09 Oct 21
In accusing Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI, Special Counsel John Durham offers new evidence of the fabrications behind the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory.
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/09/21/with-clinton-lawyer-charged-the-russiagate-scam-is-now-under-indictment/
@metal-brain saidDurham is just another Trump mouthpiece.
In accusing Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI, Special Counsel John Durham offers new evidence of the fabrications behind the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory.
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/09/21/with-clinton-lawyer-charged-the-russiagate-scam-is-now-under-indictment/
He should at least try not to make it so obvious.
@metal-brain saidOooh. Accusations? Let's talk fabrications. Lying under oath. Not accusations. Convictions.
In accusing Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI, Special Counsel John Durham offers new evidence of the fabrications behind the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory.
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/09/21/with-clinton-lawyer-charged-the-russiagate-scam-is-now-under-indictment/
George papadopoulos. George nader. rick gates . Michael flynn. Michael cohen. Paul manafort. Roger stone. Steve bannon.
All of these people are convicted criminals who worked for trump during the 2016 campaign. Some of them lied or refused to speak about trump's russia ties. There are others I couldn't remember them all.
09 Oct 21
@metal-brain saidYour posting this so long after it was reported, makes me wonder if you watch the real news? You haven't known about this?
In accusing Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI, Special Counsel John Durham offers new evidence of the fabrications behind the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory.
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/09/21/with-clinton-lawyer-charged-the-russiagate-scam-is-now-under-indictment/
09 Oct 21
@wildgrass saidLet's talk about George Papadopoulos. What did he do wrong?
Oooh. Accusations? Let's talk fabrications. Lying under oath. Not accusations. Convictions.
George papadopoulos. George nader. rick gates . Michael flynn. Michael cohen. Paul manafort. Roger stone. Steve bannon.
All of these people are convicted criminals who worked for trump during the 2016 campaign. Some of them lied or refused to speak about trump's russia ties. There are others I couldn't remember them all.
15 Oct 21
@metal-brain saidPapadopoulos pleaded guilty to a felony charge of making false statements to FBI agents about the timing and the possible significance of his contacts in 2016 relating to U.S.–Russia relations and the Donald Trump presidential campaign.
Let's talk about George Papadopoulos. What did he do wrong?
16 Oct 21
@wildgrass saidFalse statements about what? What contacts? What does it have to do with Trump?
Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to a felony charge of making false statements to FBI agents about the timing and the possible significance of his contacts in 2016 relating to U.S.–Russia relations and the Donald Trump presidential campaign.
All he did was repeat a rumor he heard. That is how Russiagate got started. It was started by a mere unconfirmed rumor, not evidence. If lack of evidence is enough to ridicule a conspiracy theory then Russiagate is a ridiculous conspiracy theory that even a subsequent exhaustive investigation was unable to turn up any evidence.
Add to that all the lying and fabricated evidence to continue the investigation and you have a witch hunt. Not the first one Mueller went on either.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2017/05/21/when_comey_and_mueller_bungled_the_anthrax_case_133953.html#!
https://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/robert-mueller-botching-investigations-since-anthrax-attacks/
16 Oct 21
@metal-brain saidTell us all about lying and manufactured evidence. You're the expert.
False statements about what? What contacts? What does it have to do with Trump?
All he did was repeat a rumor he heard. That is how Russiagate got started. It was started by a mere unconfirmed rumor, not evidence. If lack of evidence is enough to ridicule a conspiracy theory then Russiagate is a ridiculous conspiracy theory that even a subsequent exhaustive investigati ...[text shortened]...
https://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/robert-mueller-botching-investigations-since-anthrax-attacks/
@suzianne saidThe FBI's Kevin Clinesmith plead guilty to altering an email from the CIA to the GCO, in which Trump campaign adviser Carter Page was described as a source for the agency, to say he was not a source – which cleared the way for the FBI to request a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant against Page as a “Russian agent”.
Tell us all about lying and manufactured evidence. You're the expert.
https://www.rt.com/usa/498070-clinesmith-fbi-guilty-russiagate/
But wait, there is more. The CIA fabricated evidence too.
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/cia-fabricated-russiagate-evidence-says-former-nsa-tech-chief-video/
And now Sussmann has been charged with lying to the FBI.
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/09/21/with-clinton-lawyer-charged-the-russiagate-scam-is-now-under-indictment/
Happy?
16 Oct 21
@metal-brain saidMaybe I would be if you had cited actual sources instead of propaganda sources.
The FBI's Kevin Clinesmith plead guilty to altering an email from the CIA to the GCO, in which Trump campaign adviser Carter Page was described as a source for the agency, to say he was not a source – which cleared the way for the FBI to request a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant against Page as a “Russian agent”.
https://www.rt.com/usa/498070-cline ...[text shortened]... g/news/2021/09/21/with-clinton-lawyer-charged-the-russiagate-scam-is-now-under-indictment/
Happy?
16 Oct 21
@suzianne saidThe FBI's Kevin Clinesmith plead guilty to altering an email from the CIA to the GCO, in which Trump campaign adviser Carter Page was described as a source for the agency, to say he was not a source – which cleared the way for the FBI to request a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant against Page as a “Russian agent”.
Maybe I would be if you had cited actual sources instead of propaganda sources.
Do you dispute that fact? What source would you believe? More importantly, why is a fact not believable because of the source that gives you that fact? All you have to do is prove it wrong if it is not really a fact.
You are just being lazy and making up lame excuses for it. More likely, you know I am capable of proving my claims and you are desperately trying to avoid the uncomfortable truth.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-clinesmith-idUSKBN29Y1CB
There you go. Is Reuters a propaganda source too?
Your attack the source tactics are a huge failure. You know I can prove what I say.
@metal-brain saidThis is classic misdirection by you.
The FBI's Kevin Clinesmith plead guilty to altering an email from the CIA to the GCO, in which Trump campaign adviser Carter Page was described as a source for the agency, to say he was not a source – which cleared the way for the FBI to request a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant against Page as a “Russian agent”.
Do you dispute that fact? What sou ...[text shortened]... da source too?
Your attack the source tactics are a huge failure. You know I can prove what I say.
You take one Fact A, and then try to connect it to Action B, Action C and Action D, when there is no such connection.
Then you claim and fight that "Hey, Fact A is totally legit!"
No one is arguing that it is not. What they argue about is your falsified connection to everything else in your house of cards.
16 Oct 21
@suzianne saidhttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-clinesmith-idUSKBN29Y1CB
This is classic misdirection by you.
You take one Fact A, and then try to connect it to Action B, Action C and Action D, when there is no such connection.
Then you claim and fight that "Hey, Fact A is totally legit!"
No one is arguing that it is not. What they argue about is your falsified connection to everything else in your house of cards.
There you go. Is Reuters a propaganda source too? LOL!
😆