Go back
New World Order

New World Order

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

/www.illuminati-news.com/index.htm

Anybody got any views on this? Is their really a conspiracy to install a New World Government?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ianpickering
/www.illuminati-news.com/index.htm
Your cited link is down.

[Sorry, it works without the first slash. Didn't notice first time.]

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ianpickering
/www.illuminati-news.com/index.htm

Anybody got any views on this? Is their really a conspiracy to install a New World Government?
Looked the site over. I'm not big on conspiracy theories. People are too selfish, and I think the world is too complex to manipulate. Sounds like utter nonsense to me.

For example, simple errors seem a better explanation for Gore's loss in Florida than a global power group's manipulations.

I think conspiracy theories are popular mostly because political issues are so damned difficult to understand. Even very bright people who try really hard can have difficulty understanding many issues. Just look at our American congress members.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Nobody interested in this? Thought it might provoke some debate.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ianpickering
Nobody interested in this? Thought it might provoke some debate.
I guess that this is why it is so easy for the NWO to do what they do. How convenient for them that they enjoy the cover of a conspiracy theory. 🙂

-Ray.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ianpickering
/www.illuminati-news.com/index.htm

Anybody got any views on this? Is their really a conspiracy to install a New World Government?
You can't have slaves in a socialist state.

Why would a few men create a socialist system and therefor give away all the power they have?

On the hand, if you look at GATT, the world bank and IMF you can quite plainly see that a small group of men do have an extreme amount of money and power.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ianpickering
Nobody interested in this? Thought it might provoke some debate.
I don't know about anyone else, but I almost never respond to posts that just have links to websites. If you had given us a couple of paragraphs summarizing the site and/or giving us some of your views on it, then that might generate some interest. But to just provide a link and ask for thoughts on it is almost a guarantee of getting minimal input.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Can't expect it not to happen.

The democratic system in many countries are easy to control provided you have sufficient funds. When you need a substantial amount of resources to run an election campaign, what greater incentive that bribery ?

Add to that the already existing flawed media and you can't really expect the ultra rich not to play God with the rest of us.



Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pcaspian
Can't expect it not to happen.

The democratic system in many countries are easy to control provided you have sufficient funds. When you need a substantial amount of resources to run an election campaign, what greater incentive that bribery ?

Add to that the already existing flawed media and you can't really expect the ultra rich not to play God with the rest of us.



If that were true, we would only have multi-millionaire presidential candidates in the US, or at least raising money would be a priority to candidates.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
You can't have slaves in a socialist state.

Why would a few men create a socialist system and therefor give away all the power they have?

On the hand, if you look at GATT, the world bank and IMF you can quite plainly see that a small group of men do have an extreme amount of money and power.
I am sure the Gulag prisoners building roads in Siberia would have been glad to hear that.

But I forget - the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was not a socialist state, was it?