Go back
Nuclear Jihad?

Nuclear Jihad?

Debates


Originally posted by stellspalfie
you believe it is the end days. sooooooooo, whats the issue, you think we are all going to die, knee deep in blood in one big old battle at meggido, so what difference does it make if a nuke goes of in the mean time??? if one does go of then surely it is all part of gods great tapestry anyway??

do you have any objections to this train of logic?? it seems consistent with posts you and rj have previously made regarding 'the end of times'
as long as the nuke explodes in the USA I don't care.


Originally posted by redbadger
as long as the nuke explodes in the USA I don't care.
Don't you know the Jihadists are setting the first one for Glasgow?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
Don't you know the Jihadists are setting the first one for Glasgow?
I am in the south of france at the moment but poor Robbie ha ha

1 edit

What is Irag doing with "nuclear materials" when the purpose of the US going into Iraq in the first place was to find and remove weapons of mass destruction and materials that could be used the make weapons of mass destruction? Obama has failed us again. How long are we going to put up with his incompetence. I agree with Sarah Palin that he should be impeached immediately before he causes more damage.



ov Sarah Palin On Why She Believes Its Time To Impeach Pres Obama - Hannity


1 edit

-Removed-
I get these feelings that I need to make these stupid threads in an attempt to wake up those with their heads up their ass.

I just play chess here at my daughters request to do something I enjoy to give my brain some exercise. The so-called experts on here have lower ratings than myself, so that should tell you something about the so-called experts. And your ad hominem attacks don't prove any point, but that you are a suck ass.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
I get these feelings that I need to make these stupid threads in an attempt to wake up those with their heads up their ass.

I just play chess here at my daughters request to do something I enjoy to give my brain some exercise. The so-called experts on here have lower ratings than myself, so that should tell you something about the so-called experts. And your ad hominem attacks don't prove any point, but that you are a suck ass.
Their point is no B rated player could get to 2200 points here without help from an engine. Why don't you post a video of yourself making moves without your engine involved. I guess you could still cheat but hey, people are accusing you of cheating.

Vote Up
Vote Down


-Removed-
Germany v Agrentina .. now on.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
I wouldn't take any notice he is a nob head

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
What is Irag doing with "nuclear materials" when the purpose of the US going into Iraq in the first place was to find and remove weapons of mass destruction and materials that could be used the make weapons of mass destruction? Obama has failed us again. How long are we going to put up with his incompetence. I agree with Sarah Palin that he should be imp ...[text shortened]... Believes Its Time To Impeach Pres Obama - Hannity

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvZOTd-xj7g
Ron, will you PLEASE STOP POSTING YOUR POLITICAL RUBBISH IN SPIRITUALITY????

Seriously, Ron, I don't want to see you get kicked out of another forum.


Originally posted by sonhouse
Their point is no B rated player could get to 2200 points here without help from an engine. Why don't you post a video of yourself making moves without your engine involved. I guess you could still cheat but hey, people are accusing you of cheating.
I agree that I could not get a 2200 rating if I were playing under OTB conditions. However, here I am allowed to use opening books, GM games, analyze boards, take a nap, etc. and I have a lot more time to look for tactics. And sometimes I get lucky and see the best move. My rating on here is about 2100 now, that is higher than any of my accusers.


Could The Border Crisis Provide Cover To ISIS Operatives?

Vote Up
Vote Down

They would use regular explosives and explode the material .......a dirty bomb that would make people sick from radiation not an atomic device too complicated and not enough refined material


Manny

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
What is Irag doing with "nuclear materials" when the purpose of the US going into Iraq in the first place was to find and remove weapons of mass destruction and materials that could be used the make weapons of mass destruction? Obama has failed us again. How long are we going to put up with his incompetence. I agree with Sarah Palin that he should be imp ...[text shortened]... Believes Its Time To Impeach Pres Obama - Hannity

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvZOTd-xj7g
When they went into Iraq they were looking for chemical weapons, since that was what Saddam's regime had a history of using. It's normal for universities to have radioactive materials for research purposes. They took 40kg of unenriched uranium, which they can't do much with. The best they could hope for is a dirty bomb and the clean up isn't that difficult.