Originally posted by zeeblebotNot sure what the point of your cut and paste job was, but on these questions you're right.
so, the second question is, if iran is pursuing a low-enrichment capability, what's all the fuss about? and why don't they prove it?
on the other hand, if they're pursuing something higher-grade, what's all the fuss about? they're on the same road as Iraq was. pursuing a WMD program or not pursuing a WMD program, and either way hiding their actions and purposes.
But why should Iran have to prove anything?
Originally posted by amannionAustralia will need them to stem the aggressive imperialistic ambitions of Indonesia.
I can't.
(Do any of the scandinavian countries have enrichment programs for their reactors or do they get the fuel from someone else?)
But couldn't it happen?
I can't imagine Australia for example, developing nuclear weapons. Given our close strategic alliance with the US, we hardly need them do we?
Australia is safe only when we can insure that any opposing force is defeated at sea.
Nuclear weapons would guarantee that nobody would invade.