30 Dec '11 08:35>
Off death row, largely because the victim's widow threw in the towel.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/08/us/execution-case-dropped-against-convicted-cop-killer.html?_r=1
But he's still in prison.
Based on my reading, I think he most likely pulled the trigger, although if it was based on an impulse while watching his brother be beaten by the officer, I don't think it should be a death penalty case even though a police officer was the victim. Then again, I don't believe in the death penalty.
But I do believe he's guilty of murder sans "special circumstances."
On the other hand, the trial was seriously mishandled by the judge. Whether the witnesses who said they saw or heard another person running from the scene was evidence of innocence was really up to the jury and not the prosecution or the judge. He is entitled to a retrial in my view, though I personally don't find the evidence compelling - based upon what I've read. Still, I would reserve absolute judgment until I heard the testimony - something the jury did not hear.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/08/us/execution-case-dropped-against-convicted-cop-killer.html?_r=1
But he's still in prison.
Based on my reading, I think he most likely pulled the trigger, although if it was based on an impulse while watching his brother be beaten by the officer, I don't think it should be a death penalty case even though a police officer was the victim. Then again, I don't believe in the death penalty.
But I do believe he's guilty of murder sans "special circumstances."
On the other hand, the trial was seriously mishandled by the judge. Whether the witnesses who said they saw or heard another person running from the scene was evidence of innocence was really up to the jury and not the prosecution or the judge. He is entitled to a retrial in my view, though I personally don't find the evidence compelling - based upon what I've read. Still, I would reserve absolute judgment until I heard the testimony - something the jury did not hear.