1 edit
Originally posted by Sam The ShamIndeed...his chin wobbled when he spoke to the court, then got his sentence went outside the court room and was grinning to his entourage....the mans a maggot and should be tortured with plyers and a blow torch daily.
Good, then he can still have time to get out and continue his search for the real killers of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman.
Originally posted by Hells CaretakerI'd rather see him hung by his sac while being eaten by Caligula's dogs.
Indeed...his chin wobbled when he spoke to the court, then got his sentence went outside the court room and was grinning to his entourage....the mans a maggot and should be tortured with plyers and a blow torch daily.
GRANNY.
He was found innocent and should be thought of as such. I don't see how he can have a had an unbiased trail considering the hype which went along with the first case.
I believe his lawyers are thinking along the same lines. I think his sentence will be reduced after an appeal.
1 edit
Originally posted by FeastboyThen that will be a second miscarriage of justice, wouldn't it. I am baffled by the logic. "He got away with murder, so he can't get a fair trial and should get away with this". Where does it end?
He was found innocent and should be thought of as such. I don't see how he can have a had an unbiased trail considering the hype which went along with the first case.
I believe his lawyers are thinking along the same lines. I think his sentence will be reduced after an appeal.
Originally posted by badmoon"Murderers get less."
If he weren't a vilified celebrity he wouldn't have gotten near that length of sentence. I'm surprised at those (most of you) who feel that yet another injustice somehow qualifies or equalizes a prior one.
The sentence was totally unfair. Murderers get less.
Yes He Did!
GRANNY.
2 edits
Originally posted by badmoonWrong. Even Simpson's lawyers said the sentence was appropriate and more lenient than they expected.
If he weren't a vilified celebrity he wouldn't have gotten near that length of sentence. I'm surprised at those (most of you) who feel that yet another injustice somehow qualifies or equalizes a prior one.
The sentence was totally unfair. Murderers get less.
Totally unfair, eh? Do you even know what he was found guilty of?
Originally posted by FeastboyHe was found guilty in the civil court and he has never paid for the damages.
He was found innocent and should be thought of as such. I don't see how he can have a had an unbiased trail considering the hype which went along with the first case.
I believe his lawyers are thinking along the same lines. I think his sentence will be reduced after an appeal.
Harri / Luck