Must you have a uterus to have a valid opinion on abortion?

Originally posted by @whodey
But SCOTUS decides everything for everyone.

So considering this, should only women be deciding court rulings like Roe vs. Wade?

How about the idea that men want to control every aspect of the lives of women including reproduction? Do you deny that is an issue? Why do you think Roe V Wade made it through SCOTUS? It was an invective to men who want to control every aspect of the lives of women.
The person who has the say about her body is the woman, not ANY man.
Tough titty if you disagree.

Originally posted by @whodey
The woman I was talking to was a Leftist feminist and said that I had no right
to comment on abortion because I was a male, thus attempting to silence me.

Either she was a complete idiot or you are giving us
an out of context, biased version of the conversation.

Of course both could be true.

It seems to me that women would know better than men as to whether what has been inside them is really a human being, which is what needs to be decided regarding abortion.

This was never decided in Roe vs Wade.

Perhaps this is why more women than men tend to be against abortion.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2014/apr/30/why-are-women-more-opposed-to-abortion

in fact, the woman responsible for the Roe vs. Wade decision is now pro-life.

https://www.liveaction.org/news/roe-v-wade-exploitation-mccorvey/

Originally posted by @whodey
It seems to me that women would know better than men as to whether what has been inside them is really a human being, which is what needs to be decided regarding abortion.

This was never decided in Roe vs Wade.

Perhaps this is why more women than men tend to be against abortion.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2014/apr/30/why-a ...[text shortened]... e decision is now pro-life.

https://www.liveaction.org/news/roe-v-wade-exploitation-mccorvey/

http://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/

"Men and women express similar views on abortion; 59% of women say it should be legal in all or most cases, as do 55% of men."

Originally posted by @whodey
It seems to me that women would know better than men as to whether what has been inside them is really a human being, which is what needs to be decided regarding abortion.

This was never decided in Roe vs Wade.

Perhaps this is why more women than men tend to be against abortion.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2014/apr/30/why-a ...[text shortened]... e decision is now pro-life.

https://www.liveaction.org/news/roe-v-wade-exploitation-mccorvey/

This has nothing to do with Roe vs Wade.
Stop throwing your retarded US legal system at us.

And it’s got nothing to do with women.

It’s got to do with A woman and HER body.

Nobody can tell you you’re not allowed to chop your own nuts off. Your body, your choice.

What’s so bloody difficult about it?

Originally posted by @lundos
http://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/

"Men and women express similar views on abortion; 59% of women say it should be legal in all or most cases, as do 55% of men."

You obviously did not read my article.

If you ask if abortion should be curtailed, the polls change.

Most women think there should be restrictions as where men not so much.

Originally posted by @whodey
You obviously did not read my article.

If you ask if abortion should be curtailed, the polls change.

Most women think there should be restrictions as where men not so much.

I did read it.

What you wrote was:
Perhaps this is why more women than men tend to be against abortion.

And that is not correct.

From your article:
"YouGov’s 2012 poll suggests that slightly more men than women want to ban abortion completely (8% vs 5😵."

Originally posted by @whodey
The woman I was talking to was a Leftist feminist and said that I had no right to comment on abortion because I was a male, thus attempting to silence me.

When arguing with an idiot stop arguing....otherwise, you're the idiot.

Originally posted by @uzless
When arguing with an idiot stop arguing....otherwise, you're the idiot.

Well, to be truthful here... there’s a bit of irony in your statement.

Just a bit...

Originally posted by @shavixmir
This has nothing to do with Roe vs Wade.
Stop throwing your retarded US legal system at us.

And it’s got nothing to do with women.

It’s got to do with A woman and HER body.

Nobody can tell you you’re not allowed to chop your own nuts off. Your body, your choice.

What’s so bloody difficult about it?

Can I chop my Siamese Twin off?

Originally posted by @athousandyoung
Can I chop my Siamese Twin off?

In all the years this subject has been discussed on this forum, this seems to be the first time anybody’s ever mentioned the imagined conjoined-twin dillemma.

See, try as you might to forge a similarity to the female-foetus situation, I’m pretty sure you are capable of recognising the differences.

The most important, obviously, being that a foetus is paracitical to the female’s body, but that conjoined twins share various body parts.

Equally obviously, the US pro-life, pro-gun, pro-war and and pro-death-penalty lobby tries as hard as possible to tell you that 2 mature adults sharing a body is exactly the same as a clump of cells in a womb.

But they are retards.

Originally posted by @whodey
It seems to me that women would know better than men as to whether what has been inside them is really a human being,

Why?
How on Earth does a woman know that?

That is the big debate

Originally posted by @whodey
... this is why more women than men tend to be against abortion.

Even if true ... irrelevant.

If 99% of women were against abortion and men were 50/50 so what?

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
Why?
How on Earth does a woman know that?

That is the big debate

It's not a debate at all. Everybody recognizes it is a human being.

Pro-Choice people just arbitrarily claim it isn't a "person"

Originally posted by @shavixmir
In all the years this subject has been discussed on this forum, this seems to be the first time anybody’s ever mentioned the imagined conjoined-twin dillemma.

See, try as you might to forge a similarity to the female-foetus situation, I’m pretty sure you are capable of recognising the differences.

The most important, obviously, being that a foetus i ...[text shortened]... dults sharing a body is exactly the same as a clump of cells in a womb.

But they are retards.

How about a parasitic twin vs an eight month fetus?