reach that limit.

You ain't got 2 nickels to rub together so I think the 30 mill limit is fine for you.

1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Why do libs have a problem with successful billionaires? Job creators, such as that. Movie makers we enjoy watching, and so on. I dont get it.
Yes. Four creators/inventors - Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn (internet)
Together ,their creations made an IT industry that employs billions of people.

Is anybody foolish enough to think that this level of creativity can be found in communist countries?
North Korea and Cuba,, how sad.


@booger said
Nobody needs more than 30 million and you can't buy anything more after that.

Excessive greed hurts society.

Don't like the wealth limit then someone else will happily provide and reach that limit.

You ain't got 2 nickels to rub together so I think the 30 mill limit is fine for you.
Let me ask you something...

Bezos needs $billions to start a business, where is he going to get it? Would he try to launch such a business
when he can never make as much money as he has invested??

It's not so simple as how you word it.


The natural compromise which has shown itself to be most effective is progressive taxation with high taxes on extreme wealth like we used to have before the Neocon Revolt.

1 edit

@earl-of-trumps said
Yes. Four creators/inventors - Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn (internet)
Together ,their creations made an IT industry that employs billions of people.

Is anybody foolish enough to think that this level of creativity can be found in communist countries?
North Korea and Cuba,, how sad.
They're sure AF not in conservative States. Apple is HQ'd in CA, Gates is in WA and Kahn is practically a socialist by today's right wing definitions. Cerf got all his training and did all his work in CA.

Silicon Valley is a California phenomenon.

1 edit

@earl-of-trumps said
Let me ask you something...

Bezos needs $billions to start a business, where is he going to get it? Would he try to launch such a business
when he can never make as much money as he has invested??

It's not so simple as how you word it.
"Needs" is an interesting choice of word. So one of the richest men in the world "needs" more money so he can set up a business by which he can make even more money.

Bezos' company Amazon is HQ'd in WA btw


@averagejoe1 said
? They are mansion people, you and I live on Maple street. I don't get your meaning. Of course, they may buy farmland and Build houses, to meet a demand of the populace (and, I'm sorry, get rich doing it, tsk tsk), but the populace is ever-so grateful. And probably not mad at the rich investor/builders who provided all the houses.
I don't get your meaning.
You talk about "making money while you sleep" but you aren't aware of investment properties?

1 edit

@earl-of-trumps said
Let me ask you something...

Bezos needs $billions to start a business, where is he going to get it? Would he try to launch such a business
when he can never make as much money as he has invested??

It's not so simple as how you word it.
You think people need a lot of money to start a business?

Most of the success around you is from some guy starting in his garage.

Amazon started in his garage.

"Jeff Bezos quit his job at an investment bank in 1994 and moved to Seattle, Washington, to open a virtual bookstore. Working out of his garage with a handful of employees, Bezos began developing the software for the site, which he called Amazon.com. It sold its first book in 1995."