@kevcvs57 saidYou are the liar. I never said vote rigging at all.
Liar no one ever said that the election was rigged or defrauded in terms of votes and Hilary conceded in good time as did the democrat party em masse,
Claiming that Russians interfered with the election process by the use of troll farms to swing it for trump is just stating a fact and there is no denying that members of trumps team met the Russians. Trump called on them to ...[text shortened]... claiming they are not THE president.
Can you Russians actually open your cake holes without lying?
You are attempting to move the goal post.
"Claiming that Russians interfered with the election process by the use of troll farms to swing it for trump is just stating a fact "
See? You still allege election meddling proving exactly what I said. You will not accept 2016 was a fair election. You will not let go of that conspiracy theory.
2 edits
@metal-brain saidThe Mueller investigation also found election meddling from Russia. So her statement is accurate.
She alleged election meddling. That is not free and fair, is it?
I never said election fraud. You are trying to move the goal post.
@vivify saidI never said election fraud.
Hillary doesn't claim election fraud in that link. You obviously didn'tee listen your own video.
Unlike Trump, Hillary also conceded immediately. She also didn't organize protestors to "stop the steal" and interrupt the transfer of power. Nor did she try to fight the election results in 60 different courts, or pressure a state election official to "find" more votes for her.
So it is you that tried to move the goal post inspiring others to falsely claim I did.
Sonhouse said fair and free. You are a dishonest cad.
1 edit
@metal-brain saidYawn.
I never said election fraud.
So it is you that tried to move the goal post inspiring others to falsely claim I did.
Sonhouse said fair and free. You are a dishonest cad.
You're trying to draw an equivalence between Hillary and Trump when there is none. That's the point.
@vivify said"The Mueller investigation also found election meddling from Russia. So her statement is accurate."
She never claimed that in the interview either. You obviously didn't watch your own video.
Didn't keep her from alleging election meddling
The Mueller investigation also found election meddling from Russia. So her statement is accurate.
That is not true. Any competent hacker can pretend to be someone else to fool people into thinking it is just about anybody. The CIA's UMBRAGE proved that.
Crowdstrike stated under oath that there was "no evidence of exfiltration". That means there is no evidence the DNC was hacked by Russia.
For all you know I hacked the DNC pretending to be GRU. What part od "no evidence" do you not understand?
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-firms_sworn_testimony_it_had_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html
https://consortiumnews.com/2020/05/09/ray-mcgovern-new-house-documents-sow-further-doubt-that-russia-hacked-the-dnc/
You are promoting a debunked conspiracy theory.
@metal-brain saidJesus h Christ we know the troll farm is in St Petersburg and we know it run by Wagner, that did not make trump illegitimate and it didn’t change the fact that trump got more votes than Clinton for whatever reason. But Americans need to know that a sworn enemy of the US wanted a particular candidate to win and that candidate was Trump and you can bet they want Trump to win in 2024.
You are the liar. I never said vote rigging at all.
You are attempting to move the goal post.
"Claiming that Russians interfered with the election process by the use of troll farms to swing it for trump is just stating a fact "
See? You still allege election meddling proving exactly what I said. You will not accept 2016 was a fair election. You will not let go of that conspiracy theory.
@vivify saidOnce again, you are dishonestly attempting to move the goal post. I never claimed an absolute equivalence. This is all I said:
Yawn.
You're trying to draw an equivalence between Hillary and Trump when there is none. That's the point.
Complaining day after day that Trump is an illegitimate president is not accepting the results of elections. The majority of Americans do not accept the results of elections unless their party wins.
https://abcnews.go.com/theview/video/hillary-clinton-calls-donald-trump-illegitimate-president-66010832
All I did was state a fact. That is not accepting the results of elections.
@kevcvs57 saidDoes that mean you accept Trump won the 2016 election fairly and that Hillary calling Trump an illegitimate president was a false allegation?
Jesus h Christ we know the troll farm is in St Petersburg and we know it run by Wagner, that did not make trump illegitimate and it didn’t change the fact that trump got more votes than Clinton for whatever reason. But Americans need to know that a sworn enemy of the US wanted a particular candidate to win and that candidate was Trump and you can bet they want Trump to win in 2024.
@Metal-Brain
Holy SHYTE, you really think the traitor Trump won? I didn't think you were THAT far gone.
@metal-brain saidIt’s a fact that Russia used troll factories to aide the trump campaign that’s a fact amongst the grown ups junior.
You are the liar. I never said vote rigging at all.
You are attempting to move the goal post.
"Claiming that Russians interfered with the election process by the use of troll farms to swing it for trump is just stating a fact "
See? You still allege election meddling proving exactly what I said. You will not accept 2016 was a fair election. You will not let go of that conspiracy theory.
That in no way invalidates trumps election win, if people are stupid enough to be swayed by the stupid 💩 coming out of a troll factory domestic or foreign then hey. It’s worth acknowledging because you then have to ask yourself why a sworn adversary of US hegemony wants Trump to win.
You stupid stupid man
@kevcvs57 saidYou are wrong.
It’s a fact that Russia used troll factories to aide the trump campaign that’s a fact amongst the grown ups junior.
That in no way invalidates trumps election win, if people are stupid enough to be swayed by the stupid 💩 coming out of a troll factory domestic or foreign then hey. It’s worth acknowledging because you then have to ask yourself why a sworn adversary of US hegemony wants Trump to win.
You stupid stupid man
You are still clinging onto a debunked conspiracy theory.
@kevcvs57 saidMost voters are worried that next year’s presidential election could be affected by cheating, and nearly half agree with a popular song challenging the legitimacy of Joe Biden’s election in 2020.
Your lying again the majority of Americans accept the results of elections, they might not like the result but they accept them, it’s a large minority of the GOP and of course the Donald and his zombie followers. Most GOP members accept the result of the 2020 election regardless of what they tell pollsters.
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/biden_administration/81_million_votes_nearly_half_say_no_way
@Metal-Brain
All your BULLSHYTE means NOTHING because Trump LOST you POS commie.
You are DESPERATELY trying to deflect from the op, that Neal Katyal LITERALLY saved our democracy.
I guess you are disappointed SCOTUS actually stopped that sick state law.
@metal-brain saidSomeone heard a new phrase today.
I never said election fraud.
So it is you that tried to move the goal post inspiring others to falsely claim I did.
Sonhouse said fair and free. You are a dishonest cad.
Now write "I will not move the goal posts" 100 times on the chalkboard like Bart Simpson.
@metal-brain saidThen what was it that Assange released? Russian-doctored emails. Right after Trump asked Russia to "find the emails". Are you saying that Russia faked Hillary's emails, since they didn't get them from her?
"The Mueller investigation also found election meddling from Russia. So her statement is accurate."
That is not true. Any competent hacker can pretend to be someone else to fool people into thinking it is just about anybody. The CIA's UMBRAGE proved that.
Crowdstrike stated under oath that there was "no evidence of exfiltration". That means there is no evidence the DN ...[text shortened]... nts-sow-further-doubt-that-russia-hacked-the-dnc/
You are promoting a debunked conspiracy theory.
Here's another bullet for the other foot.