Originally posted by der schwarze RitterAhh yes the true hallmark of democracy : The right to say anything about anybody .... dit højreorienterede svin.
As more countries move to ban or restrict hate speech, the United States stands out for defending it, says the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/12/us/12hate.html
That's nothing. A Canadian couple has had their two children, ages 7 and 2, taken from them by Canadian child protection services because they were accused of being "racist" and providing an improper atmosphere at home for their beliefs. Canada is apparently going insane with political correctness.
Anyone have a link to the piece that was under attack?
From the small clipping included in the linked article, it sounds like the guy was just quoting something some priest said -- that sounded more like self-inflicted hate speech.
I dunno. When are people going to learn that having 10 kids in every family is unsustainable for this planet, whether you're muslim, jewish, christian, agnostic, atheist, or sphagnostic. It seems to be impossible to actually say so since that touches peoples cultural sensitivities.
Or... being accused of hate crime.
Originally posted by joneschrhttp://www.macleans.ca/culture/entertainment/article.jsp?content=20061023_134898_134898
Anyone have a link to the piece that was under attack?
From the small clipping included in the linked article, it sounds like the guy was just quoting something some priest said -- that sounded more like self-inflicted hate speech.
I dunno. When are people going to learn that having 10 kids in every family is unsustainable for this planet, whether yo ...[text shortened]... say so since that touches peoples cultural sensitivities.
Or... being accused of hate crime.
It's rambling nutjobery mostly asserting that liberal social democracies will be overrun by Islamic Fundamentalists because Muslims have higher birth rates. As such, it should be laughed at rather than suppressed.
Originally posted by no1marauderI think I'll take Bridget Bardot's opinion over yours on this matter.
http://www.macleans.ca/culture/entertainment/article.jsp?content=20061023_134898_134898
It's rambling nutjobery mostly asserting that liberal social democracies will be overrun by Islamic Fundamentalists because Muslims have higher birth rates. As such, it should be laughed at rather than suppressed.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterFooled by fading beauty once more!
I think I'll take Bridget Bardot's opinion over yours on this matter.
Wasn't it the women who helped perpetuate slavery in the South due to their paranoid fear that they would not be able to keep their men interested if they had to compete on an open free market with African women.
Originally posted by kmax87That's what the white men told their women to keep them quiet while they were doodling their slaves. But the true 'competitive' paranoia resided in the men.
Wasn't it the women who helped perpetuate slavery in the South due to their paranoid fear that they would not be able to keep their men interested if they had to compete on an open free market with African women.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageSo who started the whole size doesn't matter aphorism? Racist xenophobic white women who still wanted to get laid?
That's what the white men told their women to keep them quiet while they were doodling their slaves. But the true 'competitive' paranoia resided in the men.
Originally posted by joneschr"If we pass a sphagnum bog, we think how at this point he used to turn aside and put a few mosses into his box. Some professor in Germany, or a scholar in New Haven, had asked him to collect additional specimens. In those days of his sphagnum absorption we called him sometimes the 'sphagnostic.'"
Anyone have a link to the piece that was under attack?
From the small clipping included in the linked article, it sounds like the guy was just quoting something some priest said -- that sounded more like self-inflicted hate speech.
I dunno. When are people going to learn that having 10 kids in every family is unsustainable for this planet, whether yo ...[text shortened]... say so since that touches peoples cultural sensitivities.
Or... being accused of hate crime.
Bog Obsession: religion, or Axis I Personality Disorder? Operators are standing by...
1 edit
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterWhat's that saying again? Feather from a hen? No, that's not it. Do you
It shares the United State's northern border and calls itself Canada:
http://townhall.com/columnists/RobertKnight/2008/06/11/media_ignore_that_gagging_sound_from_canada
know the saying? I think it pretty much describes what you're doing here,
but I just can't remember it. Hmm.
I agree that restriction of freedom of speech (or write as it were) is a
sensitive matter. The sad fact is (and I'm sure you agree with me here
being such a... "lover of diversity" ), the sad fact is that people
might actually take a pothead such as Steyn seriously. Another fact is
that it's forbidden in most free countries to promote hate crimes.
I wonder where I stand on this one.