Go back
New York Odd Stats

New York Odd Stats

Debates

3 edits

https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data.page


I was looking at different days and noticed something odd.

April 1....1436 hospitalization with 365 deaths
April 9.... 835 hospitalizations with 340 deaths

This is a 60 percent increase in the rates of death. What would account for that?

Quite the number of deaths compared to hospitalizations. The later numbers seem to have the same pattern.


From link

As of March 31, the NYC Health Department is now reporting the number of COVID-19 cases by diagnosis date, instead of report date. 

So dates of hospitalization matches up with date, no lag.


April 12 is nice

5 hospitalizations, 195 deaths

That is nearly 40 deaths for each hospitalization.

1 edit

@eladar said
April 12 is nice

5 hospitalizations, 195 deaths

That is nearly 40 deaths for each hospitalization.
Deaths are a lagging indicator. Deaths are still high because the deaths these days are from infections that occurred a month ago.

Hospitalizations also lag, but maybe only by 2 weeks.

The decrease in hospitalizations these days (which has been dramatic) is a function of the reduction of infections in late March/early April that that social distancing measures taken in mid-late March caused. The dropoff in deaths may take another week or two as the small number of later March/early April infections will lead to fewer late April deaths.

There is no question that the number of infections has fallen, probably very dramatically.

2 edits

They said they are putting deaths and hospitalization both on date diagnosed. All three categories are supposed to be talking about the same people.

It appears that on the 12th many are being diagnosed after death.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@eladar said
They said they are putting deaths and hospitalization both on date diagnosed. All three categories are supposed to be talking about the same people.

It appears that on the 12th many are being diagnosed after death.
Then it's a totally useless stat. Date of diagnosis is all but arbitrary.


@sh76

I agree, it seems to me that they are trying to cook the books to make things look as bad as possible for as ling as possible.

If things are falling as those graphs show, no matter how you count it, in a week or two there should be dramatic drops.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@eladar said
@sh76

I agree, it seems to me that they are trying to cook the books to make things look as bad as possible for as ling as possible.

If things are falling as those graphs show, no matter how you count it, in a week or two there should be dramatic drops.
Keep in mind that data from recent days is incomplete.

But yes, the drops should come based on dramatic decreases in daily new hospitalizations as reported in Cuomo’s daily pressers.


@sh76

No matter how incomplete it is, that April 12 report is odd.


@eladar said
They said they are putting deaths and hospitalization both on date diagnosed. All three categories are supposed to be talking about the same people.

It appears that on the 12th many are being diagnosed after death.
What your link actually says is:
This chart shows the number of positive cases by diagnosis date, hospitalizations by admission date and deaths by date of death from COVID-19 on a daily basis since March 3.

As of March 31, the NYC Health Department is now reporting the number of COVID-19 cases by diagnosis date, instead of report date. Diagnosis date is the date that someone went to their doctor and had a swab taken for testing. We were previously using the reported date of infection. Diagnosis date is more reflective of when people are getting sick and being tested.

Due to this change, case counts per day reported previously will not match current daily counts. Information about cases over the last week will be incomplete until the laboratories and hospitals report the results for people who were tested, which can take a few days to a week.
So, they are dating cases to when the patient went to their doctor for a test rather than when their results are reported by the laboratory. Either is a reasonable statistic. They report hospitalizations as being when the patient is hospitalized, this will be the same as the date of diagnosis if they are tested on that day, there is nothing strange in this. The date of death will only be the same as the other two if they are tested, hospitalized and die on the same day.

There will be a delay in reporting the death as a covid-19 death if death occurs before the infection is reported.

By contrast Public Health England are reporting total numbers of cases and hospitalized deaths known by the time they release the data on a daily basis.


@DeepThought

Explain this

April 12

5 hospitalizations, 195 deaths 

That is nearly 40 deaths for each hospitalization.

1 edit

@eladar said
They said they are putting deaths and hospitalization both on date diagnosed. All three categories are supposed to be talking about the same people.

It appears that on the 12th many are being diagnosed after death.
No, they didn't. They said they were reporting the number of cases by diagnosis date.


@no1marauder

Explain this 

April 12 

5 hospitalizations, 195 deaths  

That is nearly 40 deaths for each hospitalization.


@eladar said
@no1marauder

Explain this 

April 12 

5 hospitalizations, 195 deaths  

That is nearly 40 deaths for each hospitalization.
Maybe people didn't want to be admitted to a hospital on Easter Sunday if they could possibly avoid it.

The ones dying didn't have a choice.

1 edit

@no1marauder said
Maybe people didn't want to be admitted to a hospital on Easter Sunday if they could possibly avoid it.

The ones dying didn't have a choice.
They died and were labeled coronavirus for no particular reason.


@eladar said
They died and were labeled coronavirus for no particular reason.
Where did you come up with that fantasy?