Go back
Observation on Jan 6 hearing, respectful submitted

Observation on Jan 6 hearing, respectful submitted

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@techsouth said
Was there any evidence that Trump stole the 2016 election?
No. Whataboutism. Hillary's claim that trump's win was illegitimate is based on the fact that he broke rules and norms of politics. Like Tom Brady in deflategate. Also she concede the race and there was peaceful transition of power.


Trump said and continues.to say the election itself was fraudulent. This is false. Fake news. For obvious reasons this idea needs to be kicked down a hole and people who promote this fake idea should be deported to Venezuela.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
Any one here with legal minds...... Lets us observe the Jan 6 hearings.
Cross examination is not allowed, there is no one to 'object'...... The leader of the hearing actually introduced a video by saying.."So, without objection...." WHO would have a standing to object in this environment???
The dems have a good story to tell, given, but they have set it u ...[text shortened]... .

No question this is all about getting Trump. Shouldn't we look more at security, other issues.?
Hang in there, averagjoe.
The trial is coming.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mghrn55
Trials already happening and some of the not so Proud boys now pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy. Can't wait for it to get to the head of the snake.

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

"There was never an indication of interest in what the actual facts were... After the election he didn't seem to be listening."

- Bill Barr

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

"in no instance did a court find that charges of fraud were real... the simple fact is that the Trump campaign did not make its case."

- Ben Ginsberg (Republican lawyer)

1 edit
Vote Up
2
Vote Down

I think you can see what this is building toward Joe. If you know that what you are saying is false, and you have been told lots and lots of times that this is false, and you raise money and advertise events and take donations based on declarations that an obvious falsehood is true, then you are committing mail fraud which is a federal crime.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

@sonhouse said
@mghrn55
Trials already happening and some of the not so Proud boys now pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy. Can't wait for it to get to the head of the snake.
They broke some men by locking them in solitary for months and months, literally torture, they then dangled a plea deal. Of course sonhouse would have been confessing to shooting kennedy on day two.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@wajoma said
They broke some men by locking them in solitary for months and months, literally torture, they then dangled a plea deal. Of course sonhouse would have been confessing to shooting kennedy on day two.
So says, ''The Creepy Kiwi.''

Vote Up
Vote Down

@wildgrass said
"in no instance did a court find that charges of fraud were real... the simple fact is that the Trump campaign did not make its case."

- Ben Ginsberg (Republican lawyer)
Understandable, usually you need evidence. 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
Ok, you do not LIKE Trump but it's like, he's an assshole but he is MY assshole.
So what about the issue I actually brought up? You are evading that one.

That goes to the crux of the issue that Trump STARTED the coup along with hundreds of others and he WAS in communications directly with the Proud boys.

So what is it about that issue you don't want to d ...[text shortened]... ors which is what Pence would not allow.
Do you at least agree with THAT, there WERE fake electors?
Settle, man, wander a bit in the meadow. Do you not get this simple issue? I cannot repeat it, it does not need repeating. Read it again in first post. Or start a thread on Trump, that may be the best thing. I am writing an issue of the decorum of this 2-week discussion among democrats. Its OK.

Vote Up
Vote Down

https://www.npr.org/2022/06/12/1104418170/31-members-of-a-white-nationalist-group-were-arrested-for-planning-to-riot-at-pr

Vote Up
Vote Down

If the dems succeed, that Trump cannot run again ,..... The repubs, including me ( everyone wants to get personal on the Forum??) want him to go away. They think that he is not the guy, I believe.
So, new threads everyone !!!! Who will lead our ticket!!??!
And, will Sonhouse continue into the year 2030 writing about Trump?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
If the dems succeed, that Trump cannot run again ,..... The repubs, including me ( everyone wants to get personal on the Forum??) want him to go away. They think that he is not the guy, I believe.
So, new threads everyone !!!! Who will lead our ticket!!??!
And, will Sonhouse continue into the year 2030 writing about Trump?
I'd want to forget him too/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Y'all ought to nominate LIZ CHENEY.....
Her and Kinzinger, (?)
Only honest REPUBLICANS I can see

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
If the dems succeed, that Trump cannot run again ,..... The repubs, including me ( everyone wants to get personal on the Forum??) want him to go away. They think that he is not the guy, I believe.
So, new threads everyone !!!! Who will lead our ticket!!??!
And, will Sonhouse continue into the year 2030 writing about Trump?
They'll never run but I think Ben Sasse or Liz Cheney would be great presidents.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wildgrass said
They'll never run but I think Ben Sasse or Liz Cheney would be great presidents.
Sasse is too sane for the current GOP.
Psaki, is O.K too.