New York Times Reporter Says Steele Pee Tape ‘Doesn’t Exist’
New York Times reporter Matthew Rosenberg said the infamous “pee tape” from Christopher Steele’s anti-Trump dossier “doesn’t exist,” according to the latest video released by Project Veritas.
Rosenberg mentioned something that “involved CIA and NSA” before saying he believes the pee tape does not exist. “It involved the CIA and NSA. It involved Trump and involved that ridiculous, like, pee tape, which of course doesn’t exist,” Rosenberg allegedly says on the video.
------------------------
Of course, Trump (nor anyone) can prove a negative (the tape does not exist) however, you can prove a positive, that the tape *does* exist simply by producing it. Hilary Clinton has touted the famed Steele dossier, let here demonstrate the tape exists.
Ya, right. LOL
https://miamistandard.news/2022/03/11/new-york-times-reporter-says-steele-pee-tape-doesnt-exist/
@earl-of-trumps saidDo you consider this
New York Times Reporter Says Steele Pee Tape ‘Doesn’t Exist’
[i]New York Times reporter Matthew Rosenberg said the infamous “pee tape” from Christopher Steele’s anti-Trump dossier “doesn’t exist,” according to the latest video released by Project Veritas.
Rosenberg mentioned something that “involved CIA and NSA” before saying he believes the pee tape does ...[text shortened]...
https://miamistandard.news/2022/03/11/new-york-times-reporter-says-steele-pee-tape-doesnt-exist/
a noteworthy issue?
@contenchess saidI don't say fake, I don't say true,
I'm sure his point is yall believe any story that some liberal makes up as long as it attacks some white guy.
If the piss story was about Obama yall would say fake news.
to me it's a non issue unless, of course,
you're interested in urine.
@contenchess saidI don't get news from 'rumble,' so it's quite probable
You mean the democrats who kept talking about a piss tape that never existed?
You'll have to ask them if they are into urine.
They your friends after all 😉
that I don't know anything of a urine tape,
anyway, CANADIANS aren't able to assume....
At least not in your case 😆
@earl-of-trumps saidWho cares? The Steele Dossier was reports consisting of raw intelligence data and the story it told i.e. that the Russians in 2016 favored Donald Trump and took steps to attempt to help him win the election has been verified beyond any serious doubt.
New York Times Reporter Says Steele Pee Tape ‘Doesn’t Exist’
[i]New York Times reporter Matthew Rosenberg said the infamous “pee tape” from Christopher Steele’s anti-Trump dossier “doesn’t exist,” according to the latest video released by Project Veritas.
Rosenberg mentioned something that “involved CIA and NSA” before saying he believes the pee tape does ...[text shortened]...
https://miamistandard.news/2022/03/11/new-york-times-reporter-says-steele-pee-tape-doesnt-exist/
Whether the particular tape mentioned exists or not is immaterial to that reality (besides the fact that what a reporter believes or doesn't believe is hardly conclusive).
@no1marauder saidRight on.....as I said, non-issue.
Who cares? The Steele Dossier was reports consisting of raw intelligence data and the story it told i.e. that the Russians in 2016 favored Donald Trump and took steps to attempt to help him win the election has been verified beyond any serious doubt.
Whether the particular tape mentioned exists or not is immaterial to that reality (besides the fact that what a reporter believes or doesn't believe is hardly conclusive).
@no1marauder saidLOL…
Who cares? The Steele Dossier was reports consisting of raw intelligence data and the story it told i.e. that the Russians in 2016 favored Donald Trump and took steps to attempt to help him win the election has been verified beyond any serious doubt.
Whether the particular tape mentioned exists or not is immaterial to that reality (besides the fact that what a reporter believes or doesn't believe is hardly conclusive).
@contenchess saidUh huh. Rep v. Dem. is more the deciding factor here.
I'm sure his point is yall believe any story that some liberal makes up as long as it attacks some white guy.
If the piss story was about Obama yall would say fake news.
🤔
@jimm619 saidWell, it wasn't a non-issue for CNN and a hundred million Americans, now, was it?
I don't say fake, I don't say true,
to me it's a non issue unless, of course,
you're interested in urine.
Also, what should be of interest to you is that Hilary used this FAKE information to get the FBI
to obtain a warrant to spy on citizen Donald Trump while he ran for office and while he was President.
Non-issue, Jimm? Uh huh.
@no1marauder saidSaying the Russians favored Trump is one thing, saying that Trump is a perverted sociopath is another.
Who cares? The Steele Dossier was reports consisting of raw intelligence data and the story it told i.e. that the Russians in 2016 favored Donald Trump and took steps to attempt to help him win the election has been verified beyond any serious doubt.
Whether the particular tape mentioned exists or not is immaterial to that reality (besides the fact that what a reporter believes or doesn't believe is hardly conclusive).
The Russians had their hand in many a state elections this past year and that is just what they do.
You cannot say that Trump was part and parcel to what the Russians do. After all,
the Russians tried to hack the RNC email system as well, in 2016. So you can't blame Trump
for something the Russians did.
One last: You say that the info was "verified beyond any serious doubt", by who, the FBI??? What a joke.