@dood111 saidDood, they (mainly Vivify) do this. They muddle things up, ask you for stuff that is readily available on the internet, I assume to just get you dithered having to fool with them. Too late though, you have already taken his bait. Bet you won't again. Many worthless sentences from these people. You will see it coming when their post has nothing to do with the crux of the title, or, you will see it coming if you just see who the author is. check out the stuff from Suzianne.
It's a two minute clip and you refuse to watch it but you want us to write a detailed description of what they are doing?
Anything else you want us to do for you?
@averagejoe1 saidYeah I knew vivify was suckering me in but I just couldn't help it, he was being such a passive-aggressive doosh.
Dood, they (mainly Vivify) do this. They muddle things up, ask you for stuff that is readily available on the internet, I assume to just get you dithered having to fool with them. Too late though, you have already taken his bait. Bet you won't again. Many worthless sentences from these people. You will see it coming when their post has nothing to do with the crux of ...[text shortened]... e, or, you will see it coming if you just see who the author is. check out the stuff from Suzianne.
@dood111 saidLords was 16 when she started her adult film career (Willingly and using fake identification) but I see your point.
Netflix made it available to the public and broadcast it , so I disagree, they certainly are to blame.
Years ago the same thing happened to a lot of video stores that had Traci Lords tapes for rent, they didn't know she was only 14, but they got prosecuted for having child porn anyway.
@averagejoe1 saidIn other words, you don't like having to back up your false claims. Like when you started a thread implying Mueller's team wiped cell phones on purpose; when called out you were forced to admit you had zero reason to believe any thing suspicious happened.
Dood, they (mainly Vivify) do this. They muddle things up, ask you for stuff that is readily available on the internet
No wonder you're ranting.
@vivify saidVivify...now, stay with me here. "Zero reason to believe anything suspicious happened". You just wrote that. Snope it, Vivify. I said nothing close to that. You and MG and Suzianne need to go to the 'Debate with Truth' class and re-take the exam.
In other words, you don't like having to back up your false claims. Like when you started a thread implying Mueller's team wiped cell phones on purpose; when called out you were forced to admit you had zero reason to believe any thing suspicious happened.
No wonder you're ranting.
@averagejoe1 saidWhen Suzianne starts lecturing people about lying, I have to laugh my ass off. Jeeezus
Y'all see what I mean!?!??
@earl-of-trumps saidI think it is a moderator in disguise that is in there to keep us all entertained! No one could come across like that in the real world....except someone approaching first grade. I'm sure she means well. There has to be a statement in there somewhere with merit. But all the ones I remember have to do with dependency. Entertaining.
When Suzianne starts lecturing people about lying, I have to laugh my ass off. Jeeezus
@averagejoe1 saidYou were asked what possible "suspicious" activity there was. Your response?
Vivify...now, stay with me here. "Zero reason to believe anything suspicious happened". You just wrote that. Snope it, Vivify. I said nothing close to that. You and MG and Suzianne need to go to the 'Debate with Truth' class and re-take the exam.
"I can't say".
In other words, zero reason to believe anything suspicious. Being called out for making baseless claims of cover-ups by Dems has apparently made you emotional.
@averagejoe1 saidSuzianne? MG? Handy? Do you see how elegantly and eloquently Mchill commented on the subject post?
Suzianne? MG? Handy? Do you see how elegantly and eloquently Mchill commented on the subject post? You could gain some insight from this, to contribute thoughtfully to the Forum, so that we may all come to an understanding months down the road.
Well - That was unexpected. Thank You
@vivify saidLOL...oh my
In other words, you don't like having to back up your false claims. Like when you started a thread implying Mueller's team wiped cell phones on purpose; when called out you were forced to admit you had zero reason to believe any thing suspicious happened.
No wonder you're ranting.
@vivify saidSorry, was at an evening fundraiser for children, if you can imagine mean ole me. Now, everyone, this is your assignment for tomorrow. Vivify, of the Forum Squad, has stated that I was asked what possible 'suspicious" activity there was, on the "27Cells Wiped Clean' post. We suffer these people for entertainment, but i looked up what in the hell he is talking about. I was actually asked, by Vivify, "Let'say all the phones were wiped deliberately. What specific reason would they have for doing so? What 'specific' information were they trying to hide?"
You were asked what possible "suspicious" activity there was. Your response?
"I can't say".
In other words, zero reason to believe anything suspicious. Being called out for making baseless claims of cover-ups by Dems has apparently made you emotional.
But, above, he now says, improperly, that I was asked what possible 'suspicious ' activity there was. Is that a lie, that thing that Suzianne always talks about,,,,a lie? Anyway , I was not asked that at all. There are 4 members of the squad, and several borderline. I will keep trucking with them because it is fun to ferret out their lies and misrepresentations. It would be More fun, tho, if they would not be like high schoolers. Difficult at best. We all try to be clever, introspetive, interesting , with a bit of humor thrown in. Their responses...are not. And we haven't even heard from Sonhouse.
FYI, Vivify, I did not even say 'I can't say'. Said 'Couldn't say.
Get some sleep Vivify. You can maybe give us a report on the assignment in the morning?