Here are some quotes from CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry under oath:
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated"
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-firms_sworn_testimony_it_had_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html
The reason I bring up this subject again is because certain democrats on this forum are in denial of CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry's admission under oath that "There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated".
The typical denial method used is to say "but he said there was circumstantial evidence" so that means there was evidence. Nope. There is no evidence.
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that." In other words, he doesn't have evidence. He has a guess, not evidence. He has an opinion, not evidence.
It is time for people to stop living in denial of facts. Crowdstrike had no evidence after lying and saying they did for years. Mueller had no evidence after misleading people into thinking he did. Did Mueller have evidence when he said it "appears" Russia hacked the DNC? "Appears" is not evidence. If it is magicians are witches that saw people in half and put them back together again. Appearance is not evidence.
Mueller's statement that Julian Assange lied when he said Russia was not the source and strongly implied it was Seth Rich was, is not a statement of fact. Mueller had no prove it was Russia and he has no prove it was not Seth Rich. He made statements of opinion (or lies), not facts.
@metal-brain saidYou do realise that ‘exfiltrated’ relates to what documents were uploaded during the Russian hack and there is no doubt about the hack itself.
Here are some quotes from CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry under oath:
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated"
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years ...[text shortened]... Russia and he has no prove it was not Seth Rich. He made statements of opinion (or lies), not facts.
Now all that is left for people to decide is whether or not they think the Russians would go to all the trouble of hacking them servers but then not take anything away with them 🙄
@metal-brain saidStop lying about what Crowdstrike said based on a debunked article by a conspiracy theorist:
Here are some quotes from CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry under oath:
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated"
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years ...[text shortened]... Russia and he has no prove it was not Seth Rich. He made statements of opinion (or lies), not facts.
""Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?
Yes,"
"Does CrowdStrike have evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC network?
Yes. Shawn Henry stated in his testimony to the House Intelligence Committee that CrowdStrike had indicators of exfiltration (page 32) and that data had clearly left the network. Also, on page 2, the Intelligence Community Assessment also confirmed that the Russian intelligence agency GRU “had exfiltrated large volumes of data from the DNC.”"
https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/
Reading the whole thing, which I've given you a link to dozens of times, might be instructive.
@metal-brain saidAnd stop lying about the Mueller Report, which you have quite obviously never bothered to even look at:
Here are some quotes from CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry under oath:
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated"
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years ...[text shortened]... Russia and he has no prove it was not Seth Rich. He made statements of opinion (or lies), not facts.
"The GRU began stealing DCCC data shortly after it gained access to the network. On April 14, 2016 (approximately three days after the initial intrusion) GRU officers downloaded rar.exe onto the DCCC’s document server. The following day, the GRU searched one compromised DCCC computer for files containing search terms that included “Hillary,” “DNC,” “Cruz,” and “Trump.”131 On April 25, 2016, the GRU collected and compressed PDF and Microsoft documents
from folders on the DCCC’s shared file server that pertained to the 2016 election.132 The GRU appears to have compressed and exfiltrated over 70 gigabytes of data from this file server.133
The GRU also stole documents from the DNC network shortly after gaining access. On April 22, 2016, the GRU copied files from the DNC network to GRU-controlled computers. Stolen documents included the DNC’s opposition research into candidate Trump.134 Between approximately May 25, 2016 and June 1, 2016, GRU officers accessed the DNC’s mail server from a GRU-controlled computer leased inside the United States.135"
p. 40
https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download
These are exact dates and exact information that was stolen including a file name.
As to "exfiltration":
"On July 14, 2016, GRU officers used a Guccifer 2.0 email account to send WikiLeaks an email bearing the subject “big archive” and the message “a new attempt.”163 The email contained an encrypted attachment with the name “wk dnc link1.txt.gpg.”164 Using the Guccifer 2.0 Twitter account, GRU officers sent WikiLeaks an encrypted file and instructions on how to open it.165 On
July 18, 2016, WikiLeaks confirmed in a direct message to the Guccifer 2.0 account that it had “the 1Gb or so archive” and would make a release of the stolen documents “this week.”166 On July 22, 2016, WikiLeaks released over 20,000 emails and other documents stolen from the DNC computer networks.167 The Democratic National Convention began three days later.
p. 46
https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download
Again exact dates, excerpts from e-mails and file names.
@no1marauder said"Does CrowdStrike have evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC network?
Stop lying about what Crowdstrike said based on a debunked article by a conspiracy theorist:
""Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?
Yes,"
"Does CrowdStrike have evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC network?
Yes. Shawn Henry stated in his testimony to the House Intelligence Committee that CrowdStrike had indicators of exfiltration ( ...[text shortened]... e/
Reading the whole thing, which I've given you a link to dozens of times, might be instructive.
Yes. Shawn Henry stated in his testimony to the House Intelligence Committee that CrowdStrike had indicators of exfiltration"
Indicators is not proof. End of.
@no1marauder saidThere is no proof GRU is Russia.
And stop lying about the Mueller Report, which you have quite obviously never bothered to even look at:
"The GRU began stealing DCCC data shortly after it gained access to the network. On April 14, 2016 (approximately three days after the initial intrusion) GRU officers downloaded rar.exe onto the DCCC’s document server. The following day, the GRU searched one c ...[text shortened]... 73816/download
These are exact dates and exact information that was stolen including a file name.
CIA's UMBRAGE has been explained to you countless times.
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that
There is no proof. He said he can't say based on that. That means no proof.
@metal-brain saidWhat exactly do you mean "proof"?
There is no proof GRU is Russia.
CIA's UMBRAGE has been explained to you countless times.
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that
There is no proof. He said he can't say based on that. That means no proof.
Earlier, you claimed there was "no evidence". Which is it?
Of course, the data was "exfiltrated"; it wound up on newspapers all over the world.
@no1marauder saidAsked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."
What exactly do you mean "proof"?
Earlier, you claimed there was "no evidence". Which is it?
Of course, the data was "exfiltrated"; it wound up on newspapers all over the world.
That is what I mean by no proof. Henry testified he could not say. That means they don't know. You know fully well there is no evidence it was "exfiltrated". Stop lying.
@metal-brain saidOh dude, you're just asking to be shot down like a US president in an open-topped vehicle.
Here are some quotes from CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry under oath:
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated"
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years ...[text shortened]... Russia and he has no prove it was not Seth Rich. He made statements of opinion (or lies), not facts.
@no1marauder saidBANG!
Stop lying about what Crowdstrike said based on a debunked article by a conspiracy theorist:
""Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?
Yes,"
"Does CrowdStrike have evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC network?
Yes. Shawn Henry stated in his testimony to the House Intelligence Committee that CrowdStrike had indicators of exfiltration ( ...[text shortened]... e/
Reading the whole thing, which I've given you a link to dozens of times, might be instructive.
And Metalbrain has once again seen his peanut blown out his skull and splashed all over the rear window in what can only be described as a minor blow to his intellect.
@shavixmir saidThis is the debate forum, not the troll to avoid debates you know you cannot win forum. Take it to the ad hominem attack forum.
BANG!
And Metalbrain has once again seen his peanut blown out his skull and splashed all over the rear window in what can only be described as a minor blow to his intellect.
@Metal-Brain
You little POS CREEP. NOTHING you puke out here is going to change the FACT JACK Russians DID hack the DNC.